Case law

LaGrone v. City of Oakland

202 Cal. App. 4th 932 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 2011

(Board). … (Connerly v.

Ogden Entertainment v. WCAB

California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2015

ADJ4599548, Petitioner, ADJ1414058) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and KRISTIAN VON RITZHOFF, Respondents. … (People v.

County of Siskiyou v. Superior Court

217 Cal. App. 4th 83 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 2013

In Copeland v. Fairview Land etc. … (Stanislaus Water Co. v. Bachman (1908) 152 Cal. 716, 724; San Juan G. Co. v. San Juan R. etc. Assn. (1939) 34 Cal.App.2d 159, 174; Relovich v. Stuart (1931) 211 Cal. 422, 428.)

People v. Allen

53 Cal. App. 4th 1127 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1997

Brown (Brown) found defendant “passed out” or asleep on the front lawn of a Martinez residence. Brown awakened defendant and determined he was intoxicated. He arranged for defendant’s transportation to “detox.” … Brown looked inside and discovered six small plastic bags containing a white-colored powder. Brown then arrested defendant. At the jury trial, Susan N.

Peterson v. Rose

220 Cal. App. 2d 386 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1963

Under the facts presented, in the absence of the consent of the parties (see Goossen v. … Construing the notice of appeal liberally (Luz v. Lopes, 55 Cal.2d 54, 59-60 [ 10 Cal.Rptr. 161 , 358 P.2d 289 ]), we treat it as constituting an appeal from the judgment. (See Code Civ. Proc., $$ 1294, subd.

Gonsalves v. Associacao Protectora Uniao Madeirense Do Estado Da California

70 Cal. App. 2d 150 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 12, 1945

The respondents elected to try appellant before the Supreme Board of Directors. … Alternatively we should say that, since the writ of mandate is a writ of discretion and not a writ of right (Ertman v.

Yancey v. State Personnel Bd.

167 Cal. App. 3d 478 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1985

Rptr. 634 ROBERT YANCEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, Defendant and Respondent; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Docket No. A026713. … Rptr. 351 ], citing Morrison v. State Board of Education (1969) 1 Cal.3d 214, 225 [ 82 Cal.

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Metrim Corp.

187 Cal. App. 2d 289 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 1960

V(C) tit. 12 (Banks *291 and Banking), of the Code of Federal Regulations] (hereinafter referred to as “Rules”). On April 19, 1960, Board, by order number 13372, appointed C. E. … (Echlin v. Superior Court, 13 Cal.2d 368, 372 [2] [ 90 P.2d 63 , 124 A.L.R. 719 ] ; Wright v. Security-First Nat. Bank, 13 Cal.2d 139, 140 [2] [ 88 P.2d 125 ] ; Hendricks v.

RGC Gaslamp v. Ehmcke Sheet Metal Co.

California Court of Appeal · Oct 23, 2020

Brown Electrical Contractor, Inc. v. Rhino Electric Supply, Inc. (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 1118 (A.F. … Brown, supra, 137 Cal.App.4th at p. 1124; § 47, subd. (b).)

Gordon v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.

170 Cal. App. 4th 1103 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2009

(See Kelly v. New West Federal Savings (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 659, 677 [ 56 Cal.Rptr.2d 803 ] (Kelly); Brown v. … The present case is analogous to Kelly and Brown and distinguishable from Zhou and Tudor.

Lumpkin v. Jordan

49 Cal. App. 4th 1223 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1996

(See Espada v. Woodroffe (D.P.R. 1995) 896 F.Supp. 69, 71 ; Brown v. Polk County, Iowa (S.D. … (Boccardo v.

Wendz v. Dept. of Education

California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 2023

(See Medical Board v. Superior Court, supra, 111 Cal.App.4th at p. 179; J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. … (See Woodbury v. Brown- Dempsey (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 421, 433 [“Ordinarily, the word ‘may’ connotes a discretionary or permissive act”].)

Wences v. City of Los Angeles

177 Cal. App. 4th 305 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 2009

Chief Bratton agreed with the findings of the Use of Force Review Board and recommended to the Board of Police Commissioners that it do the same. … (Dickey v. Retirement Board (1976) 16 Cal.3d 745, 751 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 289 , 548 P.2d 689 ] (Dickey).)

Mazzola v. City and County of San Francisco

112 Cal. App. 3d 141 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1980

(Morrison v. State Board of Education (1969) 1 Cal.3d 214, 231 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 461 P.2d 375 ].) … (For example; Sequoia Vacuum Systems v.

People v. John R.

92 Cal. App. 3d 566 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1979

Appellant’s testimony was consistent with that of Ralph Brown, the liquor store manager, who was inside the store and who testified for respondent. … (People v. Blakeman, 170 Cal.App.2d 596, 599 [ 339 P.2d 202 ].) *569 Relying upon People v.

People v. Cluchey

142 Cal. App. 2d 563 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 1956

People v. Brown, 29 Cal.2d 555 [ 176 P.2d 929 ].) … (People v. Brown, 29 Cal.2d 555, 559 [ 176 P.2d. 929 ].) An argument that there was no intention is based on the testimony of Spencer given on the hearing of the motion for a new trial.

Everfield v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

115 Cal. App. 3d 15 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1981

(Renteria v. County of Orange (1978) 82 Cal. App.3d 833 [ 147 Cal.Rptr. 447 ]; Unruh v. Truck Insurance Exchange, supra, 1 Cal.3d 616.) … (Noe v. Travelers Ins. Co., supra, 172 Cal.App.2d 731, 737 .)

House of Rest of Presbyterian Church v. County of Los Angeles

151 Cal. App. 2d 523 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1957

It aids and augments the Board of Foreign Missions’ program of spreading Christianity throughout the world. It is used solely in carrying out that program. (Y.M.C.A. v. … (Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v.

People v. Johnson

14 Cal. App. 2d 373 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1936

In People v. … In People v.

First Interstate Bank v. State of California

197 Cal. App. 3d 627 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1987

Code, §§ 72201, 72287, 72300, 72419; Ward v. San Diego School Dist. (1928) 203 Cal. 712, 715 [ 265 P. 821 ]; Butler v. Compton Junior College Dist. (1947) 77 Cal.App.2d 719, 728 [ 176 P.2d 417 ]; Kelso v. … (Hall v. City of Taft (1956) 47 Cal.2d 177, 181 [ 302 P.2d 574 ]; Gonzalez v. State of California (1972) 29 Cal.App.3d 585, 590 [ 105 Cal.Rptr. 804 ].)