Case law

Shuffer v. Bd. of Trs. of Cal. State Univ. & Colls.

67 Cal. App. 3d 208 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1977

Proc., §§ 430.10, 430.30) has been discussed in Colvig v. … (See also, Goldberg v. Regents of the University of California (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 867, 873-875 [ 57 Cal.Rptr. 463 ]; Poschman v. Dumke (1973) 31 Cal.App.3d 932 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 596 ].)

People v. Superior Court

276 Cal. App. 2d 581 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 1969

First: It is contended that Sergeant Brown should have been produced as a witness. The contention is without merit. … For other discussions consult: People v. Perillo (1969) 275 Cal. App.2d 778 [ 80 Cal.Rptr. 160 ]; Lockridge v. Superior Court (1969) 275 Cal.App.2d 612 [ 80 Cal.Rptr. 223 ]; People v.

Rassaii v. The Board of Trustees of the Cal. State University CA6

California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 2023

Filed 2/23/23 Rassaii v. The Board of Trustees of the Cal. … H049561 - Rassaii v. The Board of Trustees of the California State University

People v. John R.

92 Cal. App. 3d 566 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1979

Appellant’s testimony was consistent with that of Ralph Brown, the liquor store manager, who was inside the store and who testified for respondent. … (People v. Blakeman, 170 Cal.App.2d 596, 599 [ 339 P.2d 202 ].) *569 Relying upon People v.

People v. Turner

267 Cal. App. 2d 440 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1968

(See People v. Photo (1941) 45 C.A.2d 345, 353, 114 P.2d 71 ; People v. Brown (1894) 105 C. 66 , 69, 38 P. 518 ; People v. Pillsbury (1943) 59 C.A.2d 107, 111, 138 P.2d 320 ; *444 People v. … (See Roberts v. State, supra, 136 Tex.Cr.Rep. 138 [ 124 S.W.2d 128 ] ; Hooks v. State, 154 Tenn. 43 [ 289 S.W. 529 ]; State v. Brown (Mo.) 217 S.W.2d 546 ; Dixon v.

Scott v. Common Council

44 Cal. App. 4th 684 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1996

(Hicks v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 69 Cal.App.3d 228, 235 .) … (Hicks v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 69 Cal.App.3d 228, 241.)

Teresi v. State of California

180 Cal. App. 3d 239 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1986

Citing Royal Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Control (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 788 [ 160 Cal.Rptr. 458 ], defendants argue that mandate does not lie to review decisions of the board. … (Molien v.

Beck v. Ransome-Crummey Co.

42 Cal. App. 674 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1919

App. 208 , [ 182 Pac. 473 ].) [1] "When an assessment is attacked on the ground that the local board failed to acquire original jurisdiction, the owner may rest on the constitutional guaranty that his property may not be … (Schwiesau v. Mahon, 110 Cal. 543 , [ 42 Pac. 1065 ] ; Heft v.

Holden v. California Employment Stabilization Commission

101 Cal. App. 2d 427 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1950

The leading case is Farrell v. … (Johnston v. Baker, 167 Cal. 260 [ 139 P. 86 ]; Romero v. Snyder, 167 Cal. 216 [ 138 P. 1002 ]; Jackson v. Thompson, 47 Cal.App.2d 405 [ 118 P.2d 31 ]; Cohn v. Rosenberg, 62 Cal.App.2d 140 [ 144 P.2d 399 ].)

Copeland v. Rabing

104 Cal. App. 2d 98 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1951

(Estate of Ayers, 175 Cal. 187 [ 165 P. 528 ]; Schubert v. Reich, 36 Cal.2d 298 [ 223 P.2d 242 ].) … (See Browning v. Browning, 208 Cal. 518 [ 282 P. 503 ]; Wold v. League of the Cross, 107 Cal.App. 344 [ 290 P. 460 ].) In Weil v.

Warder v. Hutchison

69 Cal. App. 291 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1924

In Thompson v. … In Zellner v.

Otto v. Reardon

21 Cal. App. 2d 260 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1937

Rule two, section 3, which was adopted by the board provides in part in that regard: “Whenever the duties of a position . . . are changed so that they differ substantially . . . the board shall reclassify such position and … Unless there is a clear abuse of discretion in that regard we may not interfere with the province of the board by means of mandamus or otherwise. (Mann v. Tracy, 185 Cal. 272 [ 196 Pac. 484 ].)

Schaeffer v. Public Employees' Retirement System

202 Cal. App. 3d 609 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1988

(Ames v. Board of Retirement (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 906, 916 [ 195 Cal.Rptr. 453 ]; Boxx v. Board of Administration (1980) 114 Cal.App.3d 79, 83 [ 170 Cal.Rptr. 538 ]; Neeley v. … The Crumpler definition was adopted and followed in Boxx v. Board of Administration, supra, 114 Cal.App.3d at page 86 . On the other hand, in Neeley v.

People v. Akins

56 Cal. App. 4th 331 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 1997

(People v. … (People v.

Marshall v. Medical Board of California CA2/7

California Court of Appeal · Aug 23, 2022

Filed 8/23/22 Marshall v. … (Accord, Landau v.

In Re Kler

188 Cal. App. 4th 1399 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 5, 2010

In September 2009, the Board of Parole Hearings (Board) held a new hearing and found petitioner suitable for parole, a decision the Governor, in February 2010, reversed, relying exclusively on the facts of the commitment … (People v. Romero (1994) 8 Cal.4th 728, 737 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 270 , 883 P.2d 388 ].) Having original jurisdiction and exercising it are two separate things.

Van Houten v. Whitaker

169 Cal. App. 2d 510 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1959

(Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 34 Cal.2d 564 ). … (Brown v. Superior *517 Court, supra, 34 Cal.2d 564 ). The case of Halldin v. Usher, 49 Cal.2d 749 [ 321 P.2d 746 ], where the present point was raised, does not appear to be to the contrary.

CONSOLIDATED MANAGEMENT GROUP v. Department of Corporations

75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 795 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 2008

Intern, v. American Fam. Mortg. (D.Minn. 2006) 417 F.Supp.2d 1073 , 1087; Lillard v. Stockton (N.D.Okla. 2003) 267 F.Supp.2d 1081, 1115-1116 ; Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. … Earthboard Sports USA, Inc. (6th Cir. 2007) 481 F.3d 901, 910-912 (Brown)’, Grubka v. WebAccess Intern., Inc. (D.Colo. 2006) 445 F.Supp.2d 1259, 1269-1270 (Grubka)’, Hamby v.

Krinsky v. Doe 6

72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 231 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 6, 2008

message board devoted to SFBC. … message board devoted to SGI.

Stanley v. The Board of Trustees of the Cal. State University CA5

California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 2023

Filed 1/3/23 Stanley v. The Board of Trustees of the Cal. … City of Loma Linda (2000) 24 Cal.4th 61, 72; McDaniel v. Board of Education (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 1618, 1621- 1622 (McDaniel); Garcia v.