Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.09s

  • Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Claude Fisher Co.

    161 Cal. App. 2d 431 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1958

    The language of the reviewing court in Stafford v. … (State v. Superior Court, 14 Cal.App. 2d 718 [ 58 P.2d 1322 ].)

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • In Re Jackson

    182 Cal. App. 3d 439 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1986

    (Italics added, People v. Fusaro (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 877, 888 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 368 ], disapproved on other grounds in People v. … (People v. Fusaro, supra, 18 Cal.App.3d at p. 888 .)

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 2018

    (Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co. (1995) 11 Cal.4th 1049, 1055; Schmidt v. Retirement Board (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1204, 1210.) … (Totten v. Board of Supervisors (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 826, 838 (Totten).)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Agric. Labor Relations Bd. v. Superior Court of San Benito Cty.

    29 Cal. App. 4th 688 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1994

    “In the liability phase, the Board issues an order adjudicating whether or not the Act has been violated, but does not determine the extent of the employer’s liability.” (George Arakelian Farms, Inc. v. … (Regal Knitwear Co. v. Board (1945) 324 U.S. 9, 15 [ 89 L.Ed. 661, 667 , 65 S.Ct. 478 ]; Labor Board v. Deena Artware (1960) 361 U.S. 398, 402-404 [ 4 L.Ed.2d 400, 404-405 , 80 S.Ct. 441 ].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Irwin v. City of Los Angeles

    3 Cal. App. 2d 495 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1935

    Under the authority of Donovan v. Board of Police Commissioners, 32 Cal. App. 392 , pages 399 and 400 [ 163 Pac. 69 ], and *498 Kramer v. Board of Police Commissioners, 39 Cal. … We have in mind the language used by the court in Cleu v. Board of Police Commissioners, 3 Cal. App. 174 [ 84 Pac. 672 ], and cited in Donovan v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • California Aviation Council v. County of Amador

    200 Cal. App. 3d 337 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1988

    In Friends of Mammoth v. … (Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 8 Cal.3d at p. 253, fn. 2 .) Subdivision (d) provides that section 21177 does not apply to the Attorney General.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • In Re Coordinated Latex Glove Litigation

    121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 301 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 2002

    (See Morson v. … A Comparison of Definitions of Product Defects: Manufacturing/Design As explained by the Supreme Court in Brown v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Albert Albek, Inc. v. Brock

    75 Cal. App. 2d 173 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1946

    (Carroll v. California Horse Racing Board, 16 Cal.2d 164 [ 105 P.2d 110 ]; Martin v. Board of Supervisors, 135 Cal.App. 96, 100 [26 P.2d 843]; Irvine v. … (Board of Trustees v. State Board of Equalization, 1 Cal.2d 784, 787 [ 37 P.2d 84 , 96 A.L.R. 775 ].)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hughes Manufacturing & Lumber Co. v. Wilcox

    13 Cal. App. 22 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1910

    (O’Connor v. Witherby, 111 Cal. 523 , [ 44 Pac. 227 ] ; Baines v. Babcock, 95 Cal. 581 , [ 29 Am. St. Rep. 158 , 27 Pac. 674 , 30 Pac. 776 ]; Abbott v. Jack, 136 Cal. 510 , [ 69 Pac. 257 ] ; Hurlburt v. … (Garretson v. Crude Oil Co., 146 Cal. 188 , [ 78 Pac. 838 ]; California S. Hotel Co. v. Callender, 94 Cal. 120 , [ 28 Am. St. Rep. 99 , 29 Pac. 859 ]; Pacific Fruit Co. v. Coon, 107 Cal. 447, 452 , [ 40 Pac. 542 ].)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Boliou v. Stockton Unified School District

    207 Cal. App. 4th 170 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 2012

    (See, e.g., Malloy v. Board of Education (1894) 102 Cal. 642, 647 [ 36 P. 948 ].) The resolution of that issue depends on the answers to two questions. … (Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School Dist. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 911, 916 [ 129 Cal.Rptr.2d 811 , 62 P.3d 54 ]; Radian Guaranty, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DeAryan v. Butler

    119 Cal. App. 2d 674 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1953

    XI, § § 6, 11; Boyd v. City of Sierra Madre, 41 Cal.App. 520 [ 183 P. 230 ]; Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ].) … (Hamilton v. Regents of The Uni *684 versity of Calif., 293 U.S. 245 [ 55 S.Ct. 197 , 79 L.Ed. 343 ]; West Virginia State Board of Education v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Fullerton v. International Sound Technicians of Motion Picture

    194 Cal. App. 2d 801 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 1961

    the board. … . & A.I.W. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 351 U.S. 266 [ 76 S.Ct. 794 , 100 L.Ed. 1162 ] (footnote 3, pp. 782, 783).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Curl v. Pacific Home

    108 Cal. App. 2d 655 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1952

    In Von Arx v. … Proc. § 416, and Gorman v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gallagher v. Foerst

    128 Cal. App. 466 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1932

    (McQuillin, supra, sec. 368; Kellar v. City of Los Angeles, 179 Cal. 605, 610 [ 178 Pac. 505 ]; Uhl v. Badaracco, 199 Cal. 270 [ 248 Pac. 917, 921, 922 ].) … (Fay Improvement Co. v. Hanlon, supra.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Benwell v. Lowery

    76 Cal. App. 2d 614 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1946

    In Wilson v. … Benwell v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Capen v. Shewry

    65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 890 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 2007

    (Armistead v. … (See Armistead v. State Personnel Board, supra, 22 Cal.3d 198 , and Tidewater, supra, 14 Cal.4th 557 .)

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Proctor v. San Francisco Port Authority

    266 Cal. App. 2d 675 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1968

    Any uncertainty can easily be made certain by reference to a dictionary (Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 153 Cal.App.2d 249 [ 314 P.2d 500 ]). … If an agency exceeds the limits of its enactment, it is usurping the legislative power, and any rule adopted thereby is invalid (Wallace v. State Personnel Board, 168 Cal.App.2d 543 [ 336 P.2d 223 ]).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Labachotte v. Morris

    41 Cal. App. 2d 430 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1940

    (People v. Southern Pacific Co., 209 Cal. 578 [ 290 Pac. 25 ]; Riley v. Thompson, 193 Cal. 773 [ 227 Pac. 772 ]; Riley v. Forbes, 193 Cal. 740 [ 227 Pac. 768 ] ; City of Pasadena v. … (See State v. Stonestreet, 99 Mo. 361 [ 12 S. W. 895 ] ; People v. Reinberg, 263 Ill. 536 [ 105 N. E. 715 , Ann. Cas. 1915C, 343, L. R. A. 1915E, 401]; State v. Williams, 222 Mo. 268 [ 121 S. W. 64 , 17 Ann.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Malibou Lake Mountain Club, Ltd. v. Robertson

    219 Cal. App. 2d 181 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 1963

    (Faulkner v. Faulkner, 148 Cal.App.2d 102, 108 [ 306 P.2d 585 ].) No such abuse appears here. … International Assn. of Machinists, 213 Cal.App.2d 817 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 190 ] ; Smetherham v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Wadsworth

    6 Cal. App. 3d 253 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1970

    (See Ferdig v. State Personnel Board, 71 Cal.2d 96, 104 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 224 , 453 P.2d 728 ].) … (See Waters v. Civil Service Board, 133 Cal.App.2d 733, 736 [ 284 P.2d 919 ].)

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.