Case law

San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. San Diego County Air Pollution Control District

203 Cal. App. 3d 1132 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 1988

(Ravettino v. … In Beaumont Investors v.

Marlin v. AIMCO VENEZIA, LLC

64 Cal. Rptr. 3d 488 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 2007

See City of Santa Monica v. … City of Cotati v. Cashman, supra, 29 Cal.4th at page 78. 16 Cf. Gallimore v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 1388, 1399 [ 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 560 ]. 17 Santa Monica Rent Control Bd. v.

Mission Peak Conservancy v. State Water Resources Control Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 2021

RG19037369) v. … It is simply an item on the board’s checklist. (Ibid.) If the department has set any conditions, the board must accept them. (Wat. Code, § 1228.6, subd. (a)(2); see Sierra Club v.

Burke v. City & County of San Francisco

258 Cal. App. 2d 32 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 1968

(Merckley v. Merckley, 12 Cal.2d 543, 547 [ 86 P.2d 89 ]). … We note, although we do not base our decision upon, the fact that San Francisco in 1967 appointed an assessment appeals board. That board will hereafter serve as the board of equalization (Const., art.

In Re Waters of Soquel Creek Stream System

79 Cal. App. 3d 682 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1978

CITY OF CAPITOLA, Petitioner and Respondent, v. CHY COMPANY et al., Claimants and Respondents; STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, Appellant. Docket No. 41457. … In Tulare Dist. v.

Lapp v. Superior Court

205 Cal. App. 2d 56 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1962

(Saxton v. Board of Education of Los Angeles City School District, 206 Cal. 758 [ 276 P. 998 ].) … (Mattos v. Superior Court, 30 Cal.App.2d 641 [ 86 P.2d 1056 ]; Jones v. Superior Court, 88 Cal.App. 253 [ 262 P. 1098 ], See Times Mirror Co. v.

Wallace v. Regents of University

75 Cal. App. 274 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 1925

(Abell v. Clark, 84 Cal. 226 [ 24 Pac. 383 ]; French v. Davidson, 143 Cal. 658 [ 77 Pac. 663 ]; State Board of Health v. Board of Trustees, 13 Cal. App. 514 [ 110 Pac. 137 ].) … He was denied the relief prayed for (Williams v. Wheeler, 23 Cal. App. 619 [ 138 Pac. 937 ]).

County of Los Angeles v. Farnsworth

4 Cal. App. 2d 516 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 13, 1935

The following, among other cases, are cited: International Mortgage Bank v. Eaton, 39 Cal. App. 39 [ 177 Pac. 880 ]; Royer v. Kelly, 174 Cal. 70 [ 161 Pac. 1148 ]; Richardson v. … Lamp, 209 Cal. 668 [ 290 Pac. 14 ]; Field v. Austin, 131 Cal. 379 [ 63 Pac. 692 ]; Gardner v. Watson, 170 Cal. 570 [ 150 Pac. 994 ].

People v. Hickman

31 Cal. App. 2d 4 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1939

In Rosenlhal v. … In People v. Novo, 12 Cal.

People v. Tamborrino

215 Cal. App. 3d 575 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1989

Defendant told police his name was Cliff Brown, and was booked under that name. … However, there is no evidence that she had ever seen Eddie Brown, knew Eddie Brown or knew of any claimed relationship between defendant and Eddie Brown.

Merrill Elementary School District v. Rapose

125 Cal. App. 2d 819 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 1954

(Pass School Dist. v. Hollywood City School Dist., 156 Cal. 416, 418, 420 [ 105 P. 122 , 20 Ann.Cas. 87, 26 L.R.A.N.S. 485 ].) … The only contention of Merrill is that an agreement between its board of trustees and the board of trustees of Corning is necessary to annexation. Admittedly, no such agreement was executed.

Dole Food Co. v. Superior Court

242 Cal. App. 4th 894 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 2015

(Erreca’s v. … Developer Defendants contend that two decisions, Knox v. County of Los Angeles (Knox) (1980) 109 Cal.App.3d 825, and Alcal Roofing & Insulation v.

Melone v. Industrial Accident Commission

9 Cal. App. 2d 569 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1935

Cas. 1917E, 390]; Western Indemnity Co. v. Pillsbury, 172 Cal. 807 [ 159 Pac. 721 ] ; Claremont Country Club v. Industrial Acc. Com., 174 Cal. 395 [ 163 Pac. 209 , L. R. A. 1918F, 177]; Brown v. Industrial Acc. … (Brown v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra.) The award was properly made and is, therefore, affirmed. Houser, P. J., and York, J., concurred.

People v. Flint

180 Cal. App. 3d 13 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1986

The police soon arrived and the witness told them "that a black man wearing a brown leather jacket, blue jeans, brown heavy boots with a medium natural had just left his alleyway about a minute ago." … Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 [ 48 Cal. Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ]; and see, People v. Hannon (1971) 5 Cal.3d 330, 338 [ 96 Cal. Rptr. 35 , 486 P.2d 1235 ]; Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Morse (1970) 6 Cal.

Gunn v. Fontes

148 Cal. App. 2d 351 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1957

Co. v. … (Garrison v. Edward Brown & Sons, 25 Cal.2d 473, 478 [ 154 P.2d 377 ]; Estate of Kerr, 127 Cal.App.2d 521, 523-524 [ 274 P.2d 234 ].)

California Teachers Assn. v. Ingwerson

46 Cal. App. 4th 860 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1996

(Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 442 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 777 P.2d 610 ]; accord Santa Clara County Counsel Attys. Assn. v. … (Lee v. Board of Civil Service Comrs. (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 103, 108 [ 270 Cal.Rptr. 47 ]; Cosgrove v. County of Sacramento (1967) 252 Cal.App.2d 45, 50-51 [ 59 Cal.Rptr. 919 ].)

Judson Pacific-Murphy Corp. v. Durkee

144 Cal. App. 2d 377 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 1956

Harney, Inc. v. Durkee, 107 Cal.App.2d 570 [ 237 P.2d 561 , 31 A.L.R.2d 457 ] ; see also Stanley-Taylor Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 135 Cal. 486 [67 P. 783]; Laurent v. … We do know, and of this fact the court can take judicial notice (McPheeters v. Board of Medical Examiners, 74 Cal.App.2d 46 [ 168 P.2d 65 ]) that until late in 1951 the American Bridge Company did have a license.

People v. Smith

128 Cal. App. 2d 706 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1954

(People v. Russell, 34 Cal.App.2d 665 [ 94 P.2d 400 ]; People v. Taylor, 4 Cal.App.2d 214 [ 40 P.2d 870 ]; People v. Russell, 120 Cal.App. 622 [ 8 P.2d 209 ].) … {People v. Casillas, 60 Cal.App.2d 785 [ 141 P.2d 768 ].)

Sharp v. Joint Highway District No. 6

111 Cal. App. 81 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 1931

and that he has had all of the notice that the law requires (Gadd v. … App. 347, 363 [ 231 Pac. 754 ]; Allied Amusement Co. v. Bryan, 201 Cal. 316 [ 256 Pac. 1097 ]). Furthermore, the power to build and pay for-roads is one of the powers which is vested in the local board of supervisors.

Citizen Action to Serve All Students v. Thornley

222 Cal. App. 3d 748 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 1990

(Perley v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 424, 435, fn. 6, 436 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 53 ].) Third, appellants urge an adverse impact on public transportation. … Assuming this is a requirement (but see, Perley v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 137 Cal.App.3d at p. 431 ), this applies only to mitigation of significant environmental effects.