Case law

Horton v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank

86 Cal. App. 2d 680 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1948

from acting as the board after an election has taken place. … Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32 [ 61 S.Ct. 115 , 85 L.Ed. 22 , 132 A.L.R. 741 ], is in point.

People Ex Rel. Smith v. Gunn

30 Cal. App. 114 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1916

In People v. … Wells, 2 Cal. 198 ; Christy v. Board of Supervisors, 39 Cal. 3 .) Respondent claims that the case of People v.

Doe v. Lincoln Unified School District

188 Cal. App. 4th 758 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 2010

In Doe v. … (Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 443 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 111 P.2d 610 ], italics added.)

Lees v. Bay Area Air Pollution Control District

238 Cal. App. 2d 850 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1965

Lines v. Public Utilities Com., 35 Cal.2d 586, 592 [ 220 P.2d 393 ]; 2 Witkin, Cal. *854 Procedure (1954) Trial, § 119, p. 1851, and cases cited.) In Pry Corp. of America v. … (Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500, 174 Cal. 622, 639 [ 163 P. 1024 ].)

Perea v. Fales

39 Cal. App. 3d 939 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1974

Only one of the authorities, Boutwell v. … In Morrison v.

In re Jones

California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 2019

Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 328, italics omitted.) … Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 328.)

People v. Tamborrino

215 Cal. App. 3d 575 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1989

Defendant told police his name was Cliff Brown, and was booked under that name. … However, there is no evidence that she had ever seen Eddie Brown, knew Eddie Brown or knew of any claimed relationship between defendant and Eddie Brown.

Renna v. County of Fresno

92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 586 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 2000

Citing Bratt v. … (Nichols v. Hurley, supra, at p. 1110.) In Teneyuca v.

Ireland v. Riley

11 Cal. App. 2d 70 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1935

In the case of Niceley v. County of Madera, 111 Cal. … In the language of the court, County of Inyo v. Hess, 53 Cal.

Union Bank & Trust Co. v. County of Los Angeles

2 Cal. App. 2d 600 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1934

Monterey County, 76 Cal. 113 [ 18 Pac. 135 ] ; Webster v. Board of Education, 140 Cal. 331 [ 73 Pac. 1070 ] ; More v. Board of Supervisors, 31 Cal. App. 388 [ 160 Pac. 702 ] ; Hammond Lumber Co. v. Moore, 104 Cal. … (Dewey v. Board of Supervisors of Niagara County, 62 N. Y. 294 ; Gray v. Board of Supervisors of Tompkins County, 93 N. Y. 603 ; Estep v. Koekuk County, 18 Iowa, 199 ; Randles v. Waukesha County, 96 Wis. 629 [ 71 N.

City of Oxnard v. Bellah

21 Cal. App. 33 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1913

There is presented no question with relation to the renewal of an existing indebtedness by new evidence, which question was before the court in the case of City of Los Angeles v. … It is a matter for determination by the board of trustees after authority to issue is given. (City of Santa Barbara v. Davis, 6 Cal.

Watts v. Oak Shores Community Assn.

235 Cal. App. 4th 466 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 2015

In fact, courts have given deference to board decisions that do not concern ordinary maintenance. Thus, for example, in Dolan-King v. … Board members also testified that Board meetings agenda and minutes were posted on the Association's website. Watts has waived the contention on appeal. (Foreman & Clark Corp. v.

McQuaide v. Enterprise Brewing Co.

14 Cal. App. 315 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1910

(Winterfield v. Cream City Brewing Co., 96 Wis. 239 , [ 71 N. W. 101 ]; National Brewing Co. v. Ahlgreen, 63 Ill. App. 475 ; Standard Brewery v. Kelly, 66 Ill. App. 267 ; Koehler & Co. v. Reinheimer, 26 App. … Supp. 755 ]; Glass v. Heim Brewing Co., 47 Mo. App. 639 .) The judgment is affirmed. Kerrigan, J., and Hall, J., concurred.

Hydro Co. v. Elsinore Valley Mun. Water Dist. CA4/1

California Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 2015

(Brown v. Grimes (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 265, 277 (Brown).) "Normally the question of whether a breach of an obligation is a material breach, so as to excuse performance by the other party, is a question of fact." … (See Brown, supra, 192 Cal.App.4th at p. 277.)

Alba v. Los Angeles Unified School District

140 Cal. App. 3d 997 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 1983

(Shoban v. Board of Trustees (1969) 276 Cal.App.2d 534, 546 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 112 ].) 2. … (See Lucas, supra, 13 Cal.3d at pp. 681-683 and Homer v. Board of Trustees (1964) 61 Cal.2d 79 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 185 , 389 P.2d 713 ].) 5.

City of Dublin v. County of Alameda

14 Cal. App. 4th 264 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1993

XI, § 7; Stirling v. Board of Supervisors (1975) 48 Cal.App.3d 184, 187 [ 121 Cal.Rptr. 435 ]; City of South San Francisco v. Berry (1953) 120 Cal.App.2d 252, 253 [ 260 P.2d 1045 ].) … Partnership v.

County of Kern v. Sparks

56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 551 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 2007

(County of Riverside v. Superior Court (2003) 30 Cal.4th 278, 285 [ 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 713 , 66 P.3d *17 718].) Thus, here, it was up to the Board, not Sparks, to set the salary for a commander. … (Adkins v. State of California (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 1802, 1818 [ 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 59 ], disapproved on another point in City of Moorpark v.

Mapstead v. Anchundo

63 Cal. App. 4th 246 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 1998

Browne v. Russell (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th ,1116, 1125 [ 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 29 ]; Dodge v. Free (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 436, 444 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 311 ].) … In Board of Supervisors v.

People v. Holguin

145 Cal. App. 2d 520 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1956

It is true, as stated in Badillo v. … As was said in People v.

Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of Inyo

172 Cal. App. 3d 151 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1985

(No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 13 Cal.3d at p. 83, quoting Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 8 Cal.3d at p. 259 .) … (Brennan v. Board of Supervisors, supra, at p. 197, quoting Woodland Hills Residents Assn., Inc. v. City Council, supra, at p. 941.)