Case law

People v. Rissman

143 Cal. App. 2d 488 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1956

Such practice was approved in People v. Adams, 137 Cal.App.2d 660 [ 290 P.2d 944 ] ; People v. Chamberlain, 96 Cal.App.2d 178 [ 214 P.2d 600 ] ; People v. Sears, 124 Cal.App.2d 839, 853 [ 269 P.2d 683 ].) … (People v. Nathanson, 134 Cal.App.2d 43, 45 [ 284 P.2d 975 ] ; McFarland v. Superior Court, 88 Cal.App.2d 153, 158-159 [ 198 P.2d 318 ].)

People v. Holguin

145 Cal. App. 2d 520 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1956

It is true, as stated in Badillo v. … As was said in People v.

Worth v. Downey

74 Cal. App. 436 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1925

Each of these petitions was certified as sufficient by the clerk of said board and submitted to said board of trustees. … (Conn v. City Council, supra; Locher v. Walsh, 17 Cal. App. 727 [121 Pac. 712]; Osborn v. Board of Supervisors, 27 Cal. App. 85 [ 148 Pac. 970 ].)

Jackson v. City of Los Angeles

81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 814 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1999

(Holcomb v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 210 Cal.App.3d at p. 1566 ; White v. County of Sacramento (1982) 31 Cal.3d 676, 683 [ 183 Cal.Rptr. 520 , 646 P.2d 191 ].) … (Bag gett v. Gates (1982) 32 Cal.3d 128, 140 [ 185 Cal.Rptr. 232 , 649 P.2d 874 ].)

Rodriguez v. Municipal Court

25 Cal. App. 3d 521 · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1972

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), J. … State Board of Education (1955) 137 Cal.App.2d 733, 735 [ 290 P.2d 890 ]; Baumgardner v. City of Hawthorne (1951) 104 Cal.App.2d 512, 517 [ 231 P.2d 864 ]).

Sunset Greens Homeowners Assn. v. Spagenski CA4/1

California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 2021

(City of Morgan Hill v. Brown (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1114, 1121.) … (LaChapelle v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp. (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 977, 981; Brown v.

Robins v. County of Los Angeles

248 Cal. App. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1966

(Daniel v. Board of Police Commissioners, 190 Cal.App.2d 566, 571 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 226 ].) … (See Daniel v. Board of Police Commissioners, supra, 190 Cal.App.2d 566 .)

Las Posas Valley Water etc. v. Ventura County Waterworks etc.

California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 2026

Brown concluded there was no surplus available for appropriation. … (Robinson v. Superior Court (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 1144, 1162.) A “public agency” “includes any state agency, board, or commission and any local or regional agency, as defined in these guidelines.

Professional Travel, Inc. v. Kalish & Rice, Inc.

199 Cal. App. 3d 762 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1988

Shoe Co. v. … The petition of respondent Earle Palmer Brown Company for review by the Supreme Court was denied June 1, 1988. 1 Although Kalish & Rice, Inc., and the Earle Palmer Brown Company were named as separate defendants in the complaint

Santa Barbara Federation of Teachers, Local 1081 v. Santa Barbara High School District

76 Cal. App. 3d 223 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1977

Both school districts are governed by the same board of education (see Santa Barbara School District v. … Board of Trustees (1935) 5 Cal.App.2d 64, 68 [ 42 P.2d 397 ]; Sherman v. Board of Trustees (1935) 9 Cal.App.2d 262, 265-266 [ 49 P.2d 350 ]; 43 Cal.Jur.2d (rev.) Schools, § 458, p. 842.)

Miller v. City of Los Angeles

169 Cal. App. 4th 1373 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 2008

In Johnson v. … Later, in Schifando v.

Simon v. Walt Disney World Co.

8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 459 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 2004

In McGettigan v. … The plaintiff in Falls v. San Francisco etc. R. R. Co., supra, 97 Cal. 114 , had gone so far as to accept an offer of carriage by boarding the defendant’s platform to ride a train, but no common carrier liability arose.

In Re Marriage of Shea

111 Cal. App. 3d 713 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1980

(1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 851 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 , 94 A.L.R.3d 164 ]; Polk v. … Accordingly, fringe benefits are community property to the extent they are earned by employment during marriage (In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d 838, 842 (retirement benefits); Patillo v.

Albert Albek, Inc. v. Brock

75 Cal. App. 2d 173 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1946

(Carroll v. California Horse Racing Board, 16 Cal.2d 164 [ 105 P.2d 110 ]; Martin v. Board of Supervisors, 135 Cal.App. 96, 100 [26 P.2d 843]; Irvine v. … (Board of Trustees v. State Board of Equalization, 1 Cal.2d 784, 787 [ 37 P.2d 84 , 96 A.L.R. 775 ].)

CALIFORNIA ST. AUTO. ASSN. INTER-INS v. Garamendi

6 Cal. App. 4th 1409 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1992

A reviewing court will not substitute its policy judgment for the agency's in the absence of an arbitrary decision...." ( Western Oil & Gas Assn. v. Air Resources Board (1984) 37 Cal.3d 502, 509 [ 208 Cal. … Board of Chiropractic Examiners (1948) 87 Cal. App.2d *1423 98, 101 [ 196 P.2d 77 ].)

In Re Bustos

4 Cal. App. 4th 851 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1992

(In re Nickles (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 415, 417-424 [ 282 Cal.Rptr. 411 ]; People v. Gibbs (1991) 228 Cal.App.3d 420,424-425 [ 278 Cal.Rptr. 338 ]; People v. … Goodson (1990) 226 Cal.App.3d 277, 280-281 [ 277 Cal.Rptr. 60 ]; People v. Huff (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 1100, 1103-1105 [ 273 Cal.Rptr. 44 ]; People v. Odom (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 907, 910-911 [ 259 Cal.Rptr. 827 ].)

Wisuri v. Newark Sch. Dist. of Alameda Cty.

247 Cal. App. 2d 239 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1966

(Wolstenholme v. City of Oakland, 54 Cal.2d 48, 50 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 153 , 351 P.2d 321 ] ; Newman v. Board of Civil Service Comrs., 140 Cal.App.2d 907, 909 [ 296 P.2d 41 ] ; Kicks v. … Board of Police Comrs., 32 Cal.App. 392 [ 163 P. 69 ] [16 months]; Newman v. Board of Civil Service Comrs., supra, 140 Cal.App.2d 907 [18 months], and Jones v.

Health Maintenance Network v. Blue Cross of Southern California

202 Cal. App. 3d 1043 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 1988

the board. … (Day v. Rosenthal (1985) 170 Cal.App.3d 1125, 1148-1149 [ 217 Cal.Rptr. 89 ].) 23 Cases relied upon by appellant are not on point. For example, in Pennix v.

In re Davidson

207 Cal. App. 4th 1215 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 2012

This is an appeal by the Board of Parole Hearings (Board) from a superior court order granting petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. … (See People v. Watson (1981) 30 Cal.3d 290, 300 [ 179 Cal.Rptr. 43 , 637 P.2d 279 ] [the leading decision on this theory of second degree murder].) We affirmed the conviction in a nonpublished opinion (People v.

Service Employees International Union v. County of Sonoma

227 Cal. App. 4th 1168 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 2014

Union v. Board of Trustees (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 1661, 1665.) B. … (San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 577, followed in Miller v. Superior Court (1999) 21 Cal.4th 883, 895.)