Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.95s

  • Work v. Central Union High School District

    6 Cal. App. 2d 626 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1935

    In Bland v. Board of Trustees, 67 Cal. … In Cullen v. Board of Education, 126 Cal.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Imperial County v. Garey

    61 Cal. App. 439 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1923

    In Felt v. … A. 356 ]; Gardner v. School District, 34 Okl. 716 *445 [ 126 Pac. 1018 ]; Hawhins v. Bare, 63 W. Va. 431 [ 60 S. E. 391 ]; Dahnke v. People, 168 Ill. 102 [39 L. R A. 197, 48 N. E. 137]; Stockett v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Klose v. Superior Court

    96 Cal. App. 2d 913 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1950

    (People v. Olds, 3 Cal. 167 [58 Am.Dec . 398] [mandate for records of office]; People v. Scannell, 7 Cal. 432 [mandate for records of office] ; Meredith v. Board of Supervisors, 50 Cal. 433 [mandate for pay] ; Kelly v. … (Morton v. Broderick, 118 Cal. 474 [ 50 P. 644 ] [mandate for pay, rival boards of supervisors]; McKannay v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • O'Brien v. Olson

    42 Cal. App. 2d 449 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1941

    (State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court, 9 Cal. (2d) 252 [ 70 Pac. (2d) 482 ]; Traffic Truck *458 Sales Co. v. Justice’s Court, 192 Cal. 377 [ 220 Pac. 306 ].) … (Garvin v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In re Ricardo P. CA2/7

    California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 2014

    APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Kevin Brown, Judge. Vacated and remanded with directions. Esther R. … (See People v. Farell (2002) 28 Cal.4th 381, 384, fn. 2 [record of court’s oral pronouncement controls over clerk’s minute order]; People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Richman v. Bank of Perris

    73 Cal. App. 321 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1925

    (See, also, Harding v. Vandewater, 40 Cal. 77 ; Thompson v. Williams, 76 Cal. 155 [ 9 Am. St. Rep. 187 , 18 Pac. 153 ]; Smith v. Dorn, 96 Cal. 82 [ 30 Pac. 1024 ]; Beatty v. Rianda, 34 Cal. … App. 180 [ 167 Pac. 185 ]; Raisch v. M. K. T. Oil Co., 7 Cal. App. 667 [ 95 Pac. 662 ]; Curtin v. Salmon River etc., 130 Cal. 348 [ 80 Am. St. Rep. 132 , 62 Pac. 552 ]; Cheney v. Canfield, 158 Cal. 345 [32 L. R. A. (N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gately v. Cloverdale Unified School District

    67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 377 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 2007

    (See Coburn v. Sievert (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 1483, 1492 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 596 ]; Walker v. Allstate Indemnity Co. (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 750, 754 [ 92 Cal.Rptr.2d 132 ].) … Employees Assn. v. Pasadena Unified Sch. Dist. (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 318, 322 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Purviance v. Compton

    94 Cal. App. 277 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 1928

    However, in Brecheen v. … (Barendt v. McCarthy, 160 Cal. 680 [ 118 Pac. 228 ]; Town of Susanville v. Long, 144 Cal. 362 [ 77 Pac. 987 ]; People v. Board of Supervisors, 75 Cal. 179 [ 16 Pac. 776 ]; Randolph v. County of Stanislaus, 44 Cal.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Riley

    65 Cal. App. 181 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 1924

    In the decision of the Farrell case, the case of Ford v. Board of Harbor Commrs., 81 Cal. 19 [ 22 Pac. 278 ], was taken up and considered. … (Ford v. Harbor Commissioners, 81 Cal. 37 [ 22 Pac. 278 ]; Farrell v. Board of Trustees, 85 Cal. 415 [ 24 Pac. 868 ].)

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Environmental Law Foundation v. State Water Resources Control Bd.

    California Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 2023

    State Water Resources Control Board (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 866, 879; Fukuda v. … (People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Smith

    132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 230 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 2003

    (See U.S. v. Trala, supra, 162 F.Supp.2d at p. 343 ; People v. Brown (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 623, 634 [ 110 Cal.Rptr.2d 750 ] [substructures].) … (People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 530 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 ]; People v. Axell, supra, 235 Cal.App.3d at p. 854 ; People v. Smith (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 19, 25 [ 263 Cal.Rptr. 678 ]; People v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Ashburn v. AIG Financial Advisors, Inc.

    234 Cal. App. 4th 79 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 6, 2015

    Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394 (Rosenthal); Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 938 (Brown); Hotels Nevada v. L.A. … Securities Corp.[, supra,] 14 Cal.4th 394, Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.[, supra,] 168 Cal.App.4th 938, or Hotels Nevada v. L.A. Pacific Center, Inc. [, supra,] 144 Cal.App.4th 754.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Huck v. Rathjen

    66 Cal. App. 84 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1924

    In considering the provisions of the California Water Storage District Act (Stats. 1921, p. 1727) in Tarpey v. … In support of his contention respondent cites McGregor v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • County of Santa Cruz v. State Bd. of Forestry

    64 Cal. App. 4th 826 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1998

    Society v. … . v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Twentieth Century-Fox Film v. Workers'comp.

    141 Cal. App. 3d 778 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1983

    Rptr. 560 TWENTIETH CENTURY-FOX FILM CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and KEVIN CONWAY, Respondents. Docket No. 65903. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. … review by providing the court with the principles relied on by the Board. ( Goytia v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Hubbard & Johnson Lumber Co.

    149 Cal. App. 2d 236 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1957

    (Kenney v. Grogan, 17 Cal.App. 527, 533 [ 120 P. 433 ] ; Rockwood & Co. v. Parrott & Co., 142 Ore. 261 [ 19 P.2d 423 ] (Oregon); I Williston on Sales 486, §243). … The case of Tremeroli v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Noggle

    7 Cal. App. 2d 14 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1935

    With respect to the right of a hearing and the limitation of the discretion of a board of supervisors in granting a liquor license, it was said in Martin v. Board of Supervisors, 135 Cal. … State Board of Public Roads, 47 R. I. 258 [ 131 Atl. 641 ], and Burgess v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Brockton, 235 Mass. 95 [ 126 N. E. 456 ].

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Minney v. City of Azusa

    164 Cal. App. 2d 12 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1958

    It is so held in Rubin v. Board of Directors, 16 Cal. 2d 119 [ 104 P.2d 1041 ]. … (Johnston v. Board of Supervisors, 31 Cal.2d 66, 73 [ 187 P.2d 686 ]; Hopkins v. MacCulloch, 35 Cal.App.2d 442, 450 [ 95 P.2d 950 ]; Meyers v. Board of Supervisors, 110 Cal.App.2d 623, 630 [ 243 P.2d 38 ]; Wheeler v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Gibson v. Twaddle

    1 Cal. App. 126 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1905

    (People v. Stewart, 132 Cal. 285 , [ 64 Pac. 285 ].) … (Pacheco v. Beck, 52 Cal. 7 ; Carlson v. Burt, 111 Cal. 131 , [ 43 Pac. 583 ].)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wilkinson v. Lund

    102 Cal. App. 767 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1929

    (Esberg v. Badaracco, 202 Cal. 110 [ 259 Pac. 730 ]; Nicholl v. Koster, 157 Cal. 416 [ 108 Pac. 302 ].) … (County of Sacramento v. Chambers, 33 Cal. App. 142, 149 [ 164 Pac. 613 ] ; Central Pac. Ry. Co. v. Costa, 84 Cal. App. 577, 586 [ 258 Pac. 991 ]; Watson v. Greely, 67 Cal. App. 328, 337 [ 227 Pac. 664 ].)

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.