Case law

Botka v. Sandra T.

40 Cal. App. 3d 633 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 12, 1974

Board of Education, 59 Cal.2d 203, 218 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 379 P.2d 4 ] [cert. den., 375 U.S. 823 ( 11 L.Ed.2d 56 , 84 S.Ct. 64 )]; In re Baby Boy T., 9 Cal.App.3d 815, 818 [ 88 Cal.Rptr. 418 ]; see People v. … (McCarthy v. Brown, 113 Cal. 15, 17-18 [ 45 P. 14 ]; Miller v. Gusta, 103 Cal.App. 32, 37-38 [ 283 P. 946 ].)

Paramount Rock Co., Inc. v. County of San Diego

194 Cal. App. 2d 409 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1961

(Paramount Rock Co. v. County of San Diego, supra.) … In Johnston v. Board of Supervisors, 31 Cal.2d 66 [ 187 P.2d 686 ], the ordinance made no provision for the board to grant a permit, and the board acted in excess of its jurisdiction. In Bandini Estate Co. v.

In Re Lisa E.

188 Cal. App. 3d 399 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1986

Co. v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1967) 247 Cal. App.2d 669 [ 55 Cal. Rptr. 810 ]. … Brown (G.A.), P.J., and Hamlin, J., concurred.

Trim, Inc. v. County of Monterey

86 Cal. App. 3d 539 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1978

In Knoff v. … (See Lilli Ann Corp. v.

Drovers National Bank v. Browne

88 Cal. App. 716 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1928

BROWNE." … In Mahana v.

El Yeager Const. v. Wcab

52 Cal. Rptr. 3d 133 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 28, 2006

YEAGER CONSTRUCTION, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and Dennis Gatten, Respondents. No. E038699. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Two. … This is because it is well established that any decision of the Board must be supported by substantial evidence. (§ 5952, subd. (d); Garza v. Workmen's Comp.App.

In Re Marriage of Freeman

45 Cal. App. 4th 1437 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1996

(Id. at p. 491; Hughes v. … (Clevenger v.

Rideout v. National Homestead Assn.

14 Cal. App. 349 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1910

(Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co., 100 Cal. 71 , [ 34 Pac. 527 ].) … upon the part of the other member of the board.

Fresno County Employees Ass'n v. Fresno County

242 Cal. App. 2d 828 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 1966

(See 40 Cal.Jur.2d, Public Officers, § 23, pp. 659-660; Ford v. Board of State Harbor Comrs., 81 Cal. 19 [ 22 P. 278 ]; cf. Boyd v. Huntington, 215 Cal. 473 [ 11 P.2d 383 ].) … (Placer County Employees Assn. v. Board of Supervisors, supra.)

Environmental Planning & Information Council of Western El Dorado County, Inc. v. County of El Dorado

131 Cal. App. 3d 350 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1982

The court in Karlson v. … (Greenstone area plan & EIR, p. v.)

Society for California Archaeology v. County of Butte

65 Cal. App. 3d 832 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1977

In People v. … San Francisco Ecology Center v.

McCaffrey v. Preston

154 Cal. App. 3d 422 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 1984

Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ]). In *431 validity must be clear and unquestionable before a statute can be declared unconstitutional (Santa Catalina Island Conservancy v. … Brown (Gerald), P.

New Capital for Small Businesses, Inc. v. Saunders

215 Cal. App. 2d 728 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1963

(Clark v. Child, 66 Cal. 87, 91 [ 4 P. 1058 ]; Brovelli v. Brovelli, 213 Cal.App.2d 16, 18-19 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 422 ].) … (Yeomans v. Lysfjord, 162 Cal.App.2d 357, 361 [ 327 P.2d 957 ] ; Fresno City High School Dist. v. Dillon, 34 Cal.App.2d 636, 642 [ 94 P.2d 86 ]; Brovelli v. Brovelli, supra-, 29 Cal. L.Rev. 254, 255.)

POET v. Air Resources Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 8, 2013

Brown, and Joshua J. Bettencourt for National Biodiesel Board and California Biodiesel Alliance as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, Matthew D. Zinn; Timothy J. … Brown (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 390, 405; Church v.

Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino

202 Cal. App. 3d 296 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1988

(Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].) In the land *310 mark decision No Oil, Inc. v. … (E.g., Heninger v. Board of Supervisors (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 601, 608 [231 Cal.Rptr. II]; Bowman v. City of Petaluma (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1065, 1071 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 413 ]; City of Antioch v.

In re Ricardo P. CA2/7

California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 2014

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Kevin Brown, Judge. Vacated and remanded with directions. Esther R. … (See People v. Farell (2002) 28 Cal.4th 381, 384, fn. 2 [record of court’s oral pronouncement controls over clerk’s minute order]; People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185.)

Gately v. Cloverdale Unified School District

67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 377 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 2007

(See Coburn v. Sievert (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 1483, 1492 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 596 ]; Walker v. Allstate Indemnity Co. (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 750, 754 [ 92 Cal.Rptr.2d 132 ].) … Employees Assn. v. Pasadena Unified Sch. Dist. (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 318, 322 .)

Ryan v. Riley

65 Cal. App. 181 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 1924

In the decision of the Farrell case, the case of Ford v. Board of Harbor Commrs., 81 Cal. 19 [ 22 Pac. 278 ], was taken up and considered. … (Ford v. Harbor Commissioners, 81 Cal. 37 [ 22 Pac. 278 ]; Farrell v. Board of Trustees, 85 Cal. 415 [ 24 Pac. 868 ].)

In Re Seabock

140 Cal. App. 3d 29 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1983

(Weaver v. … In Lindsey v.

People v. Beck

24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 228 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 2005

(d)(2) [count III, assault on Brown; count IV, assault on Rea; count V, assault on Guffey]). Alleged enhancements as to each count were as follows: three prior serious or violent felony convictions (§ 667, subd. … Yet even if the jury also rejected Rea’s account in favor of Brown’s as to count I, Brown’s testimony that defendant fired the gun in the general direction of the officers would have been sufficient to convict on count I