Case law

STATE BD. OF CHIRO. EXAM. v. Superior Court

55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 374 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2007

McDaniel v. Board of Education (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 1618, 1621-1622 , 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 448 [no hearing of any kind held].) … Quality Control Bd, v. Barry (1987) 194 Cal.App.3d 158 , 239 Cal.Rptr. 349 a state board declined to grant a petition for review of a regional board's decision.

Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of Inyo

172 Cal. App. 3d 151 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1985

(No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 13 Cal.3d at p. 83, quoting Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 8 Cal.3d at p. 259 .) … (Brennan v. Board of Supervisors, supra, at p. 197, quoting Woodland Hills Residents Assn., Inc. v. City Council, supra, at p. 941.)

Watts v. Oak Shores Community Assn.

235 Cal. App. 4th 466 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 2015

In fact, courts have given deference to board decisions that do not concern ordinary maintenance. Thus, for example, in Dolan-King v. … Board members also testified that Board meetings agenda and minutes were posted on the Association's website. Watts has waived the contention on appeal. (Foreman & Clark Corp. v.

Horton v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank

86 Cal. App. 2d 680 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1948

from acting as the board after an election has taken place. … Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32 [ 61 S.Ct. 115 , 85 L.Ed. 22 , 132 A.L.R. 741 ], is in point.

Ivory Education Institute v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife

California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 2018

Brown v. iMergent, Inc. (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 333, 339–340, quoting Schweitzer v. Westminster Investment (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1195, 1206.) … (Ibid. quoting Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180.)

Maganini v. Quinn

99 Cal. App. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1950

Appellant seeks to distinguish the holding in People v. Schwartz on the ground that the Board of Equalization there had executed a certificate of tax delinquency. … (Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co., 3 Cal.2d 427 [ 45 P.2d 183 ]; Bellon v. Silver Gate Theatres, Inc., 4 Cal.2d 1 [ 47 P.2d 462 ] ; Raggio v. Mallory, supra; Vosburgh v.

Kirkpatrick v. Civil Service Commission

77 Cal. App. 3d 940 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1978

Skelly Rights In Skelly v. … In Barber v.

McQuaide v. Enterprise Brewing Co.

14 Cal. App. 315 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1910

(Winterfield v. Cream City Brewing Co., 96 Wis. 239 , [ 71 N. W. 101 ]; National Brewing Co. v. Ahlgreen, 63 Ill. App. 475 ; Standard Brewery v. Kelly, 66 Ill. App. 267 ; Koehler & Co. v. Reinheimer, 26 App. … Supp. 755 ]; Glass v. Heim Brewing Co., 47 Mo. App. 639 .) The judgment is affirmed. Kerrigan, J., and Hall, J., concurred.

Menefee v. County of Fresno

163 Cal. App. 3d 1175 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1985

The defect is “jurisdictional” as to the board of supervisors. (Id., at p. 465.) As respondent Fresno County points out, Williams v. Bergin is distinguishable on its facts. … But no regulation or ordinance makes the county counsel’s opinion determinative or deprives the board of power to overrule the county counsel. Williams v.

County of Contra Costa v. Public Employees Union Local One

163 Cal. App. 4th 139 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2008

163 Cal.App.4th 139 (2008) COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL ONE, Defendant and Appellant; PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, Intervener and Appellant. … COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CALIFORNIA NURSES ASSOCIATION, Defendant; PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, Intervener and Appellant. No. A115095. No. A115118.

Tarquin v. Commission on Professional Competence

84 Cal. App. 3d 251 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1978

Dist. v. De Caristo, supra, 33 Cal.App.2d 666, 671 .) … Board of Education (1972) 6 Cal.3d 575, 587-588, fn. 7 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 16 , 493 P.2d 480 ]; Livermore Valley Joint Unified Sch. Dist. v. Feinberg, supra, 37 Cal.App.3d at p. 922 .)

Driver v. Melone

11 Cal. App. 3d 746 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 1970

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. Appellant, Bob J. Driver, purchased from respondents, Earl and Genevieve Melone, a parcel of land improved with an old and dilapidated house. … In Lingsch V.

Drovers National Bank v. Browne

88 Cal. App. 716 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1928

BROWNE." … In Mahana v.

El Yeager Const. v. Wcab

52 Cal. Rptr. 3d 133 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 28, 2006

YEAGER CONSTRUCTION, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and Dennis Gatten, Respondents. No. E038699. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Two. … This is because it is well established that any decision of the Board must be supported by substantial evidence. (§ 5952, subd. (d); Garza v. Workmen's Comp.App.

Riveros v. City of Los Angeles

41 Cal. App. 4th 1342 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1996

(Alexander v. Board of Trustees (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 567, 572 [ 188 Cal.Rptr. 705 ].) Discussion 1. … (See Baker v. Wadsworth (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 253, 261 [ 85 Cal.Rptr. 880 ].) Rules promulgated by such a board will bot be interfered with as long as they are reasonable and not capricious. (Water v.

Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Johnson

54 Cal. App. 2d 297 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 1942

(Hodge v. McCall, 185 Cal. 330, 334 [ 197 Pac. 86 ] ; Bodinson Mfg. Co. v. California Emp. Com., 17 Cal. (2d) 321, 325, 326 [ 109 P. (2d) 935 ].) … Co. v. Johnson, 8 Cal. (2d) 706 [ 68 P. (2d) 710 ]; Cypress Lawn etc. Assn. v. San Francisco, 211 Cal. 387, 390 [ 295 Pac. 813 ]; Miller v. McColgan, 17 Cal. (2d) 432 [ 110 P. (2d) 419 , 134 A. L. R. 1424].)

People v. Mitchell

244 Cal. App. 2d 176 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 1966

Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 398 P.2d 361 ], The more strict requirements of Miranda v. … Brown by the Citizens Advisory Committee to the Attorney General on Crime Prevention, March 26,1954).

Scharer v. San Luis Rey Equine Hospital, Inc.

204 Cal. App. 4th 421 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2012

(See Roos v. Loeser (1919) 41 Cal.App. 782 [ 183 P. 204 ]; Di Guilio v. … .”]; Wells v. Brown (1950) 97 Cal.App.2d 361, 365 [ 217 P.2d 995 ] [value of dog established by fair market value].)

Ireland v. Riley

11 Cal. App. 2d 70 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1935

In the case of Niceley v. County of Madera, 111 Cal. … In the language of the court, County of Inyo v. Hess, 53 Cal.

Rideout v. National Homestead Assn.

14 Cal. App. 349 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1910

(Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co., 100 Cal. 71 , [ 34 Pac. 527 ].) … upon the part of the other member of the board.