Case law

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United Rubber Workers

168 Cal. App. 2d 444 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 6, 1959

In other words, the board attempted to add to, subtract from or modify the contract of the parties in excess of the powers expressly conferred upon it. (See Crofoot v. … In Butte Miners’ Union No. 1 v.

Nork v. Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises, Inc.

73 Cal. App. 3d 410 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 1977

A tenant may not claim an earlier unrelated debt owed by the landlord as a setoff for past due rent (Ivory v. Brown, 137 Cal. 603, 605 [ 70 P. 657 ]). Being unrelated to the lease, it has no relevancy to possession. … The proposed setoff is irrelevant to the right of immediate possession and the superior court properly struck it (see Ivory v. Brown, supra, 137 Cal. 603 ).

POET v. Air Resources Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 8, 2013

Brown, and Joshua J. Bettencourt for National Biodiesel Board and California Biodiesel Alliance as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, Matthew D. Zinn; Timothy J. … Brown (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 390, 405; Church v.

Millview County Water Dist. v. State Water Res.

California Court of Appeal · Oct 14, 2014

(Cassidy v. … (Simons v.

Chenoweth v. Office of City Clerk

131 Cal. App. 2d 498 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1955

And evidence contrary to that supporting the conclusions of the board should be disregarded. (La Prade v. Department of Water & Power, 27 Cal.2d 47 [162 P.2d 13]; Pratt v. … Los Angeles County Civil Service Com., 108 Cal.App.2d 114 [ 238 P.2d 3 ]; Nunes v. Board of Civil Service Comrs., 88 Cal.App.2d 632 [ 199 P.2d 311 ].)

Wilkinson v. Lund

102 Cal. App. 767 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1929

(Esberg v. Badaracco, 202 Cal. 110 [ 259 Pac. 730 ]; Nicholl v. Koster, 157 Cal. 416 [ 108 Pac. 302 ].) … (County of Sacramento v. Chambers, 33 Cal. App. 142, 149 [ 164 Pac. 613 ] ; Central Pac. Ry. Co. v. Costa, 84 Cal. App. 577, 586 [ 258 Pac. 991 ]; Watson v. Greely, 67 Cal. App. 328, 337 [ 227 Pac. 664 ].)

Rudolph v. Athletic Commission

177 Cal. App. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 5, 1960

(See Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 6 Cal.2d 557, 559 [ 59 P.2d 119 ]; Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125, 131 [ 173 P.2d 545 ]; Weiss v. … State Board of Equalization, 40 Cal.2d 772, 775 [ 256 P.2d 1 ]; Boren v. State Personnel Board, 37 Cal.2d 634, 638 [ 234 P.2d 981 ]; Shepherd v. State Personnel Board, 48 Cal.2d 41, 46-47 [ 307 P.2d 4 ] Sandstrom v.

Lopez v. Tulare Joint Union High School District

34 Cal. App. 4th 1302 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1995

In Leeb v. … In Leeb v.

Taylor v. Forte Hotels International

235 Cal. App. 3d 1119 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1991

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) With these principles in mind we first turn to the meaning of the words “conversion” and “recovery.” … (Mateer v. Brown (1850) 1 Cal. 221, 227 .) He was liable for all injury or loss irrespective of negligence on his part, unless the cause was an act of God, public enemy, or negligence of the guest. (Pinkerton v.

Los Angeles Council of School Nurses v. Los Angeles Unified School District

113 Cal. App. 3d 666 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1980

. 4 In Amador Valley Secondary Educators Assn. v. … Similarly, in applying the principles as illustrated in San Diego Teachers Assn. v. Superior Court and Amador Valley Secondary Educators Assn. v.

Barr v. United Methodist Church

90 Cal. App. 3d 259 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1979

(Braunfeld v. Brown (1961) 366 U.S. 599, 603 [ 6 L.Ed.2d 563, 566 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 ]; Reynolds v. United States (1879) 98 U.S. 145 [ 25 L.Ed. 244 ].) … Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ] (environmental societies); California State University, Hayward v.

Alden v. Superior Court

212 Cal. App. 2d 764 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1963

before the board. … Board of Trustees, 109 Cal.App. 214, 217 [ 292 P. 985 ].) *770 Miller & Lux v.

Williams v. Sacramento River Cats Baseball Club, LLC

California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 2019

In June 2015, while plaintiff helped Brown in the visitor clubhouse as Brown’s guest, plaintiff witnessed a visiting team’s trainer and coach berate, intimidate, assault, and swear at Brown, who is African American, “as if … (Miklosy v.

New v. Kroeger

167 Cal. App. 4th 800 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 2008

John’s Parish’s governing board, and a new governing board should be elected. … (Maxwell v.

San Jose Teachers Ass'n, CTA, NEA v. Barozzi

230 Cal. App. 3d 1376 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1991

Speirs & Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s (1948) 84 Cal.App.2d 603, 604 [ 191 P.2d 124 ].) … (Telefilm, Inc. v. Superior Court (1949) 33 Cal.2d 289, 297 [ 201 P.2d 811 ].)

Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'n

2 Cal. App. 5th 674 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 2016

Board of Administration (1975) 47 Cal.App.3d 621, 632; cf. Allen v. … (Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell, supra, 290 U.S. 398, 435; Allen v. Board of Administration, supra, 34 Cal.3d 114, 119.)

Aas v. Avemco Insurance

55 Cal. App. 3d 312 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1976

The word ‘occupant’ means any person in, on or boarding the aircraft for the purpose of riding therein or alighting therefrom following a flight or attempted flight therein.” … (Ayer v. Boyle (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 822, 826-828 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 636 ]. See Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855, 882 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ].)

Dinan v. Superior Court

6 Cal. App. 217 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1907

In Croly v. … In Elder v.

BRV, INC. v. Superior Court

49 Cal. Rptr. 3d 519 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 2006

The public and the media smelled a “sweetheart deal” and demanded the board release the report. The board refused, and the trial court upheld the board’s decision. … No. 1-011 v.

CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.

230 Cal. App. 3d 1525 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 5, 1991

In early June 1987 the regional board “issued a letter to Monsanto and Hunter stating the Control Board’s [regional board’s] intent to issue a tentative order for the cleanup of TCE contamination on the Subject Property. … (Spellis v. Lawn, supra, 200 Cal.App.3d at p. 1079 ; cf. Carman v. Alvord (1982) 31 Cal.3d 318, 324 [ 182 Cal.Rptr. 506 , 644 P.2d 192 ]; E. L. White, Inc. v.