Case law

Smetherham v. Laundry Workers' Union, Local No. 75

44 Cal. App. 2d 131 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1941

In hearing and determining charges against a member of the organization, the executive board acts in a quasi-judicial capacity in administering the disciplinary laws and rules of the association. (McConville v. … (Hettinger v. Thiele, 15 Cal. App. 1 [ 113 Pac. 121 ].)

Ashford v. Culver City Unified School District

29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 728 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 2005

In Carlton v. … (Rose v.

Williams v. Wheeler

23 Cal. App. 619 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1913

to a similar rule enacted by the state legislature in 1889, and which has been passed upon approvingly in the following cases: Abeel v. … Clark, 84 Cal. 226 , [ 24 Pac. 383 ]; French v. Davidson, 143 Cal. 658 , [ 77 Pac. 663 ]; State Board of Health v. Board of Trustees, 13 Cal. App. 514 , [ 110 Pac. 137 ]. In the leading case of Abeel v.

Unger v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways

61 Cal. App. 125 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1923

The case of Dixon v. Finns, 98 Cal. 384 [ 35 Am. St. Rep. 180 , 20 L. R. … Brown and a jury. Judge Brown resigned his judicial position after the trial of the cause but before the motion for a new trial had been brought on to hearing.

Lomeli v. Department of Corrections

134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 179 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2003

We said in City of Oakland v. … Co. v. Nakano (1939) 12 Cal.2d 711, 713-714 [ 87 P.2d 700 , 121 A.L.R. 417 ]; McKee v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. (1993) 15 Cal.App.4th 282, 285-287 [ 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 286 ]; Purdy v.

Faulkner v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

47 Cal. App. 3d 731 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1975

Pension Board, 75 Cal.App. 335 [ 242 P. 756 ]; Cordell v. City of Los Angeles, 67 Cal.App.2d 257, 266 [ 154 P.2d 31 ]; Baird v. City of Fresno, 97 Cal.App.2d 336, 340-341 [ 217 P.2d 681 ]; Thurston v. … In Phillipson v.

Tarquin v. Commission on Professional Competence

84 Cal. App. 3d 251 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1978

Dist. v. De Caristo, supra, 33 Cal.App.2d 666, 671 .) … Board of Education (1972) 6 Cal.3d 575, 587-588, fn. 7 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 16 , 493 P.2d 480 ]; Livermore Valley Joint Unified Sch. Dist. v. Feinberg, supra, 37 Cal.App.3d at p. 922 .)

Maganini v. Quinn

99 Cal. App. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1950

Appellant seeks to distinguish the holding in People v. Schwartz on the ground that the Board of Equalization there had executed a certificate of tax delinquency. … (Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co., 3 Cal.2d 427 [ 45 P.2d 183 ]; Bellon v. Silver Gate Theatres, Inc., 4 Cal.2d 1 [ 47 P.2d 462 ] ; Raggio v. Mallory, supra; Vosburgh v.

Simon v. Walt Disney World Co.

8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 459 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 2004

In McGettigan v. … The plaintiff in Falls v. San Francisco etc. R. R. Co., supra, 97 Cal. 114 , had gone so far as to accept an offer of carriage by boarding the defendant’s platform to ride a train, but no common carrier liability arose.

Cash v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2025

Graciano v. … (Chavez v. City of Los Angeles (2010) 47 Cal.4th 970, 985; Serrano v.

Palmer v. Financial Indemnity Co.

215 Cal. App. 2d 419 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1963

(Brown v. Guarantee Ins. Co., p. 683; Ivy v. Pacific Auto. Ins. Co., p. 659.) … (Brown v. Guarantee Ins. Co., p. 689; Hodges v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., supra, p. 574.)

Alpaugh Irrigation District v. County of Kern

113 Cal. App. 2d 286 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 1952

(Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125, 131 [ 173 P.2d 545 ].) In Universal Cons. Oil Co. v. Byram, 25 Cal.2d 353 , the Supreme Court said at pages 356 and 357 [ 153 P.2d 746 ]: “. . . … (City & County of San Francisco v.

Baillargeon v. Dep't of Water & Power of L.A.

69 Cal. App. 3d 670 · California Court of Appeal · May 11, 1977

In Strong v. … However, in Crumpler v.

Menefee v. County of Fresno

163 Cal. App. 3d 1175 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1985

The defect is “jurisdictional” as to the board of supervisors. (Id., at p. 465.) As respondent Fresno County points out, Williams v. Bergin is distinguishable on its facts. … But no regulation or ordinance makes the county counsel’s opinion determinative or deprives the board of power to overrule the county counsel. Williams v.

Sierra Club v. County of Napa

19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 2004

In Defend the Bay v. … (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.Sd 553, 569 [ 276 Cal.Rptr. 410 , 801 P.2d 1161 ] (Goleta II).)

Everett v. Howard Buick Co.

15 Cal. App. 2d 544 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 1936

(Montgomery v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 69 Cal. App. 251 [ 230 Pac. 993 ] ; Lampton v. Davis Standard Bread Co., 48 Cal. App. 116 [ 191 Pac. 710 ]; Saylor v. Taylor, 42 Cal. App. 474 [ 183 Pac. 843 ].) … Brown, another salesman, and asked him if the company ear assigned to Mr. Brown was *547 available for Mr.

Adler v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

174 Cal. App. 2d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1959

board. … (Const., art XX, § 22; Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, Sac. 7040, supra, ante [52 Cal.2d], page 238 [ 340 P.2d 1 ].)” (See also Rosales v.

Minish v. Hanuman Fellowship

214 Cal. App. 4th 437 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 2013

(Meyer v. State Board of Equalization (1954) 42 Cal.2d 376, 386 [ 267 P.2d 257 ]; Freidberg v. Freidberg (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 754, 761 [ 88 Cal.Rptr. 451 ]; Parker v. … Citing Munoz v.

People v. Kerns

9 Cal. App. 2d 72 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 3, 1935

Article I of chapter II thereof provides for the state board of health and section 2979 thereof is entitled: “Powers and duties of board”. … (People v. Beesly, 119 Cal. App. 82 [ 6 Pac. (2d) 114, 970 ]; People v. McGee, 107 Cal. App. 56 [ 290 Pac. 61 ]; People v. Seeley, 137 Cal. 13 [ 69 Pac. 693 ].)

People v. Gomez

181 Cal. App. 4th 1028 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 2010

In People v. … In People v.