Case law

Hoshour v. County of Contra Costa

203 Cal. App. 2d 602 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1962

Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 43 Cal.2d 121 [ 272 P.2d 4 ]; Hostetter v. Alderson, 38 Cal.2d 499 [ 241 P.2d 230 ] ; Triangle Ranch, Inc. v. Union Oil Co., 135 Cal.App.2d 428 [ 287 P.2d 537 ]; Floresta, Inc. v. … (Munns v. Stenman, 152 Cal.App.2d 543, 557, 558 [ 314 P.2d 67 ]; 1 Witkin, California Procedure, § 123, p. 387; § 148(b), p. 412.)

Stilwell v. Trutanich

178 Cal. App. 2d 614 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1960

App.2d 741, 748 [ 309 P.2d 91 ]; Goldberg v. Paramount Oil Co., 143 Cal. App.2d 215, 219 [ 300 P.2d 329 ]; Nelson v. Abraham, 29 Cal.2d 745, 749 [ 177 P.2d 931 ]; Brown v. Fairbanks, 121 Cal. … App.2d 529, 536 [ 227 P.2d 860 ]; Parker v. Trefry, 58 Cal. App.2d 69, 75 [ 136 P.2d 55 ]; Martter v. Byers, supra, 75 Cal. App.2d 375, 383 ; Brown v.

O'Neil v. Brode

40 Cal. App. 371 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 1919

(Williams v. McDonald, 58 Cal. 527 ; Pennington v. Baehr, 48 Cal. 565 ; Jansen v. McCahill, 22 Cal. 563 , [ 83 Am. Dec. 84 ].) [3] 3. … (Hayes v. Handley et al., 28 Cal. App. Dec. 592. [Decided by supreme court February 18, 1920, 187 Pac. 952 ).] [5] 4.

People v. Mihaly

95 Cal. App. 563 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1928

On May 1, 1928, a man by the name of Brown rented a private garage No. 7 connected with the Glenwood apartment house in the city of Oakland. … Jur., p. 259, sec. 322; People v. Stoll, 143 Cal. 689, 693 [ 77 Pac. 818 ].) The judgment and order are affirmed. Sturtevant, J., and Koford, P. J., concurred.

Dennis v. County of Santa Clara

215 Cal. App. 3d 1019 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 1989

A board of assessment appeals is “ ‘the sole judge of questions of fact and of the values of property.’ ” (Id. at p. 177.) As the court stated in Bank of America v. … Gilmore Co. v.

Chrisman v. City of Los Angeles

65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 701 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 2007

And in Perez v. … Finally, in Mahru v.

Perea v. Fales

39 Cal. App. 3d 939 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1974

Only one of the authorities, Boutwell v. … In Morrison v.

Hayman v. City of Los Angeles

17 Cal. App. 2d 674 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1936

App. 418 [ 83 Pac. 1081 ] ; Donovan v. Board of Police Commrs., 32 Cal. App. 392 [ 163 Pac. 69 ]; Cahill v. Superior Court, 145 Cal. 42 [ 78 Pac. 467 ]; Kramer v. Board of Police Commrs., 39 Cal. … In this connection see Donovan v. Board of Police Gommrs., supra, at page 400.

Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & Wildlife

237 Cal. App. 4th 411 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 2015

(Board of Trustees v. Judge (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 920, 927, fn. 4.) … (Medical Board v. Superior Court (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 163, 179; see J.A. Jones Construction Co. v.

Kirack v. City of Eureka

69 Cal. App. 2d 134 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1945

(Tharpe v. Sibley Lake Bisteneau & S. Ry. Co. … (George v. City of Los Angeles, 51 Cal.App.2d 311, 315 [ 124 P.2d 872 ]; Smith v. County of San Mateo, 62 Cal.App.2d 122, 128 [ 144 P.2d 33 ]; Silva v.

City of Santa Clara v. Santa Clara Unified School District

22 Cal. App. 3d 152 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1971

(Hall v. City of Taft (1956) 47 Cal.2d 177 [ 302 P.2d 574 ].) … As said in Kentucky Institution for Education of Blind v.

Renna v. County of Fresno

92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 586 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 2000

Citing Bratt v. … (Nichols v. Hurley, supra, at p. 1110.) In Teneyuca v.

Zakessian v. City of Sausalito

28 Cal. App. 3d 794 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 1972

(Bringle v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 54 Cal.2d 86, 90 .) … Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals, supra, 66 Cal.2d 767 , or Cow Hollow Improvement Club v. Board of Permit Appeals, 245 Cal.App.2d 160 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 610 ], which conflicts with our conclusion. In Broadway, Laguna etc.

Leenders v. California Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp.

59 Cal. App. 2d 752 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1943

In support of this statement defendant cites: Fanjoy v. Seales, 29 Cal. 243 ; Baddeley v. Shea, 114 Cal. 1 [ 45 P. 990 , 55 Am.St.Rep. 56 , 33 L.R.A. 747 ] ; Kalis v. … Defendant’s claim that the negligence of the steamship company was the sole proximate cause of the fall of the face board is based upon eases of which Hayden v.

In Re Lisa E.

188 Cal. App. 3d 399 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1986

Co. v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1967) 247 Cal. App.2d 669 [ 55 Cal. Rptr. 810 ]. … Brown (G.A.), P.J., and Hamlin, J., concurred.

People v. Denne

141 Cal. App. 2d 499 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 1956

(People v. Bagley, 133 Cal.App.2d 481, 484 [ 284 P.2d 36 ]; People v. Torres, supra; People v. Brickman, supra.) … Brown, 45 Cal.2d 640 [ 290 P.2d 528 ]; People v. Boyles, 45 Cal.2d 652 [ 290 P.2d 535 ]; People v. Simon, 45 Cal.2d 645 [ 290 P.2d 531 ]; People v. Michael, 45 Cal.2d 751 [ 290 P.2d 852 ]; People v.

Cal. Sch. Emps. Ass'n v. Pasadena Unified Sch. Dist.

71 Cal. App. 3d 318 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1977

(City and County of S.F. v. Boyd, 22 Cal.2d 685, 690 [ 140 P.2d 666 ]; Anderson v. Board of Supervisors, 229 Cal.App.2d 796, 798 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 541 ].) … The trial court came pretty close to the mark in stating that' it did not feel the board’s decision was reviewable unless the board acted in bad faith. (See Fuller v.

Hom v. Petrou

California Court of Appeal · Aug 3, 2021

(Brown Bark III, L.P. v. Haver (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 809, 818 (Brown Bark).) … (Brown Bark, supra, 219 Cal.App.4th at p. 828.)

Faulkner v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

47 Cal. App. 3d 731 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1975

Pension Board, 75 Cal.App. 335 [ 242 P. 756 ]; Cordell v. City of Los Angeles, 67 Cal.App.2d 257, 266 [ 154 P.2d 31 ]; Baird v. City of Fresno, 97 Cal.App.2d 336, 340-341 [ 217 P.2d 681 ]; Thurston v. … In Phillipson v.

City of Santa Cruz v. Superior Court

40 Cal. App. 4th 1146 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 1995

[Citation.]” (.Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court, supra, 32 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1626-1627.) *1155 Based on County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court, supra, and Board of Supervisors v. … (Wollen v. Fort Lee (1958) 27 NJ. 408 [ 142 A.2d. 881, 888 ].) Similarly, in Board of Supervisors v.