Case law

Johnston v. Rapp

103 Cal. App. 2d 202 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1951

Board of Trustees, 112 Cal.App. 296, 303 [ 296 P. 912 ]; Rible v. … Com. v.

Saffro v. Elite Racing, Inc.

119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 497 · California Court of Appeal · May 7, 2002

That same day, after completing the race, Saffro boarded a plane to return home to Chicago. Between 60 and 90 minutes into the flight, Saffro suffered a grand mal seizure, necessitating an emergency landing in St. … Brown, J., did not participate therein.

Salazar v. Diversified Paratransit, Inc.

126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 475 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 2003

(a), italics added; accord Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 37 Cal.3d at p. 486 , 208 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 691 P.2d 272 ; Aguilar v. … Board of Supervisors, [ supra , ] 8 Cal.3d [at pp.] 256-257 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].)" ( Tyrone v.

Gascon v. Superior Court

169 Cal. App. 2d 356 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1959

(People v. Brown, 45 Cal.2d 640 [ 290 P.2d 528 ]; People v. Simon, 45 Cal.2d 645, 650-651 [ 290 P.2d 531 ] ; People v. Harvey, 142 Cal.App.2d 728, 731 [ 299 P.2d 310 ].) … (People v. Harvey, supra; People v. Simon, supra; People v. Brown, supra.)

Hott v. College of the Sequoias Community College District

3 Cal. App. 5th 84 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 2016

(i).)‟ ” (Dixon v. Board of Trustees (1989) 216 Cal.App.3d 1269, 1277 (Dixon).) … (Kelly v. County of Los Angeles (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 910, 919; Snow v. Woodford (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 383, 393–394; Romo v.

People v. Kuder

93 Cal. App. 42 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1928

On the contrary, the presumption is that the board will not act unreasonably or unfairly. ’ ’ In Agnew v. … Board of Liquidation v. Briede, 117 La. 183 [ 41 South. 487 ].) It is a duty conferred by words or by implication upon an officer to look into facts and to act upon them in the exercise of discre *55 tion. (Bair v.

Valdes v. Cory

139 Cal. App. 3d 773 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1983

(Betts v. Board of Administration (1978) 21 Cal.3d 859, 863 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 158 , 582 P.2d 614 ]; Miller v. State of California (1977) 18 Cal.3d 808, 815-816 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 386 , 557 P.2d 970 ]; Kern v. … (See Sgaglione v. Levitt, supra, 337 N.E.2d 592 ; State Teachers’ Retirement Board v. Giessel, supra, 106 N.W.2d 301 ; cf. Whitmire v. City of Eureka (1972) 29 Cal.App.3d 28, 34 [ 105 Cal.Rptr. 185 ].)

CBGM v. Guralnick CA4/2

California Court of Appeal · Jan 5, 2023

Filed 1/5/23 CBGM v. … Eventually, Brown formed CBGM with a partner and completed the purchase in April 2015 for $5.1 million.

People v. Mihaly

95 Cal. App. 563 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1928

On May 1, 1928, a man by the name of Brown rented a private garage No. 7 connected with the Glenwood apartment house in the city of Oakland. … Jur., p. 259, sec. 322; People v. Stoll, 143 Cal. 689, 693 [ 77 Pac. 818 ].) The judgment and order are affirmed. Sturtevant, J., and Koford, P. J., concurred.

Barnhart v. Cabrillo Community College

90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 709 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 1999

board.’ … Union v. Board of Trustees, supra, 47 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1665-1666.)

Crittenden v. Superior Court

225 Cal. App. 2d 101 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 21, 1964

(Rose v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.App.2d 599 [ 112 P.2d 713 ]; Landtbom v. Board of Fire Comrs., 98 Cal.App. 629 [ 277 P. 369 ].) … Coughlin, J., and Brown, (Gerald), J., concurred.

McGrath v. Young

98 Cal. App. 2d 415 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 1950

That such settlement was not res judicata and was not binding on the pension board would seem obvious. The precise question was answered negatively in Schmidt v. … (Drummond v. Drummond, 39 Cal.App.2d 418 [ 103 P.2d 217 ].)

American Federation of Teachers v. Oakland Unified School District

251 Cal. App. 2d 91 · California Court of Appeal · May 17, 1967

Bules and regulations adopted by a board of education are, in effect, a part of a teacher’s employment contract and the teacher is entitled to their enforcement. (Heckley v. … Board of Education, 53 Cal.2d 218, 220-221 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 4 , 347 P.2d 4 ]; Rible v. Hughes, 24 Cal.2d 437, 443 [ 150 P.2d 455 , 154 A.L.R. 137 ]; Fry v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.2d 753, 760 [ 112 P.2d 229 ].)

Runsvold v. Runsvold

61 Cal. App. 2d 731 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1943

Code, sec. 138; Browning v. Browning, 111 Cal.App. 99, 102 [ 295 P. 360 ]; Bancroft v. Bancroft, 178 Cal. 352 [ 173 P. 582 ]; Taber v. Taber, 209 Cal. 755 [ 290 P. 36 ]; Young v. … (Citing 27 C.J.S. 1177; Wand v. Wand, 14 Cal. 512 ; Kettelle v. Kettelle, 110 Cal.App. 310 [ 294 P. 453 ]; Fay v. Fay, 12 Cal.2d 279 [ 83 P.2d 716 ] ; 9 Cal.Jur. 794, sec. 137.)

Harvey v. County of Butte

203 Cal. App. 3d 714 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 8, 1988

This theory is dependent upon the invalidity of the action of the Board and hence upon the claim that its action was ultra vires. Plaintiff relies solely upon Stanson v. … Hornblower v. Duden (1868) 35 Cal. 664, 670-671 ; Lassen County v. Shinn (1891) 88 Cal. 510 [ 26 P. 365 ].)

J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2015

(Jolly v. … Kendrick v.

Van De Veer v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

155 Cal. App. 2d 817 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 1957

(People v. Slobodion, 30 Cal.2d 362 [ 181 P.2d 868 ]; McDonald v. Lee, 132 Cal. 252 [ 64 P. 250 ]; Estes v. Chimes, 40 Cal.App.2d 41 [ 104 P.2d 74 ].) … (Poynor v. Commissioner of Int. Rev., 81 F.2d 521 ; see also, Louisiana Discount Corp. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev., 193 F.2d 495 ; Di Prospero v. Commissioner of Int. Rev., 176 F.2d 76 .)

People v. Fonseca

36 Cal. App. 4th 631 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1995

[Citation.]" ( People v. Brown, supra, 45 Cal.3d at p. 1261 .) The Brown court's comment has to be limited to the context of cross-examination of a defendant. It thus, like Boykin v. … Brown cites People v.

Rudnick v. Golden West Broadcasters

156 Cal. App. 3d 793 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1984

A directed verdict for the defense was affirmed in Brown v. … (Brown v. San Francisco Ball Club, supra, 99 Cal.App.2d 484 .)

RLH Industries, Inc. v. SBC Communications, Inc.

35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 469 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 2005

(Brown Shoe Co. v. United States (1962) 370 U.S. 294, 320 [ 8 L.Ed.2d 510 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 ].) … Healy (2d Cir. 1982) 692 F.2d 275 ; Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. N.Y. Liquor Auth. (1986) 476 U.S. 573 [ 90 L.Ed.2d 552 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 ] (Brown-Forman).)