Case law

Pacifica Corp. v. City of Camarillo

149 Cal. App. 3d 168 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1983

Board of Trustees (1896) 113 Cal. 664, 670 [ 45 P. 856 ]; Santa Ana Tustin Community Hospital v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 127 Cal.App.3d 644, 650 [ 179 Cal.Rptr. 620 ].) … Board of Trustees, supra, 113 Cal. at p. 669 ), the procedural characteristics of the administrative process (Patterson v. Central Coast Regional Com. (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 833, 841 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 169 ]; Rivera v.

Driver v. Melone

11 Cal. App. 3d 746 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 1970

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. Appellant, Bob J. Driver, purchased from respondents, Earl and Genevieve Melone, a parcel of land improved with an old and dilapidated house. … In Lingsch V.

Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist. v. STATE OF CALIF.

229 Cal. App. 3d 552 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1991

(See Ward v. Taggart (1959) 51 Cal.2d 736, 742 [ 336 P.2d 534 ]; Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of Supervisors (1971) 20 Cal.App.3d 1, 4 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 431 ].) … (Younger v. Superior Court (1978) 21 Cal.3d 102, 109 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 674 , 577 P.2d 1014 ]; see Governing Board v. Mann (1977) 18 Cal.3d 819, 829 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 558 P.2d 1 ].)

People v. Hy-Lond Enterprises, Inc.

93 Cal. App. 3d 734 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1979

(See Pitchess v. Superior Court (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 653, 657 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 41 ]; Galli v. Brown (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 764, 776-777 [ 243 P.2d 920 ]; Sloane v. … in any officer or Board, except perhaps the State Board of Equalization, to reduce the amount apportioned to any county.

People v. Bartlett

199 Cal. App. 2d 173 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1962

In McPheeters v. … (People v. Byars, 188 Cal.App.2d 794 [ 10 Cal.Rptr. 677 ]; People v. Schuber, 71 Cal.App.2d 773 [ 163 P.2d 498 ]; In re Martinez, 36 Cal.App.2d 687 [ 98 P.2d 528 ]; People v.

Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants LLC

231 Cal. App. 4th 328 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 2014

(Blank v. … Accordingly, the Association’s liability, if any, is 12 vicarious liability for the board’s failure to sue. (See Masters v.

Manson v. Shepherd

188 Cal. App. 4th 1244 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 3, 2010

The declaration of the Trust’s attorney, James V. … In Hasso v.

Ashdown v. State of California Department of Employment

135 Cal. App. 2d 291 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 1955

Rules with respect to judicial review, by mandamus, of an administrative proceeding are stated in Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal.2d 790 [ 136 P.2d 304 ]. … (Loew’s Inc. v. California Emp. Stab. Com., 76 Cal.App.2d 231 . 238 [ 172 P.2d 938 ].)

Demin v. Vanderford & Ruiz CA2/4

California Court of Appeal · May 20, 2014

(Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 438; Hudis v. Crawford (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1586, 1592.) … (See Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 49 Cal.3d at p. 438; Hudis v. Crawford, supra, 125 Cal.App.4th at p. 1592.)

Wollenberg v. Tonningsen

8 Cal. App. 2d 722 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 1935

Brown whereby a large part of the stock was to be held by Patton as trustee. … (Brown v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irr. Dist., 183 Cal. 186, 188 [ 190 Pac. 797 ]; Martin v. Hall, 219 Cal. 334, 339 [ 26 Pac. (2d) 288 ].)

Emden v. Verdi

124 Cal. App. 2d 555 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 1954

Appellant relies on Browning v. Evans, 217 Cal. 585 [ 20 P.2d 681 ], in support of her last proposition. It does not, however, go to the extent she claims. … Obviously the Browning case cannot be applicable in such circumstances.

County of Imperial v. Adams

117 Cal. App. 220 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1931

Bonds, sec. 211; People v. Treadway, 17 Mich. 480 ; Armington v. State, 45 Ind. 10 ; Mahaska Co. v. Ruan, 45 Iowa, 328 ; Kane v. Railroad, 5 Neb. 105 ; Fox v. … In Campbell v. People, 154 Ill. 595 [ 39 N.

Gear v. Webster

258 Cal. App. 2d 57 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 1968

Associations similar to the Bakersfield Board of Realtors, here involved, are not uncommon. In Lawson v. … In Robinson v.

Burbank v. Hamilton

63 Cal. App. 745 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1923

, and not afterward, and if, in such action, judgment is recovered for more than the board allowed on presentation of a certified copy of the judgment the board must allow and pay the same together with the costs adjudged … (Dufton v. Daniels, 190 Cal. 577 [ 213 Pac. 949 ], and eases cited therein.) Applying this test and paraphrasing the language used in Dufton v.

Cervantes v. Great American Insurance

140 Cal. App. 3d 763 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1983

In Unruh v. … (Serrano v.

Hoshour v. County of Contra Costa

203 Cal. App. 2d 602 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1962

Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 43 Cal.2d 121 [ 272 P.2d 4 ]; Hostetter v. Alderson, 38 Cal.2d 499 [ 241 P.2d 230 ] ; Triangle Ranch, Inc. v. Union Oil Co., 135 Cal.App.2d 428 [ 287 P.2d 537 ]; Floresta, Inc. v. … (Munns v. Stenman, 152 Cal.App.2d 543, 557, 558 [ 314 P.2d 67 ]; 1 Witkin, California Procedure, § 123, p. 387; § 148(b), p. 412.)

People v. Cuadra

California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 2021

Silveria and Travis (2020) 10 Cal.5th 195, 232; accord, People v. Brown (2015) 61 Cal.4th 968, 975 (Brown).) Officers must have sufficient justification under the Fourth Amendment to effect a search and seizure. … (Brown, supra, 61 Cal.4th at p. 974, citing Florida v. Bostick (1991) 501 U.S. 429, 434.)

Masonite Corp. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

65 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1976

Masonite also kept records of the board-foot production of the plant on a daily basis. The gas bills of P G and E were excessively high for the months of November and December 1971. … Silvertrust (1971) 6 Cal.3d 94, 100 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 293 , 490 P.2d 805 ]; Brown v. Superior Court (1949) 34 Cal.2d 559, 564-565 [ 212 P.2d 878 ]; Harrison v.

People v. Linyard

151 Cal. App. 2d 50 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1957

One of the men was wearing a brown sport coat and a brown hat, and was seen heating a spoon over some matches. This officer and his associate left their observation spot and proceeded immediately next door to room 11. … (People v. Cobb, 45 Cal.2d 158 [ 287 P.2d 752 ]; People v. David, 12 Cal.2d 639 [ 86 P.2d 811 ] ; People v. Romer, 218 Cal. 449 [ 23 P.2d 749 ]; People v. Arnold, 116 Cal. 682 [ 48 P. 803 ] ; People v.

Gallagher v. J. W. Wright & Sons Investment Co.

86 Cal. App. 553 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 1927

Watson, supra, quoting from Chase v. … Appellant also refers to Flinn v.