Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

2.35s

  • Gordon H. Ball, Inc. v. State ex rel. Department of Public Works

    26 Cal. App. 3d 162 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1972

    (DiGenova v. State Board of Education, supra, 51 Cal.2d at p. 174.) … California Highway Com. v. Riley, 192 Cal. 97, 108 (1923); Conlin v. Board of Supervisors, 99 Cal. 17, 21-22 (1893).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lane v. Superior Court

    98 Cal. App. 2d 165 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1950

    A good discussion on the subject is found in Morgan v. State Board of Equalisation, 89 Cal.App.2d 674, 677 [ 201 P.2d 859 ]. … In Bastajian v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

    58 Cal. App. 4th 647 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1997

    (Kobe v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1950) 35 Cal.2d 33 , 35 . . . .)” (State Lottery Com. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 311, 315 [ 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 745 ].) … Disposition The decision of the board is annulled. The case is remanded to the board with directions to enter a new order denying the claim. Vogel (Miriam A.), J., and Masterson, J., concurred.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Vanvalkenburgh

    145 Cal. App. 3d 163 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 1983

    Relying on People v. … We hold, therefore, that under People v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Arroyo v. Pacific Ridge Neighborhood Homeowners Assn.

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 2025

    (Fourth La Costa Condominium Owners Assn. v. Seith (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 563, 571; Asaro v. … (Friars Village Homeowners Assn. v. Hansing (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 405, 411-412; see also Lake Lindero Homeowners Association, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.

    38 Cal. App. 2d 674 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1940

    To enforce an ordinance, a legislative body,—in this case the board of supervisors,—may delegate to the board or commission the right to determine a state of facts upon which an ordinance shall operate. … An instruction covering the same subject in a modified form, taken from the language in Brown v. Yocum, 113 Cal. App. 621 [ 298 Pac. 845 ], was given.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • DiBona v. Matthews

    220 Cal. App. 3d 1329 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1990

    Similar issues were similarly resolved in Brown v. Board of Regents of University of Nebraska (D.Neb. 1986) 640 F.Supp. 674 . … (See Board of Education v. Pico (1982) 457 U.S. 853, 883 [ 73 L.Ed.2d 435, 457 , 102 S.Ct. 2799 ] (conc. opn. of White, J.).) In Hazelwood School District v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Reid v. Boyle

    43 Cal. App. 34 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 1919

    In this proceeding, as was the case in Miller v. … One hundred and eighty dollars is the correct amount of the installment of the fee *37 due under the terms of his employment, which, as in the case of Miller v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Wallace

    14 Cal. App. 4th 651 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1993

    Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 533 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], quoting People v. Shirley, supra, 31 Cal.3d at p. 56 .) … (Brown, supra, at p. 533 .) 2 In People v.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Blue Ridge Insurance Co. v. Superior Court

    202 Cal. App. 3d 339 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1988

    (Ibid., italics added.) 7 Brown v. … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 180 Cal.App.3d at p. 705 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Olson v. Federal Insurance

    219 Cal. App. 3d 252 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1990

    In Mann v. … (Gribal *263 do, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A.G. (1970) 3 Cal.3d 434, 447 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 6 , 476 P.2d 406 ].) In Phoenix Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Unkow

    38 Cal. App. 4th 1490 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1995

    There was no evidence they were present at the July 8,1993, board meeting or otherwise witnessed or heard of any hostility between Evans and Scherzer. (Cf. Fisher v. … (Morcos v. Board of Retirement (1990) 51 Cal.3d 924, 927-929 [ 275 Cal.Rptr. 187 , 800 P.2d 543 ]; Grade-Way Construction Co. v. Golden Eagle Ins. Co. (1993) 13 *1500 Cal.App.4th 826, 837-838 [ 16 Cal.Rptr.2d 649 ].)

    Cited 123 timesPublished
  • Western Growers Assn. v. Occupational Safety & Health Stds. Bd.

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 2022

    (Western Oil & Gas Assn. v. Air Resources Board (1984) 37 Cal.3d 502, 509.) … Brown (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 1264, 1275.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Hawkins

    273 Cal. App. 2d 529 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1969

    Both the open box containing the brown paper bag of marijuana and the brown paper bag itself, which were involved in Marshall , were as movable as the jacket which we have here. … Finally, under Cooper and Preston v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Oxnard School District

    270 Cal. App. 2d 587 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 11, 1969

    (Matteson v. Board of Education, 104 Cal.App. 647, 655 [ 286 P. 482 ].) … (Board of Education v. Wilkinson, 125 Cal.App.2d 100 [ 270 P.2d 82 ]; Matteson v. Board of Education, 104 Cal.App. 647 [ 286 P. 482 ].)

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Green v. City of Los Angeles

    40 Cal. App. 3d 819 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 1974

    “The maritime law was thought to reach ‘[e]ver'y species of tort, however occurring, and whether on board a vessel or not, if upon the high seas or navigable waters . . . .’ Atlantic Transport Co. v. … Indermill, 182 Cal.App.2d 339 [ 6 Cal.Rptr. 469 ]; Pittman v. Boiven, 249 Cal.App.2d 207 [ 57 Cal.Rptr. 319 ]; Brown v. World Church, 272 Cal.App.2d 684 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 669 , 45 A.L.R.3d 622 ]; Williams v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Jelincic v. Cal. Public Employees Retirement System etc. CA1/1

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 2023

    Brown Act (§ 54950 et seq.; Brown Act). 12 concede its conduct constituted a violation]; Shapiro v. … (Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • DiQuisto v. County of Santa Clara

    181 Cal. App. 4th 236 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 2010

    (Brown v. Boren (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1316 *258 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 758 ].) … (Oliver v. Board of Trustees (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 824, 832 [ 227 Cal.Rptr. 1 ].) Nevertheless, the County’s brief cites “considerable evidence supporting the order”—a circumstance that eases our task on appeal.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • California School Employees Ass'n v. Willits Unified School District

    243 Cal. App. 2d 776 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 1966

    But in Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. … The case cited by the district, Noroian v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Ontario Mountain Village Assn. v. City of Ontario CA4/2

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 2014

    decision based on a Brown Act violation]; Galbiso v. … City of Long Beach (1950) 35 Cal.2d 155 [civil service board hearing regarding police officer dismissal]; Volstedt v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.