Case law

People v. Dias

52 Cal. App. 4th 46 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1997

In People v. Brown (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1251 [ 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 76 ], the defendant entered the victim’s home, held a gun to her head, and threatened to kill her if she called the police. … (People v. Brown, supra, 20 Cal.App.4th at p. 1254, 1256 .) However, thus far Dias has at least three appellate opinions against him. In People v.

Kumar v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc.

218 Cal. App. 3d 1050 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1990

(See Eureka Teachers Ass’n. v. Board of Education (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 353, 369 [ 244 Cal.Rptr. 240 ]; Carey v. Board of Medical Examiners (1977) 66 Cal.App.3d 538, 540 [ 136 Cal.Rptr. 91 ].) In English v. … (English v. City of Long Beach, supra, 35 Cal.2d at p. 160 .) The same reasoning applies here. Until an unbiased governing board has again considered the merits of Dr.

Tax Factors, Inc. v. County of Marin

20 Cal. App. 2d 79 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1937

He is not entitled to financial aid through the board of supervisors (Dougherty v. Austin, 94 Cal. 601 [ 28 Pac. 834 , 29 Pac. 1092 , 16 L. … Haley & Co. v. McVay, supra.

J. & W. C. Shull, Inc. v. Merced Irrigation District

90 Cal. App. 270 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1928

here and there upon small lots, which are thereby rendered unfit for cultivation at the same time that their value for other purposes may have been greatly enhanced.’ ” In the leading case of Board of Directors v. … Likewise, in the case of Los Angeles County Flood Control District v.

In Re McDonald

45 Cal. App. 480 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1920

board. … (See Forni v. Yoell, 99 Cal. 173 , [ 33 Pac. 887 ], and cases therein cited; also, Peterson v. Superior Court, 30 Cal. App. 466 , [ 158 Pac. 547 ].)

In Re Marriage of Borges

83 Cal. App. 3d 771 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1978

BORGES, Respondent, v. JACQUELINE ROBINSON, as Special Administratrix, etc., Appellant. Docket No. 41464. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four. … Nelson contends, citing Waite v. Waite (1972) 6 Cal.3d 461 [ 99 Cal. Rptr. 325 , 492 P.2d 13 ] (disapproved on other grounds, In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d at p. 851) and Bensing v. Bensing (1972) 25 Cal.

McQuilkin v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.

27 Cal. App. 698 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1915

Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 52 W. Va. 410 , [ 44 S. … Co. v. Adams Machine Co., 92 Miss. 849 , [ 47 South. 412 ]; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hall, 124 U. S. 444 , [ 31 L. Ed. 479 , 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 577].

Gordon H. Ball, Inc. v. State ex rel. Department of Public Works

26 Cal. App. 3d 162 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1972

(DiGenova v. State Board of Education, supra, 51 Cal.2d at p. 174.) … California Highway Com. v. Riley, 192 Cal. 97, 108 (1923); Conlin v. Board of Supervisors, 99 Cal. 17, 21-22 (1893).

Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

58 Cal. App. 4th 647 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1997

(Kobe v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1950) 35 Cal.2d 33 , 35 . . . .)” (State Lottery Com. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 311, 315 [ 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 745 ].) … Disposition The decision of the board is annulled. The case is remanded to the board with directions to enter a new order denying the claim. Vogel (Miriam A.), J., and Masterson, J., concurred.

People v. Vanvalkenburgh

145 Cal. App. 3d 163 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 1983

Relying on People v. … We hold, therefore, that under People v.

People v. Blis

3 Cal. App. 162 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1906

In Brown v. … The case of Brown v.

Masonite Corp. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

65 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1976

Masonite also kept records of the board-foot production of the plant on a daily basis. The gas bills of P G and E were excessively high for the months of November and December 1971. … Silvertrust (1971) 6 Cal.3d 94, 100 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 293 , 490 P.2d 805 ]; Brown v. Superior Court (1949) 34 Cal.2d 559, 564-565 [ 212 P.2d 878 ]; Harrison v.

People v. Henderson

144 Cal. App. 2d 706 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1956

boards. … (People v. Sica, 112 Cal.App.2d 574, 581 [ 247 P.2d 72 ] ; People v. Adams, 137 Cal.App.2d 660, 669 [ 290 P.2d 944 ]; People v. Henry, 86 Cal.App.2d 785 [ 195 P.2d 478 ]; People v.

Anderson v. State

61 Cal. App. 2d 140 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1943

(See, Rose v. State of California, 19 Cal.2d 713 [ 123 P.2d 505 ] ; Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 P. 82 ]; McCandless v. City of Los Angeles, 214 Cal. 67 [ 4 P.2d 139 ] ; Eachus v. … Com., 219 Cal. 699 [ 28 P.2d 919 ]; Gibson Properties Co. v. City of Oakland, 12 Cal.2d 291 [ 83 P.2d 942 ]; Gates v. McKinnon, 18 Cal.2d 179 [ 114 P.2d 576 ]; Neel v.

Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.

38 Cal. App. 2d 674 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1940

To enforce an ordinance, a legislative body,—in this case the board of supervisors,—may delegate to the board or commission the right to determine a state of facts upon which an ordinance shall operate. … An instruction covering the same subject in a modified form, taken from the language in Brown v. Yocum, 113 Cal. App. 621 [ 298 Pac. 845 ], was given.

DiBona v. Matthews

220 Cal. App. 3d 1329 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1990

Similar issues were similarly resolved in Brown v. Board of Regents of University of Nebraska (D.Neb. 1986) 640 F.Supp. 674 . … (See Board of Education v. Pico (1982) 457 U.S. 853, 883 [ 73 L.Ed.2d 435, 457 , 102 S.Ct. 2799 ] (conc. opn. of White, J.).) In Hazelwood School District v.

Barnhart v. Cabrillo Community College

90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 709 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 1999

board.’ … Union v. Board of Trustees, supra, 47 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1665-1666.)

Reid v. Boyle

43 Cal. App. 34 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 1919

In this proceeding, as was the case in Miller v. … One hundred and eighty dollars is the correct amount of the installment of the fee *37 due under the terms of his employment, which, as in the case of Miller v.

Evans v. Unkow

38 Cal. App. 4th 1490 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1995

There was no evidence they were present at the July 8,1993, board meeting or otherwise witnessed or heard of any hostility between Evans and Scherzer. (Cf. Fisher v. … (Morcos v. Board of Retirement (1990) 51 Cal.3d 924, 927-929 [ 275 Cal.Rptr. 187 , 800 P.2d 543 ]; Grade-Way Construction Co. v. Golden Eagle Ins. Co. (1993) 13 *1500 Cal.App.4th 826, 837-838 [ 16 Cal.Rptr.2d 649 ].)

Shepherd v. Jones

136 Cal. App. 3d 1049 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1982

(Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at p. 577 [ 33 L.Ed.2d at p. 561 ].) … Appellant relies on the language in Board of Regents v.