Case law

Stewart v. Eaves

84 Cal. App. 312 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1927

In the case of San Diego v. … The law in other states with respect to this subject matter is clearly defined in Farley v. Board of Education, City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 [ 162 Pac. 797 ].

Hora v. City & County of San Francisco

233 Cal. App. 2d 375 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1965

(Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 259, 265 [ 341 P.2d 291 ].) … (Sica v. Board of Police Comrs., supra, 200 Cal.App.2d 137 .)

Rousselot v. Spanier

60 Cal. App. 3d 238 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1976

Our decision here is supported by the decision of the Supreme Court in Brown v. Terra Bella Irrigation Dist. (1958) 51 Cal.2d 33 [ 330 P.2d 775 ]. … (Gray, The Rule Against Perpetuities (4th ed. 1942). § 279, pp. 311-312.) 3 For a further statement of facts see the District Court of Appeal opinion, Brown v.

Malaley v. City of Marysville

37 Cal. App. 638 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1918

(Mansfield v. Chambers, 26 Cal. App. 499, 505 , [ 147 Pac. 595 ].) … Herein reliance is placed upon the language of this court in the case of Law v.

Shean v. Edmonds

89 Cal. App. 2d 315 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1948

(Allied Architects Assn. v. Payne, supra.) “The determination of what constitutes a public purpose is primarily a matter for legislative discretion (Veterans’ Welfare Board v. Riley, supra; Allied Architects Assn. v. … (Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board, 31 Cal.2d 401, 413 [ 189 P.2d 17 ].)

Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.

7 Cal. App. 534 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 6, 1908

In support of his contention respondent cites Young v. Wright, 52 Cal. 410 , Judah v. Fredericks, 57 Cal. 391 , and City of Los Angeles v. Mellus, 59 Cal. 451 . … Bergin, 127 Cal. 578 , [ 60 Pac. 164 ], the allegation, “The board of supervisors duly made and passed a resolution” is approved. In Werth v. Springfield, 78 Mo. 107 , and Stewart v.

California Trial Lawyers Assn. v. Superior Court

187 Cal. App. 3d 575 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1986

Quoting the Arizona Supreme Court in Blende v. … Real parties cite Fry v.

Gould v. Richmond School District

58 Cal. App. 2d 497 · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 1943

In the case of Penland v. … (Monk v. Ehret, 192 Cal. 186 [ 219 P. 452 ] ; Kahn v. Wilson, 120 Cal. 643 [ 53 P. 24 ]; 2 Cal.Jur. 734.)

People v. Mosco

214 Cal. App. 2d 581 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1963

In People v. McClain, 209 Cal. … (People v. West, 144 Cal.App. 2d 214, 219-220 [ 300 P.2d 729 ]; United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559, 563 [ 47 S.Ct. 746 , 71 L.Ed. 1202 ].) In People v. McLaine, 204 Cal.App.2d 96, 101-102 [ 22 Cal.

Potomac Oil Co. v. Dye

14 Cal. App. 674 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1910

(Bay State Gas Co. v. State, 4 Penne. (Del.) 502, [ 56 Atl. 1121 ].) … (Olson v. Board of Commissioners, 8 Kan. App. 414 , [ 54 Pac. 805 ].) The old board of directors who assumed to act and appointed Scott had ceased to be such board upon the election of their successors.

Sherrard v. Lidyoff

108 Cal. App. 2d 325 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1951

(Dorswitt v. Wilson, 51 Cal. App.2d 623 [ 125 P.2d 626 ]; Daulton v. Williams, 81 Cal. App.2d 70 [ 183 P.2d 325 ].) As was said in Dorswitt v. … (Colburn v. Shuravlev, 24 Cal.App.2d 298 [ 74 P.2d 1060 ]; Priver v. Young, 62 Cal.App. 405 [ 216 P. 966 ].) ” So too in Daulton v.

Clark v. Patterson

68 Cal. App. 3d 329 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1977

Uhl v. Collins, 217 Cal. 1 [ 17 P.2d 99 , 85 A.L.R. 1370 ]; Garver v. … (b); Thompson v.

Norman v. Cogswell

82 Cal. App. 159 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1927

In the case of Broyles v. Mahon, 72 Cal. … (Chase v. Treasurer of Los Angeles et al., 122 Cal. 540 [ 55 Pac. 414 ], See, also, Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors, 131 Cal. 364 [ 82 Am. St. Rep. 350 , 63 Pac. 663 ].)

California State Employees Ass'n v. Trustees of California State Colleges

237 Cal. App. 2d 530 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1965

(Smith v. Municipal Court, 167 Cal.App.2d 534, 539 [ 334 P.2d 931 ]; Meyer v. Board of Trustees, 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 431 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].) … (Meyer v. Board of Trustees, supra, 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 431 ; Broadway-Locust Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 92 Cal.App.2d 287, 293 [ 206 P.2d 856 ]; Universal Engineering Co. v.

Hodges v. Kauffman

95 Cal. App. 598 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1928

the members of the board, and who constituted the majority thereof, namely, Carl Blank, Hugh McCaffrey, and Hugh Felix MeNellis, should be recalled (Ratto v. … charged with that duty {Keller v.

City of Santee v. County of San Diego

214 Cal. App. 3d 1438 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1989

(See City of San Diego v. Board of Supervisors (Super. Ct. San Diego County, 1987, No. 589497).) … (Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].)

In Re Tripp

58 Cal. Rptr. 3d 64 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2007

(Biggs v. Terhune [(9th Cir. 2003)] 334 F.3d [910,] 917.) … (Irons v.

In Re Neal

114 Cal. App. 3d 141 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1980

(a), (e) and (f); Way v. … (See People v.

Pierce v. County of Solano

62 Cal. App. 465 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 8, 1923

(Dillingham v. Welch, 179 Cal. 656 [ 178 Pac. 512 ].) … the determination of the board, under such, circumstances, is conclusive.

People v. Dias

52 Cal. App. 4th 46 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1997

In People v. Brown (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1251 [ 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 76 ], the defendant entered the victim’s home, held a gun to her head, and threatened to kill her if she called the police. … (People v. Brown, supra, 20 Cal.App.4th at p. 1254, 1256 .) However, thus far Dias has at least three appellate opinions against him. In People v.