Case law

In Re HD

174 Cal. App. 4th 768 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 2009

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. H.D., Defendant and Appellant. No. H033462. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. … Those functions reside with the Youth Authority Board (now Board of Parole Hearings) created by Senate Bill No. 459 (2003-2004 Reg. Sess.). (Stats. 2003, ch. 4, §§ 16, 20, amending §§ 1719, 1723.)

Dore v. County of Ventura

23 Cal. App. 4th 320 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1994

The board’s findings, which incorporate the factual findings stated in staff reports, satisfy the requirements set forth in Topanga. The case of Guinnane v. … Desert Turf Club v. Board of Supervisors (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 446 [ 296 P.2d 882 ], is also inapposite.

County of Los Angeles v. Hurlbut

44 Cal. App. 2d 88 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 8, 1941

(Mintzer v. Schilling, 117 Cal. 361, 363 [ 49 Pac. 209 ]; Argyle Dredging Co. v. Chambers, 40 Cal. App. 332, 342 [ 181 Pac. 84 ].) … (McDonald v. Conniff, 99 Cal. 386 [ 34 Pac. 71 ]; Cody v.

Fox v. JAMDAT MOBILE, INC.

185 Cal. App. 4th 1068 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 2010

(City of Atascadero v. … Co. v. Superior Court (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 434, 442 [ 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 56 ].) 4 In its ruling on the demurrer, the trial court correctly relied on the opinion of the Court of Chancery of Delaware in Gantler v.

Hutcherson v. Alexander

264 Cal. App. 2d 126 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 17, 1968

(Griffin v. Northridge, 67 Cal.App.2d 69, 76 [ 153 P.2d 800 ] ; McIvor v. Mercer-Fraser Co., 76 Cal.App.2d 247, 254 [ 172 P.2d 758 ]). … Code, § 3283; Keys v. Romley, 64 Cal.2d 396, 411 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 273 , 412 P.2d 529 ]; but compare actions at law: Hopkins *135 v. Western Pac. R.R. Co., 50 Cal. 190 ; Bigley v. Nunan, 53 Cal. 403 ; Ford v.

O'Keefe v. Atascadero County Sanitation District

21 Cal. App. 3d 719 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1971

(Sailors v. Kent Board of Education (1967) 387 U.S. 105 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 650 , 87 S.Ct. 1549 ].) … (Temescal Water Co. v. Dept. Public Works (1955) 44 Cal.2d 90, 107 [ 280 P.2d 1 ]; Hilton v. Board of Supervisors (1970) 7 Cal.App.3d 708, 717 [ 86 Cal.Rptr. 754 ]; Mull v.

People v. Mitchell

152 Cal. App. 3d 433 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1984

In People v. … (People v. Giminez (1975) 14 Cal.3d 68, 72 [ 120 Cal.Rptr. 577 , 534 P.2d 65 ]; People v. Bradford (1976) 17 Cal.3d 8, 20 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 129 , 549 P.2d 1225 ].)

Arthur v. City of Petaluma

27 Cal. App. 782 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1915

(Van Reipen v. Jersey City, 58 N. J. L. 262, [ 33 Atl. 740 ].) … (McCoy v.

County of Contra Costa v. State of California

177 Cal. App. 3d 62 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1986

(Santa Clara County v. Superior Court (1949) 33 Cal.2d 552, 559 [ 203 P.2d 1 ]; Johnston v. Board of Supervisors (1947) 31 Cal.2d 66, 70 [ 187 P.2d 686 ].) And courts cannot compel legislative action. (City Council v. … A proceeding before the board will promote judicial efficiency by unearthing the relevant evidence and providing a record which the court may review. (See Edgren v.

Zumwalt v. Trustees of California State Colleges

33 Cal. App. 3d 665 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 1973

(Bogacki v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 5 Cal.3d 771; see also, Board of Education v. Swan, 41 Cal.2d 546 [ 261 P.2d 261 ].) … Recent decisions of the federal Supreme Court, Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, and Perry v.

Stewart v. Eaves

84 Cal. App. 312 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1927

In the case of San Diego v. … The law in other states with respect to this subject matter is clearly defined in Farley v. Board of Education, City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 [ 162 Pac. 797 ].

People v. Saul S.

167 Cal. App. 3d 1061 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1985

(Brown v. Ohio, supra, 432 U.S. at p. 169, fn. 7 [ 53 L.Ed.2d at p. 196 ].) Also, in Jeffers v. … The exception to the general rule established in Brown v.

Javidzad v. City of Santa Monica

204 Cal. App. 3d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1988

. *527 In Nash v. … The City and the Board appealed that decision, which was reviewed in City of Santa Monica v. Yarmark (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 153 [ 249 Cal.Rptr. 732 ].

Rousselot v. Spanier

60 Cal. App. 3d 238 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1976

Our decision here is supported by the decision of the Supreme Court in Brown v. Terra Bella Irrigation Dist. (1958) 51 Cal.2d 33 [ 330 P.2d 775 ]. … (Gray, The Rule Against Perpetuities (4th ed. 1942). § 279, pp. 311-312.) 3 For a further statement of facts see the District Court of Appeal opinion, Brown v.

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 2024

v. … Brown (Utah 1985) 701 P.2d 1086, 1090, quoting State v. Geurts (1961) 11 Utah 2d 345, 348.)

Bell v. Samaritan Medical Clinic, Inc.

60 Cal. App. 3d 486 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1976

Appeals Bd. v. … The Legislature has decreed that no agreement for either legal or medical services in excess of a reasonable amount as determined by the Board is valid (§ 4906; Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. v.

Saad v. City of Berkeley

24 Cal. App. 4th 1206 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1994

(Desmond v. County of Contra Costa (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 330, 334-335 [ 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 842 ].) The burden is on the petitioner to show there is no substantial evidence whatsoever to support the findings of the board. … (Blue Jeans Equities West v.

City of San Jose v. State of California

45 Cal. App. 4th 1802 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1996

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ], quoting Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. … Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 180 ; see also California Teacher’s Association v.

People v. Mosco

214 Cal. App. 2d 581 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1963

In People v. McClain, 209 Cal. … (People v. West, 144 Cal.App. 2d 214, 219-220 [ 300 P.2d 729 ]; United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559, 563 [ 47 S.Ct. 746 , 71 L.Ed. 1202 ].) In People v. McLaine, 204 Cal.App.2d 96, 101-102 [ 22 Cal.

Potomac Oil Co. v. Dye

14 Cal. App. 674 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1910

(Bay State Gas Co. v. State, 4 Penne. (Del.) 502, [ 56 Atl. 1121 ].) … (Olson v. Board of Commissioners, 8 Kan. App. 414 , [ 54 Pac. 805 ].) The old board of directors who assumed to act and appointed Scott had ceased to be such board upon the election of their successors.