Case law

Miller v. Superior Court

50 Cal. App. 4th 1665 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 1996

Motor Corp. v. … Exchange v.

Potomac Oil Co. v. Dye

14 Cal. App. 674 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1910

(Bay State Gas Co. v. State, 4 Penne. (Del.) 502, [ 56 Atl. 1121 ].) … (Olson v. Board of Commissioners, 8 Kan. App. 414 , [ 54 Pac. 805 ].) The old board of directors who assumed to act and appointed Scott had ceased to be such board upon the election of their successors.

People v. Williams

184 Cal. App. 4th 142 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 2010

Co. v. Chiu (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 438, 445 [ 96 Cal.Rptr.3d 54 ].) That is not true here. VOE is not a tax board authorized to charge for penalties and interest for nonpayment of payroll taxes. … However, it appears the State Board of Equalization did not present any such evidence to justify the claim for penalties and interest in People v. Boudames, supra, 146 Cal.App.4th 45 .

Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.

38 Cal. App. 2d 674 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1940

To enforce an ordinance, a legislative body,—in this case the board of supervisors,—may delegate to the board or commission the right to determine a state of facts upon which an ordinance shall operate. … An instruction covering the same subject in a modified form, taken from the language in Brown v. Yocum, 113 Cal. App. 621 [ 298 Pac. 845 ], was given.

California State Employees Ass'n v. Trustees of California State Colleges

237 Cal. App. 2d 530 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1965

(Smith v. Municipal Court, 167 Cal.App.2d 534, 539 [ 334 P.2d 931 ]; Meyer v. Board of Trustees, 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 431 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].) … (Meyer v. Board of Trustees, supra, 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 431 ; Broadway-Locust Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 92 Cal.App.2d 287, 293 [ 206 P.2d 856 ]; Universal Engineering Co. v.

Hobe v. Madera Irrigation District

128 Cal. App. 2d 9 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1954

“(b) The board deems the exclusion to be for the best interest of the district. ...” *12 In the case of J. & W. C. Shull, Inc. v. Merced Irr. … In IngUn v.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hartle

59 Cal. App. 3d 852 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1976

Co. v. … Brown (1967) 252 Cal.App.2d 120, 122 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 1 ]; Hale v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (1967) 256 Cal.App.2d 177, 180-181 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 819 ]; Paul Masson Co. v. Colonial Ins.

McLaughlin v. Superior Court

29 Cal. App. 3d 35 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1972

We conclude, therefore, that it was both confusing and misleading to include in the board’s letter to petitioner a warning which only pertains to action taken upon a claim. 10 *40 In Viles v. … (Cruise v. City & County of San Francisco (1951) 101 Cal.App.2d 558, 564-565 [ 225 P.2d 988 ]; Mendibles v. City of San Diego (1950) 100 Cal.App.2d 502, 506 [ 224 P.2d 42 ]; Fredrichsen v.

Schecter v. County of Los Angeles

258 Cal. App. 2d 391 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1968

An administrative board cannot legally confer upon its employees authority that under the law may be exercised only by the board. (House v. Los Angeles County, 104 Cal. 73, 79 [ 37 P. 796 ]; Holley v. … County and Board rely heavily on the case of Johnston v. Board of Supervisors, 31 Cal.2d 66, 72 [ 187 P.2d 686 ], to bolster their position.

Rivero v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE

130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 81 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 2003

In Ludwig v. … In Bowling v.

Maurer v. Weatherby

1 Cal. App. 243 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1905

Boards of equalization cannot increase an assessment unless they have evidence before them justifying such increase. (Oakland v. Southern Pac. Co., 131 Cal. 230 , [ 63 Pac. 371 ].) … (Lewis v. Colgan, 115 Cal. 529 , [ 47 Pac. 357 ]; Kansas Pacific Ry. Co. v. Riley County Commrs., 20 Kan. 141 ; City of Grand Rapids v. Welleman, 85 Mich, 234 , [ 48 N. W. 534 ] ; Bardrick v.

Martino v. Concord Community Hospital District

233 Cal. App. 2d 51 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1965

(Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal (1941) 17 Cal.2d 280 [ 109 P.2d 942 , 132 A.L.R. 715 ]; Alexander v. State Personnel Board (1943) 22 Cal.2d 198 [ 137 P.2d 433 ].) … In Wyatt v.

Luxor Cab Co. v. Cahill

21 Cal. App. 3d 551 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1971

Board and must be sustained if supported by substantial evidence (Greif v. … State Personnel Board, 136 Cal.App.2d 904, 909 [ 289 P.2d 863 ]; Wisler v. Cal.

Crum v. City of Los Angeles

110 Cal. App. 508 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1930

board. … In support of this contention the defendants cite Goetz v. Goldbaum, 4 Cal. Unrep. 749 [ 37 Pac. 646 ] , Resetar v. Leonardi, 61 Cal. App. 765 [ 216 Pac. 71 ], Cross v. Bouck, 175 Cal. 253 [ 165 Pac. 702 ], McDougald v.

Ruggiero v. Los Angeles City Unified School District

33 Cal. App. 3d 970 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 16, 1973

(Heckley v. Board of Education (1959) 53 Cal.2d 218, 220-221 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 4 , 347 P.2d 4 ]; Frates v. Burnett (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 63, 69 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 731 ]; Board of Education v. … (Fry v. Board of Education (1941) 17 Cal.2d 753, 760 [ 112 P.2d 229 ].)

Kirk v. County of San Luis Obispo

156 Cal. App. 3d 453 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1984

(Bright v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 66 Cal.App.3d 191, 193-194 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 758 ].) … (Resource Defense Fund v. County of Santa Cruz, (1982) 133 *460 Cal.App.3d 800 [ 184 Cal.Rptr. 371 ]; Great Western Sav. & Loan Assn. v. City of Los Angeles (1973) 31 Cal.App.3d 403 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 359 ]; Drummey v.

Warga v. Cooper

44 Cal. App. 4th 371 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1996

(See Gates v. Superior Court (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 301 , 308 . . . ; Ellena v. State of California (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 245 , 253 . . . ; Avery v. Avery (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 525 , 529 . . . ; United States Fire Ins. … Co. v. Johansen (1969) 270 Cal.App.2d 824 , 833 . . . ; Guaranty L. Corp. v. Board of Supers. (1937) 22 Cal.App.2d 684 , 686 . . . ; 7 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Judgment, § 219, p. 656, and cases cited.)”

New Plumbing Contractors v. Edwards, Sooy & Byron

121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 472 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 2002

(Western Polymer Technology, Inc. v. Reliance Ins. Co. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 14, 24 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 78 ].) … Co. v. Ridout Roofing Co. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 495, 504-505 [ 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 286 ].)

Masters v. San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Ass'n

32 Cal. App. 4th 30 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1995

(See Tielsch v. … In Johnson v.

Anderson v. Calaveras Central Mining Corp.

13 Cal. App. 2d 338 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1936

(Bogart v. George K. Porter Co., supra; Daniels v. Johnson, 129 Cal. 415 [ 61 Pac. 1107 , 79 Am. St. Rep. 123 ] ; Sherwood & Sherwood v. Gill & Lutz, 36 Cal. App. 707 [ 173 Pac. 171]; Davis v. Davis, 19 Cal. … (Bailey v. Hoffman, 99 Cal. App. 347 [ 278 Pac. 498 ]; Egan v. Bishop, 8 Cal. App. (2d) 119 [ 47 Pac. (2d) 500 ]; Shanklin v. Scribner, 62 Cal. App. 487 [ 217 Pac. 130 ].)