Case law

Scott B. v. Bd. of Trustees Orange Co. High School

217 Cal. App. 4th 117 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 2013

(American Board of Cosmetic Surgery v. Medical Board of California (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 534, 547.) … In doing so, we review de novo the court‟s application of the law to the undisputed facts, while paying deference to the Board‟s decision to dismiss Scott from school. (Granowitz v.

Dore v. County of Ventura

23 Cal. App. 4th 320 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1994

The board’s findings, which incorporate the factual findings stated in staff reports, satisfy the requirements set forth in Topanga. The case of Guinnane v. … Desert Turf Club v. Board of Supervisors (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 446 [ 296 P.2d 882 ], is also inapposite.

Fox v. JAMDAT MOBILE, INC.

185 Cal. App. 4th 1068 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 2010

(City of Atascadero v. … Co. v. Superior Court (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 434, 442 [ 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 56 ].) 4 In its ruling on the demurrer, the trial court correctly relied on the opinion of the Court of Chancery of Delaware in Gantler v.

Hutcherson v. Alexander

264 Cal. App. 2d 126 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 17, 1968

(Griffin v. Northridge, 67 Cal.App.2d 69, 76 [ 153 P.2d 800 ] ; McIvor v. Mercer-Fraser Co., 76 Cal.App.2d 247, 254 [ 172 P.2d 758 ]). … Code, § 3283; Keys v. Romley, 64 Cal.2d 396, 411 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 273 , 412 P.2d 529 ]; but compare actions at law: Hopkins *135 v. Western Pac. R.R. Co., 50 Cal. 190 ; Bigley v. Nunan, 53 Cal. 403 ; Ford v.

O'Keefe v. Atascadero County Sanitation District

21 Cal. App. 3d 719 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1971

(Sailors v. Kent Board of Education (1967) 387 U.S. 105 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 650 , 87 S.Ct. 1549 ].) … (Temescal Water Co. v. Dept. Public Works (1955) 44 Cal.2d 90, 107 [ 280 P.2d 1 ]; Hilton v. Board of Supervisors (1970) 7 Cal.App.3d 708, 717 [ 86 Cal.Rptr. 754 ]; Mull v.

People v. Mitchell

152 Cal. App. 3d 433 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1984

In People v. … (People v. Giminez (1975) 14 Cal.3d 68, 72 [ 120 Cal.Rptr. 577 , 534 P.2d 65 ]; People v. Bradford (1976) 17 Cal.3d 8, 20 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 129 , 549 P.2d 1225 ].)

Arthur v. City of Petaluma

27 Cal. App. 782 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1915

(Van Reipen v. Jersey City, 58 N. J. L. 262, [ 33 Atl. 740 ].) … (McCoy v.

County of Contra Costa v. State of California

177 Cal. App. 3d 62 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1986

(Santa Clara County v. Superior Court (1949) 33 Cal.2d 552, 559 [ 203 P.2d 1 ]; Johnston v. Board of Supervisors (1947) 31 Cal.2d 66, 70 [ 187 P.2d 686 ].) And courts cannot compel legislative action. (City Council v. … A proceeding before the board will promote judicial efficiency by unearthing the relevant evidence and providing a record which the court may review. (See Edgren v.

Stewart v. Eaves

84 Cal. App. 312 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1927

In the case of San Diego v. … The law in other states with respect to this subject matter is clearly defined in Farley v. Board of Education, City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 [ 162 Pac. 797 ].

People v. Saul S.

167 Cal. App. 3d 1061 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1985

(Brown v. Ohio, supra, 432 U.S. at p. 169, fn. 7 [ 53 L.Ed.2d at p. 196 ].) Also, in Jeffers v. … The exception to the general rule established in Brown v.

Javidzad v. City of Santa Monica

204 Cal. App. 3d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1988

. *527 In Nash v. … The City and the Board appealed that decision, which was reviewed in City of Santa Monica v. Yarmark (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 153 [ 249 Cal.Rptr. 732 ].

Rousselot v. Spanier

60 Cal. App. 3d 238 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1976

Our decision here is supported by the decision of the Supreme Court in Brown v. Terra Bella Irrigation Dist. (1958) 51 Cal.2d 33 [ 330 P.2d 775 ]. … (Gray, The Rule Against Perpetuities (4th ed. 1942). § 279, pp. 311-312.) 3 For a further statement of facts see the District Court of Appeal opinion, Brown v.

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 2024

v. … Brown (Utah 1985) 701 P.2d 1086, 1090, quoting State v. Geurts (1961) 11 Utah 2d 345, 348.)

Bell v. Samaritan Medical Clinic, Inc.

60 Cal. App. 3d 486 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1976

Appeals Bd. v. … The Legislature has decreed that no agreement for either legal or medical services in excess of a reasonable amount as determined by the Board is valid (§ 4906; Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. v.

Migliore v. Mid-Century Insurance

118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 2002

Dennis Brown of the Catastrophe Center was appointed by respondent to evaluate the claim. … This dollar amount is based upon the estimate completed by your adjuster, Dennis Brown.

Saad v. City of Berkeley

24 Cal. App. 4th 1206 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1994

(Desmond v. County of Contra Costa (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 330, 334-335 [ 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 842 ].) The burden is on the petitioner to show there is no substantial evidence whatsoever to support the findings of the board. … (Blue Jeans Equities West v.

City of San Jose v. State of California

45 Cal. App. 4th 1802 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1996

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ], quoting Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. … Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 180 ; see also California Teacher’s Association v.

Potomac Oil Co. v. Dye

14 Cal. App. 674 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1910

(Bay State Gas Co. v. State, 4 Penne. (Del.) 502, [ 56 Atl. 1121 ].) … (Olson v. Board of Commissioners, 8 Kan. App. 414 , [ 54 Pac. 805 ].) The old board of directors who assumed to act and appointed Scott had ceased to be such board upon the election of their successors.

Sherrard v. Lidyoff

108 Cal. App. 2d 325 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1951

(Dorswitt v. Wilson, 51 Cal. App.2d 623 [ 125 P.2d 626 ]; Daulton v. Williams, 81 Cal. App.2d 70 [ 183 P.2d 325 ].) As was said in Dorswitt v. … (Colburn v. Shuravlev, 24 Cal.App.2d 298 [ 74 P.2d 1060 ]; Priver v. Young, 62 Cal.App. 405 [ 216 P. 966 ].) ” So too in Daulton v.

California State Employees Ass'n v. Trustees of California State Colleges

237 Cal. App. 2d 530 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1965

(Smith v. Municipal Court, 167 Cal.App.2d 534, 539 [ 334 P.2d 931 ]; Meyer v. Board of Trustees, 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 431 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].) … (Meyer v. Board of Trustees, supra, 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 431 ; Broadway-Locust Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 92 Cal.App.2d 287, 293 [ 206 P.2d 856 ]; Universal Engineering Co. v.