Case law

Washington v. State Personnel Board

127 Cal. App. 3d 636 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1981

In this examination we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the board’s findings and indulge all reasonable inferences in support thereof. (Neely v. … (Skelly v. State Personnel Bd (1975) 15 Cal.3d 194, 218 [ 124 Cal.Rptr. 14 , 539 P.2d 774 ].) After a full evidentiary hearing, the dismissal was upheld by the board.

People Ex Rel. Brown v. Powerex Corp.

62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 638 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 11, 2007

Cal. v. … [v.

Long v. State Personnel Board

41 Cal. App. 3d 1000 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1974

('Sail’er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby, supra, pp. 16-17.) On the other hand, we are reviewing here-a classification created by the State Personnel Board, a constitutional agency of the State of California. In Pereyda v. … All reasonable inferences must be drawn in support of the findings of the Board (Hingsbergen v. State Personnel Bd. (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 914 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 59 ]; Neely v.

Comstock v. Board of Trustees

35 Cal. App. 2d 466 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1939

(Comstock v. Board of Trustees, 20 Cal. … App. (2d) 115 [ 36 Pac. (2d) 153 ] ; Caminetti v. Board of Trustees, 1 Cal. (2d) 354 [ 34 Pac. (2d) 1021 ] ; Abraham, v. Sims, 2 Cal. (2d) 698 [ 42 Pac. (2d) 1029 ].)

Austin v. Board of Retirement

209 Cal. App. 3d 1528 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1989

Finally, the Board contends Tripp does not apply, as the Board was prevented by law from awarding benefits until the administrative appeal process was completed. Interestingly, in Mass v. … (Tripp v.

Howe v. Board of Supervisors

118 Cal. App. 306 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1931

The decision in Gibson v. Board of Supervisors, 80 Cal. 359 [ 22 Pac. 225 ], is relied upon as establishing the above stated principle. … In Roche v. Superior Court, 30 Cal.

Cansdale v. Board of Administration

59 Cal. App. 3d 656 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1976

The Board is empowered to resolve conflicts in the evidence and to make its own credibility determination. (Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 33 Cal.2d 89, 93-94 [ 199 P.2d 302 ]; McAllister v. … (Mathews v.

Broyles v. State Personnel Board

42 Cal. App. 2d 303 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 1941

It appears that the board did in fact investigate the performance reports of petitioners and, as provided in the act, the decision of the board is final. … (Stephenson v. Unemployment R. Com., 34 Cal. App. (2d) 19 [ 92 Pac. (2d) 931 ]; Neuwald v. Brock, 12 Cal. (2d) 662 [ 86 Pac. (2d) 1047 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Moore, P. J;, and McComb, J., concurred.

SHIMMON v. Franchise Tax Board

189 Cal. App. 4th 688 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 2010

The FTB denied the claim, and, after an unsuccessful appeal to the state Board of Equalization (BOE), the Dus filed suit. … (Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081 [ 6 Cal.Rptr.3d 457 , 79 P.3d 569 ].)

Crawford v. Board of Education

200 Cal. App. 3d 1397 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 1988

(See Bustop, Inc. v. Los Angeles Board of Education (1978) 439 U.S. 1380 [ 58 L.Ed.2d 88 , 99 S.Ct. 40 ].) Plan II commenced operation as scheduled in September 1978. … Hewitt v. Helms (1987) 482 U.S. 755 [ 96 L.Ed.2d 654 , 107 S.Ct. 2672 ]; American Constitutional Party v.

Thornton v. Board of Trustees

262 Cal. App. 2d 761 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 5, 1968

Proc., § 1085; Titus v. Lawndale School Dist., 157 Cal.App.2d 822, 830 [ 322 P.2d 56 ].) Respondent contends this right is limited to permanent teachers, that is, those enjoying tenure contract rights. … (See Horner v. Board of Trustees, 61 Cal.2d 79 [ 237 Cal.Rptr. 185 , 389 P.2d 713 ].)

Hayes v. Board of Trustees

6 Cal. App. 520 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1907

(Mooney v. Supervisors, 2 Cal. App. 69 , [83 Pac. 165]; People v. Loyalton, 147 Cal. 774 , [ 82 Pac. 620 ] ; People v. Los Angeles, 133 Cal. 338 , [ 65 Pac. 749 ].) … (Town of Santa Monica v. Eckert (Cal.), [ 33 Pac. 880 ].) It is also urged by respondents that the petitioner is not a person or party beneficially interested in the matter.

Summerford v. Board of Retirement

72 Cal. App. 3d 128 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1977

(French v. Rishell (1953) 40 Cal.2d 477, 479 [ 254 P.2d 26 ]; Bernhard v. Bank of America (1942) 19 Cal.2d 807, 813 [ 122 P.2d 892 ]; Barber v. Retirement Board (1971) 18 *131 Cal.App.3d 273, 278 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 657 ].) … Board of Retirement (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 124, 129 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 891 ]; Grant v. Board of Retirement (1967) 253 Cal.App.2d 1020, 1021 [ 61 Cal.Rptr. 791 ]; Flaherty v.

Ogden v. Board of Trustees

74 Cal. App. 159 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1925

Evans as members of said Board of Trustees. … App. 309 [ 119 Pac. 674 ]; Wood v. Board of Fire Commissioners, 50 Cal. App. 593 [ 195 Pac. 739 ].)

Cobler v. Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & Associates

217 Cal. App. 3d 518 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1990

In Gonzales v. … (Ginns v.

Kristal v. State Personnel Board

50 Cal. App. 3d 230 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 1975

Employee’s attack upon the penalty imposed by Board, coming as it does for the first time in Employee’s closing brief, need not be considered in this appeal. (Radinsky v. T. W. … (See e.g., Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337 [ 23 L.Ed.2d 349 , 89 S.Ct. 1820 ], prejudgment garnishment of wages; Goldberg v.

Evard v. Board of Education

64 Cal. App. 2d 745 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1944

The question is answered in the eases of McKee v. Edgar, 137 Cal.App. 462 [ 30 P.2d 999 ], and Brightman v. … (McKee v. Edgar, supra; Brightman v. Board of Education, supra.)

Myers v. Board of Equalization

240 Cal. App. 4th 722 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 2015

BS143436) v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS’ SERVICE et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. … Co. v.

Ng v. State Personnel Board

68 Cal. App. 3d 600 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1977

Relying upon Walker v. … In Skelly v.

Willson v. State Personnel Board

113 Cal. App. 3d 312 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1980

Plaintiff appealed to defendant State Personnel Board (Board). … In Dixon v.