Case law

Borsuk v. Appellate Division of Superior Court

242 Cal. App. 4th 607 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 2015

[Citations.]”]; Weil & Brown, Cal. … (a)(1); see Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v.

People v. McElwee

27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 448 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 2005

(People v. Soriano (1987) 194 Cal.App.3d 1470, 1474 [ 240 Cal.Rptr. 328 ].) “ ‘The writ lies to correct only errors of fact as distinguished from errors of law. [Citation.]’ [Citation.]” (People v. … While appellant suggests a waiver from appellant similar to that discussed in People v.

In Re Dannenberg

125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 458 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 2003

Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 573 , 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 139 , 888 P.2d 1268 ; National Parks & Conservation Assn. v. … Shamblin v.

Hooper v. Wickes

88 Cal. App. 535 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1928

The trial in the Alexander case proceeded upon the theory that the decision of the board of trustees upon the charges preferred was final and conclusive. The substance of the holding in the case of Alexander v. … This is further illustrated in the case of Goldsmith v. Board of Education, 66 Cal.

Luxor Cab Co. v. Cahill

21 Cal. App. 3d 551 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1971

Board and must be sustained if supported by substantial evidence (Greif v. … State Personnel Board, 136 Cal.App.2d 904, 909 [ 289 P.2d 863 ]; Wisler v. Cal.

City of Santee v. County of San Diego

214 Cal. App. 3d 1438 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1989

(See City of San Diego v. Board of Supervisors (Super. Ct. San Diego County, 1987, No. 589497).) … (Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].)

Chapin v. City Commission

149 Cal. App. 2d 40 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1957

(Wallace v. City of Fresno, 42 Cal.2d 180, 185 [ 265 P.2d 884 ]; see Packer v. Board of Retirement, 35 Cal.2d 212, 214, 218-219 [ 217 P.2d 660 ].)” … The writ may be issued to compel a municipal board and officers to do an act specifically enjoined by law. (Packer v. Board of Retirement, 35 Cal.2d 212 [ 217 P.2d 660 ] ; Sweesy v. Los Angeles etc.

Fleming v. Capistrano Unif. School Dist. CA4/3

California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 2015

Dist. v. Peters (1928) 88 Cal.App. 731, 736 [board approval of contract required].) … Brown Act, Government Code section 54950 et seq. (the Brown Act).

Chilson v. Jerome

102 Cal. App. 635 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1929

(People v. Pacific Implement Co., 130 Cal. 442 [ 62 Pac. 739 ]; McNeil v. Kingsbury, 190 Cal. 406 [ 213 Pac. 50 ]; Riley v. Forbes, 193 Cal. 740 [ 227 Pac. 768 ]; Bateman v. … (People v. Pacific Implement Co., supra; In re Johnson (Ex parte Cannon), 167 Cal. 142 [ 138 Pac. 740 ] ; In re Mitchell, 120 Cal. 384 [ 52 Pac. 799 ]; Board of Education v. Talbert, 52 Cal. App. 657 [ 199 Pac. 555 ].)

Moss v. County of Humboldt

76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 428 · California Court of Appeal · May 7, 2008

(b)]; Benton v. Board of Supervisors (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467, 1477-1481 [ 277 Cal.Rptr. 481 ] (Benton).)” (American Canyon Community United for Responsible Growth v. … Chaparral Greens v.

Paulino v. Civil Service Commission

175 Cal. App. 3d 962 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1985

(Macfarlane v. Dept. Alcoholic Bev. Control (1958) 51 Cal.2d 84, 91 [ 330 P.2d 769 ]; Brown v. Gordon (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 659, 667 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 901 ].) … (Blake v. State Personnel Board (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 541, 554 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 50 ].)

Santa Cruz Oil Corp. v. Milnor

55 Cal. App. 2d 56 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1942

In 1938 the Supreme Court rendered opinions in the cases of Epperson v. Jordan, 12 Cal.2d 61 [ 82 P.2d 445 ] ; Vandeleur v. Jordan, 12 Cal.2d 71 [ 82 P.2d 455 ], and Brown v. Jordan, 12 Cal.2d 75 [ 82 P.2d 450 ]. … In Smith v.

Memorial Hospitals Assn. v. Randol

38 Cal. App. 4th 1300 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1995

Western Oil & Gas Assn. v. Air Resources Board (1984) 37 Cal.3d 502, 511 [ 208 Cal.Rptr. 850 , 691 P.2d 606 ].) … (Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d *1306 432, 439 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 777 P.2d 610 ]; Green v.

2,022 Ranch L.L.C. v. Superior Court

7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 197 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 5, 2004

In an unfair labor practices proceeding before the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, the board reviewed, in camera, communications between the attorney and management. (Id. at p. 31.) … (Weil & Brown, Cal.

Crespinel v. Color Corp. of America

160 Cal. App. 2d 386 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1958

In the event that it becomes necessary to provide a seat on the Board of Directors, Crespinel agrees that he will, upon the reguest of a majority of the Board of Directors forthwith resign as a member of the said Board in … The agreement in question does not come within the prohibition stated in Trumbo v.

Krusesky v. Baugh

138 Cal. App. 3d 562 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1982

State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 172-174 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ].) … (See Brown v. Bleiberg (1982) 32 Cal.3d 426, 437 [ 186 Cal. Rptr. 228 , 651 P.2d 815 ]; Olivas v. Weiner (1954) 127 Cal.

Harvard Investment Co. v. Gap Stores, Inc.

156 Cal. App. 3d 704 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1984

Clearly, the application of the Bennett v. Brown rationale is appropriate under the present circumstances. … (See, e.g., Shain v. City of Albany, supra, 106 Cal.App.3d 294, 297-300 ; Brown v.

Batten v. WCAB, Long Beach Memorial

California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 2015

ADJ3781289) Petitioner, v. … ADJ3781289) Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD; LONG BEACH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al., Respondents.

Jones v. Palm Springs Unified School District

170 Cal. App. 3d 518 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1985

(People v. Ramirez, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 268 , italics added.) Quoting from Board of Regents v. … In Barthuli v.

Bearman v. Superior Court

11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 644 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 2004

(See Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669 , 680 *469 [ 156 Cal.Rptr. 55 ] (Gherardini).) … The Medical Board correctly observes that the filing of a lawsuit may be deemed a waiver of privacy as to matters embraced by the action. (See Britt v.