Case law

Vang v. Board of Trustees of Cal. State University CA5

California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 2020

Filed 12/17/20 Vang v. Board of Trustees of Cal. … (Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners (1998) 17 Cal.4th 763, 775 [courts usually adopt the plain meaning of statutory language].)

Diablo Valley College Faculty Senate v. Contra Costa Community College District

56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 294 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 2007

(Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. Cal. Emp. Com. (1944) 24 Cal.2d 753, 756-757 [ 151 P.2d 233 ]; Spanish Speaking Citizens’ Foundation, Inc. v. … Co. v. Quackenbush (1999) 77 Cal.App.4th 65, 71 [ 91 Cal.Rptr.2d 381 ].)

Vanderstok v. Bank of America

29 Cal. App. 3d 731 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1972

Palm Springs Alpine Estates, 66 Cal.2d 782, 788 [ 59 Cal.Rptr. 141 , 427 P.2d 805 ]; Vallelunga v. Gomes, 102 Cal.App.2d 374, 382 [ 227 P.2d 550 ].)” (Brown v. Brown, 22 Cal.App.3d 82, 84 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 311 ].) … Relying on Brown v.

Sargon Enterprises v. Browne George Ross

California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 2017

BC546363) v. BROWNE GEORGE ROSS LLP, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Fredrick C. Shaller, Judge. … Heily & Blase (1992) 3 Cal.4th 1, 32 [(Moncharsh)], Board of Education v. Round Valley Teachers Assn. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 269, 275–277 [(Round Valley)], and Richey v.

Findley v. Garrett

109 Cal. App. 2d 166 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1952

In McCloskey v. … In Dowling *177 v.

In re Anthony

236 Cal. App. 4th 204 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2015

(See Tennison v. … (People v. Chacon (2007) 40 Cal.4th 558, 564; see also People v.

Kurz v. Syrus Systems, LLC

221 Cal. App. 4th 748 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 2013

(Castleman v. … Kurz v.

No Wetlands Landfill Expansion v. County of Marin

204 Cal. App. 4th 573 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 2012

(See Sierra Club v. … California v. California Quartet, Ltd. (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 517 [ 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 889 ] is misplaced.

Finch Aerospace Corp. v. City of San Diego

8 Cal. App. 5th 1248 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 2017

II BACKGROUND A According to the allegations in the complaint, in 1996 Brown Field Aviation Ventures leased space at Brown Field … (Johnson v. State of California (1968) 69 Cal.2d 782, 800; City of Costa Mesa v. D'Alessio Investments, LLC (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 358, 383 (Costa Mesa); Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 649.)

People v. Gibson

160 Cal. App. 2d 535 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1958

He said at the trial the natural color of his hair had been restored (brown) due to his confinement in jail. … (People v. Glaze, 139 Cal. 154 [ 72 P. 965 ]; Carpenter v. Ashley, 148 Cal. 422, 426 [ 83 P. 444 , 7 Ann.Cas. 601].) Any evidence offered by way of impeachment must be competent and cannot be based on hearsay.

Messick v. Houx Bros., Inc.

105 Cal. App. 637 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 1930

In the case of Andrews v. … In Brown v.

Earley v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 2023

ADJ4430885, v. … (See Le Vesque v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 627, 634–635 & fn. 11 (Le Vesque); Evans v. Workmen’s Comp.

George v. Beaty

85 Cal. App. 525 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 1927

Good v. Howard, 174 Ind. 358 [ 92 N. E. 115 ], American Eng. Co. v. Metropolitan By-Products Co., 280 Fed. 677 , St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Messenger, 26 Okl. 590 [ 110 Pac. 893 ], and Double v. … It is said in State v.

Santa Ana School District v. Talbert

19 Cal. App. 104 · California Court of Appeal · May 17, 1912

of education and the same were duly certified to the board of supervisors of Orange county, together with all proceedings had in the premises; that on the ninth day of January, 1912, said board authorized and directed the … (State v. Conkling, 19 Cal. 501 ; Mack v. Jastro, 126 Cal. 130, *107 [ 58 Pac. 372 ].)

People v. Cain

97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 836 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 8, 2000

[Citation.]’ ” (People v. Balestra (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 57, 63 [ 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 77 ], citing People v. Whisenand (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1383, 1391 .) … The Board adopted a set of regulations for the express purpose of enforcing and implementing Government Code section 13959. (Graham v. State Bd. of Control (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 253, 258 [ 39 Cal.Rptr.2d 146 ].

Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'n

60 Cal. App. 4th 1053 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1998

(Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 865, 875 [ 151 Cal.Rptr. 285 , 587 P.2d 1098 ]; see also Brown v. Rahman (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1458, 1461-1462 [ 282 Cal.Rptr. 815 ]; Ceresino v. Fire Ins. … (D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 14-15 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ]; Kilgore v. Younger (1982) 30 Cal.3d 770, 784-785 [ 180 Cal.Rptr. 657 , 640 P.2d 793 ]; State Board of Pharmacy v.

People v. Bonner

5 Cal. App. 2d 314 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1935

(People v. Kempley, 205 Cal. 441, 456 [ 271 Pac. 478 ]; People v. Davis, 210 Cal. 540, 549 [ 293 Pac. 32 ].) … (People v. Jensen, 76 Cal. App. 558, 562 [ 244 Pac. 1086 ].)

West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San Francisco

256 Cal. App. 2d 357 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1967

Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals, 66 Cal.2d 34 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 672 , 423 P.2d 824 ] 2 The court, citing Brougher v. … Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals, supra, to argue that the permit had been granted within the meaning of section 150 when the Board overruled the denial of the planning officer.

King City Union High School District v. Waibel

2 Cal. App. 2d 65 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 1934

Such a board is a continuing body and in legal contemplation the new board is the same board that entered into the contract. (Cope v. County of Sutter, 206 Cal. 445, at 454 [ 274 Pac. 750 ].) … W. 73 ], and Tate v. School District No. 11 of Gentry Co., 324 Mo. 477 [ 23 S. W. (2d) 1013 , 70 A. L. R. 771].

East Peninsula Education Council, Inc. v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District

210 Cal. App. 3d 155 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 1989

(Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247,259 . . . .)” (Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 390 [ 253 Cal.Rptr. 426 , 764 P.2d 278 ].) … (Dehne v.