Case law

In re Tapia

207 Cal. App. 4th 1104 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 2012

(See, e.g., Roberts v. … (Roberts v. United States, supra, 445 U.S. at p. 558 .) Tapia’s privilege, however, did not extend past the time “sentence ha[d] been fixed and the judgment of conviction ha[d] become final.” (Mitchell v.

Cleland v. Superior Court

52 Cal. App. 2d 530 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1942

(Welsh v. Bramlet, 98 Cal. 219 [ 33 Pac. 66 ].) Likewise it has been held the Legislature may not delegate those powers to a board of supervisors. (People v. Wheeler, 136 Cal. 652 [ 69 Pac. 435 ]; City of Woodland v. … Harbor Commissioners, 81 Cal. [19], 37 [ 22 Pac. 278 ]; Farrell v. Board of Trustees, 85 Cal. [408] 415 [ 24 Pac. 868 ].)

Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Public Employment Relations Board CA3

California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 2021

No. 2660-S at p. 17, citing Cal Fire Local 2881 v. Public Employment Relations Bd. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 813, 819 (Cal Fire); State Personnel Board, supra, PERB Dec. … pending before a Board agent or the Board itself.’

Gen. Accident Ins. Co. of Am. v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.

55 Cal. App. 4th 1444 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1997

Although it first noted that the asset-purchase agreement did not assign the Allied policy to Brown-Forman, the court found the Allied policy was available to Brown-Forman by operation of law. … As a result, even though the parties did not assign Allied’s policy in the agreement, the right to indemnity under the policy transferred to Brown-Forman by operation of law.” (Northern Ins. Co. of New York v.

Hardin Oldsmobile v. New Motor Vehicle Bd.

52 Cal. App. 4th 585 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1997

In the view of the Board and Honda, the Board has plenary power to award compensatory damages. To do so, they argue, the Board follows the procedure upheld in a Court of Appeal opinion, McKee v. … Neither the statute defining the duties of the Board nor the judicial powers clause of the Constitution allows such a broadening of the Board’s role. (See McHugh v.

McKinney v. Red Top Cab Co.

113 Cal. App. 637 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1931

(Roche v. Llewellyn Iron Works Co., 140 Cal. 563 [ 74 Pac. 147 ]; Pierce v. United Gas & Elec. Co., 161 Cal. 176 [ 118 Pac. 700 ]; Citti v. Bava, 204 Cal. 136 [ 266 Pac. 954 ].) … (Girard v. Irvine, 97 Cal. App. 877 [ 275 Pac. 840 ].)

Butler v. Rio Hondo Community College Dist. CA2/2

California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 2015

The errors implicated potential violations of the Ralph M. 3 Brown Act3 (Brown Act) insofar as ASB agendas did not correctly reflect the actions of the ASB Governing Board … (Serri v.

Focus Cable of Oakland, Inc. v. County of Alameda

173 Cal. App. 3d 519 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1985

Superior Court (1941) 19 Cal.2d 189, 195 [ 120 P.2d 26 ]; Midstate Theatres, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1975) 46 Cal.App.3d 204, 212 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 894 ]; County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Bd. … [Citation.]” (.Midstate Theatres, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 46 Cal.App.3d 204, 209 .)

In Re Nicholls

74 Cal. App. 504 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1925

App. 389 [ 141 Pac. 831 ]; Santa Barbara v. Sherman, 61 Cal. 57 ). … App. 567 [ 126 Pac. 856 ]; Roberts v. Police Court, 148 Cal. 131 [ 82 Pac. 838 ]).

Norcross v. Winters

209 Cal. App. 2d 207 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1962

In Drennan v. … Justice Peters in Klose v.

Topanga Ass'n for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles

214 Cal. App. 3d 1348 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1989

(Youngblood v. Board of Supervisors (1978) 22 Cal.3d 644, 652 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 242 , 586 P.2d 556 ].) … (Handler v. Board of Supervisors (1952) 39 Cal.2d 282, 286 [ 246 P.2d 671 ].)

In re Anthony

236 Cal. App. 4th 204 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2015

(See Tennison v. … (People v. Chacon (2007) 40 Cal.4th 558, 564; see also People v.

Palm Springs Tennis Club v. Rangel

86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 73 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1999

on the board of directors. … Superior Court, supra, 181 Cal.App.3d 377, 387 ; see also Martin v.

Jing Huang v. Bicycle Casino, Inc.

4 Cal. App. 5th 329 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 2016

safe-boarding procedures. … (Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400 (2001) 25 Cal.4th 763, 767; Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 317, 334.)

Earley v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 2023

ADJ4430885, v. … (See Le Vesque v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 627, 634–635 & fn. 11 (Le Vesque); Evans v. Workmen’s Comp.

City of Fontana v. Atkinson

212 Cal. App. 2d 499 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1963

BROWN (R. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 47 Cal.2d 384, 388 [ 303 P.2d 1034 ], and cases cited.

Findley v. Garrett

109 Cal. App. 2d 166 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1952

In McCloskey v. … In Dowling *177 v.

City of San Jose v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.

California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 2024

“The charter of a municipality is its constitution” (Brown v. City of Berkeley (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 223, 231), and “a charter city may not act in conflict with its charter.” (Domar Electric, Inc. v. … (Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 665.) We review 11 questions of constitutional and statutory interpretation de novo. 8 (City of Lafayette v.

California Teachers Ass'n v. Butte Community College District

48 Cal. App. 4th 1293 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 23, 1996

(Greer v. Board of Education (1975) 47 Cal.App.3d 98, 105 [ 121 Cal.Rptr. 542 ].) … (Aylward v. State Board etc. Examiners, supra, 31 Cal.2d at p. 839 .)

Napa Savings Bank v. County of Napa

17 Cal. App. 545 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1911

(Burke v. Badlam, 57 Cal. 594 ; Germania Trust Co. v. San Francisco, 128 Cal. 589 , [ 61 Pac. 178 ].) … But the rule here is as stated in People v.