Case law

People v. One 1950 Mercury Sedan

116 Cal. App. 2d 746 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1953

(People v. One 1939 Buick Coupe, 56 Cal.App.2d 163 [ 132 P.2d 308 ]; cf. People v. One 1940 Ford, V-8 Coupe, 36 Cal.2d 471 [ 224 P.2d 677 ].) … Justice Carter in Simpson v.

People v. Silverstein

52 Cal. App. 2d 725 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1942

(United States v. Marrin, 227 Fed. 314 .) … The United States could waive its right to the custody of the prisoner (Cato v.

People v. Douglas M.

220 Cal. App. 4th 1068 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 2013

(People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 319-320 (Brown); accord, Tapia v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 282, 287 (Tapia).) … (See Brown, at p. 320.)

California Association of Professional Scientists v. Schwarzenegger

40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 354 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 6, 2006

(City of Huntington Beach v. Board of Administration (1992) 4 Cal.4th 462, 466 [ 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 514 , 841 P.2d 1034 ].) … The Dills Act also “vests broad jurisdiction in [the Board] to investigate and act upon unfair labor charges and alleged violations of the act.” (Sullivan v.

Leymel v. Johnson

105 Cal. App. 694 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1930

(Cunning v. Carr, 69 Cal. App. 230 [230 Pac. 987]; Walker v. Rich, supra; Kennedy v. Board of Education, supra; Patton v. Board of Health, 127 Cal. 388 [ 78 Am. St. Rep. 66 , 59 Pac. 702 ].) … (Fairchild v. Board of Education, 107 Cal. 92 [ 40 Pac. 26 ]; Loehr v. Board of Education, 12 Cal. App. 671 [ 108 Pac. 325 ].)

Mohilef v. Janovici

51 Cal. App. 4th 267 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1996

(See Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) 408 U.S. 564, 571 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 557 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 ]; Traverso v. People ex rel. … (Chongris v. Board of Appeals of Town of Andover (1st Cir. 1987) 811 F.2d 36, 41-42 ].)

Smith v. City of Los Angeles

190 Cal. App. 2d 112 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1961

In Price v. … In Price v.

Running Fence Corp. v. Superior Court

51 Cal. App. 3d 400 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1975

(See part V below.) … In Rescue Army v.

Anderson v. City of Los Angeles

30 Cal. App. 3d 219 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1973

(Wendlan v. City of Alameda (1956) 46 Cal.2d 786, 791 [ 298 P.2d 863 ]; Lesem v. Board of Retirement (1960) 183 Cal.App.2d 289, 298 [ 6 Cal.Rptr. 608 ]; Gray v. Bolger (1958) 157 Cal.App.2d 583, 587 [ 321 P.2d 485 ].) … Proc., § 1085; Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1943) 23 Cal.2d 303, 315 [ 144 P.2d 4 ]; Spear v. Board of Medical Examiners (1956) 146 Cal.App.2d 207, 212 [ 303 P.2d 886 ]; Allen v.

Riggs v. Guedemann

94 Cal. App. 217 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1928

{Brown v. Plummer, 70 Cal. 337 [ 11 Pac. 631 ]; Nathan v. Porter, 36 Cal. App. 356, 359 [ 172 Pac. 170 ].) The forty days allowed appellant for filing his transcript of record expired on September 9th. … {Fiske v. Gosbey, 168 Cal. 334 [ 143 Pac. 611 ]; Brown v. Superior Court, 157 Cal. 141 [ 165 Pac. 429 ].) The appeals are dismissed. York, J., and Houser, J., concurred.

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance. v. County of Orange

187 Cal. App. 3d 1141 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1985

(See Bret Harte Inn, Inc. v. … As the court in De Luz Homes, Inc. v.

Gluck v. City and County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2025

(City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency (2025) 604 U.S. ___ [145 S.Ct. 704, 707] (Environmental Protection Agency) [detailing combined system]; Edward Brown & Sons v. … (See, e.g., Edward Brown & Sons, supra, 36 Cal.2d at p. 274; County of Riverside v. Whitlock (1972) 22 Cal.App.3d 863, 874, fn. 9 [referencing public improvements to “storm and sanitary sewers”], Ramseier v.

People Ex Rel. Mosk v. City of Santa Barbara

192 Cal. App. 2d 342 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1961

Board of Supervisors, 32 Cal.App. 495, 504 [ 163 P. 341 ] [storm water districts] ; Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 119 Cal.App.2d 29, 38 [ 258 P.2d 570 ] [Water Code, section 20700, irrigation districts]. … See also Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles v. Franchise Tax Board, 55 Cal.2d 407, 422 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 289 , 359 P.2d 625 ].)

Jensen v. Superior Court

154 Cal. App. 3d 533 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1984

The stay in Johnson, et al. v. Short, et al., San Diego Superior Court Case No. 491737 is lifted. Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied May 2, 1984. … & Company, p. 98.) 5 People v.

Hunter v. County of Santa Barbara

110 Cal. App. 698 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1930

The principle involved is also supported in the following cases: Jenkins v. Williams, 14 Cal. App. 89 [ 111 Pac. 116 ] ; McMahon v. Board of Supervisors, 46 Cal. 204 ; Peery v. City of Los Angeles, 187 Cal. 753 [19 A. … Appellants’ counsel also assert that the eases of McBean v. Redick, Treanor v. Houghton and Kutchin v.

McKinney v. Red Top Cab Co.

113 Cal. App. 637 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1931

(Roche v. Llewellyn Iron Works Co., 140 Cal. 563 [ 74 Pac. 147 ]; Pierce v. United Gas & Elec. Co., 161 Cal. 176 [ 118 Pac. 700 ]; Citti v. Bava, 204 Cal. 136 [ 266 Pac. 954 ].) … (Girard v. Irvine, 97 Cal. App. 877 [ 275 Pac. 840 ].)

City of Petaluma v. County of Sonoma CA1/4

California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2014

(Environmental Council v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 135 Cal.App.3d 428, 439–440.) 1. … Brown Act On October 12, 2010, the Board held a public meeting on Revised Project II, and heard comments from the public.

People v. Meals

49 Cal. App. 3d 702 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1975

Brown ... 18 Cal.App.3d 1052, 1054-1055 ).” (People v. Castro, supra, 42 Cal.App.3d at p. 964 .) As in Castro and People v. … As in People v. Brown, supra, 18 Cal.App.3d 1052 , appellant’s consideration for his plea of guilty was not fully explained to him in the plea bargain.

CNA Ins. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

58 Cal. App. 4th 211 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1997

Evidence indicated Baker spent between 80 and 99 percent of her working hours on board the vessels to which she was assigned. … Board of Governors (R.I. 1994) 636 A.2d 1313 [Jones Act settlement extinguishes employer’s state workers’ compensation obligations]; Hagens v.

Arias v. Superior Court

63 Cal. Rptr. 3d 272 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 2007

Code of Civil Procedure section 382 states...."]; Brown v. … Weaver v.