Case law

Tapley v. Abbott

111 Cal. App. 397 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1931

In the case of Lanterman v. Anderson, 36 Cal. … (State Board of Medical Examiners v. Noble, 65 Colo. 410 [ 177 Pac. 141 ].)

California School Employees Ass'n v. Coachella Valley Unified School District

65 Cal. App. 3d 913 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1977

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; see also People v. … (Fidler v. Board of Trustees, 112 Cal.App. 296 . . . ; Abraham v. Sims, 2 Cal. (2d) 698 . . . .)

Heist v. County of Colusa

163 Cal. App. 3d 841 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1984

San Francisco (1897) 115 Cal. 555, 560 [ 47 P. 453 ]; Quinchard v. Board of Trustees (1896) 113 Cal. 664, 669 [ 45 P. 856 ]; Bowles v. Antonetti, supra, 241 Cal.App.2d at *846 p. 286; Cramer v. … (Beals v.

People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.

92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 115 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 2000

(State Bd. of Education v. Honig, supra, 13 Cal.App.4th at p. 751 ; see also State Board v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners (1953) 40 Cal.2d 436, 448-449 [ 254 P.2d 29 ]; Bayside Timber Co. v. … (See Skinner v.

Bank of America v. County of Los Angeles

270 Cal. App. 2d 165 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1969

Co. v. Eshleman, 166 Cal. 640 [ 137 P. 1119 , Ann.Cas. 1915C 822, 50 L.R.A. N.S. 652]; Granone v. County of Los Angeles, 231 Cal.App.2d 629 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 34 ]; Frustuck v. … Board of Control, 23 Cal.2d 343 [ 144 P.2d 818 ]; and People v. Ricciardi, 23 Cal.2d 390 [ 144 P.2d 799 ].) A line of federal cases headed by the Holmes opinion in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v.

Morris v. Castro

166 Cal. App. 3d 33 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1985

(Weaver v. Graham, supra, 450 U.S. at p. 29, fn. 12 [ 67 L.Ed.2d at p. 23 ]; Dobbert v. Florida (1977) 432 U.S. 282, 293 [ 53 L.Ed.2d 344, 356 , 97 S.Ct. 2290 ].) … In Weaver v.

Council of Directors & Supervisors v. Los Angeles Unified School District

35 Cal. App. 3d 147 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 1973

(See Holbrook v. Board of Education, 37 Cal.2d 316, 334 [ 231 P.2d 853 ]; Board of Education v. Swan, 41 Cal.2d 546, 555-556 [ 261 P.2d 261 ], overruled on a different point in Bekiaris v. … (See Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) 408 U.S. 564, 569, 575-578 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 556, 560-561 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 ].)

McCann v. Welden

153 Cal. App. 3d 814 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1984

(Brown v. … (See DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 174 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ].)

Camarillo Sanitary Dist. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 2025

(Carrancho v. California Air Resources Board (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1264–1265.) … (Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Board of Equalization, supra, 57 Cal.4th at p. 415.)

California Interstate Telephone Co. v. Prescott

228 Cal. App. 2d 408 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1964

(County of Riverside v. Brown, supra, 30 Cal.App.2d 747, 749 .) … (County of Riverside v. Brown, supra, 30 Cal.App.2d 747, 749; La Mesa-Spring Valley School Dist. v. Otsuka, supra, 57 Cal.2d 309, 316 .)

Miller v. Superior Court

50 Cal. App. 4th 1665 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 1996

Motor Corp. v. … Exchange v.

Southern California Hardwood & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los Angeles

49 Cal. App. 712 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 1920

In the case of Clunie v. … And in San Jose Gas Co. v.

Raymond v. Fresno City Unified Sch. Dist.

123 Cal. App. 2d 626 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 1954

As was said in Wallace v. … (Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., 100 Cal.App. 270 [ 279 P. 1080 ]; McColgan v.

Oakland Unified School District v. Olicker

25 Cal. App. 3d 1098 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 8, 1972

(See Board of Education v. … (Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, at p. 235; see Board of Trustees v.

County of Sacramento v. Glann

14 Cal. App. 780 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 1910

In Johnston v. … In People v.

Riggs v. Guedemann

94 Cal. App. 217 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1928

{Brown v. Plummer, 70 Cal. 337 [ 11 Pac. 631 ]; Nathan v. Porter, 36 Cal. App. 356, 359 [ 172 Pac. 170 ].) The forty days allowed appellant for filing his transcript of record expired on September 9th. … {Fiske v. Gosbey, 168 Cal. 334 [ 143 Pac. 611 ]; Brown v. Superior Court, 157 Cal. 141 [ 165 Pac. 429 ].) The appeals are dismissed. York, J., and Houser, J., concurred.

People v. Lanterman

9 Cal. App. 674 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1909

’ must be one which the board is authorized to allow (People v. … The question as to whether or not the board had authority to allow the claim, if genuine, is a question of law (Branham et al. v. City of San Jose, 24 Cal. 585 ; Callahan v.

Mullin Lumber Co. v. Chandler

185 Cal. App. 3d 1127 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1986

The complaint alleged Mullin sold Chandler the board that broke and the board was defective. … Co. v.

People v. One 1950 Mercury Sedan

116 Cal. App. 2d 746 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1953

(People v. One 1939 Buick Coupe, 56 Cal.App.2d 163 [ 132 P.2d 308 ]; cf. People v. One 1940 Ford, V-8 Coupe, 36 Cal.2d 471 [ 224 P.2d 677 ].) … Justice Carter in Simpson v.

Maurer v. Weatherby

1 Cal. App. 243 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1905

Boards of equalization cannot increase an assessment unless they have evidence before them justifying such increase. (Oakland v. Southern Pac. Co., 131 Cal. 230 , [ 63 Pac. 371 ].) … (Lewis v. Colgan, 115 Cal. 529 , [ 47 Pac. 357 ]; Kansas Pacific Ry. Co. v. Riley County Commrs., 20 Kan. 141 ; City of Grand Rapids v. Welleman, 85 Mich, 234 , [ 48 N. W. 534 ] ; Bardrick v.