Case law

Tom Jones Enterprises, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles

212 Cal. App. 4th 1283 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 2013

Brown v. Kennard (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 40, 49-50 [ 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 891 ]. . . . … For example, in Brown v.

Mission Springs Water Dist. v. Desert Water Agency

California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 2024

V. … (Professional Engineers in California Government v. Kempton (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1016, 1038.) When two statutes are irreconcilable, “‘the later statute prevails.’” (Briggs v. Brown (2017) 3 Cal.5th 808, 840.)

Southern California Hardwood & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los Angeles

49 Cal. App. 712 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 1920

In the case of Clunie v. … And in San Jose Gas Co. v.

Raymond v. Fresno City Unified Sch. Dist.

123 Cal. App. 2d 626 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 1954

As was said in Wallace v. … (Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., 100 Cal.App. 270 [ 279 P. 1080 ]; McColgan v.

Riggs v. Guedemann

94 Cal. App. 217 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1928

{Brown v. Plummer, 70 Cal. 337 [ 11 Pac. 631 ]; Nathan v. Porter, 36 Cal. App. 356, 359 [ 172 Pac. 170 ].) The forty days allowed appellant for filing his transcript of record expired on September 9th. … {Fiske v. Gosbey, 168 Cal. 334 [ 143 Pac. 611 ]; Brown v. Superior Court, 157 Cal. 141 [ 165 Pac. 429 ].) The appeals are dismissed. York, J., and Houser, J., concurred.

Imp. Irrig. Dist. v. St. Wat. Resources Ctrl.

225 Cal. App. 3d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1990

In Mandel v. … In Sklar v. Franchise Tax Board (1986) 185 Cal. App.3d 616 [ 230 Cal.

People v. Lanterman

9 Cal. App. 674 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1909

’ must be one which the board is authorized to allow (People v. … The question as to whether or not the board had authority to allow the claim, if genuine, is a question of law (Branham et al. v. City of San Jose, 24 Cal. 585 ; Callahan v.

Mullin Lumber Co. v. Chandler

185 Cal. App. 3d 1127 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1986

The complaint alleged Mullin sold Chandler the board that broke and the board was defective. … Co. v.

Olson v. County of Sacramento

38 Cal. App. 3d 958 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1974

Hess Co. v. … In Collins v.

CNA Ins. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

58 Cal. App. 4th 211 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1997

Evidence indicated Baker spent between 80 and 99 percent of her working hours on board the vessels to which she was assigned. … Board of Governors (R.I. 1994) 636 A.2d 1313 [Jones Act settlement extinguishes employer’s state workers’ compensation obligations]; Hagens v.

People v. Silverstein

52 Cal. App. 2d 725 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1942

(United States v. Marrin, 227 Fed. 314 .) … The United States could waive its right to the custody of the prisoner (Cato v.

People v. Douglas M.

220 Cal. App. 4th 1068 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 2013

(People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 319-320 (Brown); accord, Tapia v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 282, 287 (Tapia).) … (See Brown, at p. 320.)

United Firefighters v. City of Los Angeles

153 Cal. App. 3d 383 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 1984

(See Taylor v. Crane (1979) 24 Cal.3d 442, 450-452 [ 155 Cal.Rptr. 695 , 595 P.2d 129 ].) In Taylor v. … (Taylor v. Crane, supra, 24 Cal.3d at p. 452 .)

Sferlazzo v. Oliphant

24 Cal. App. 81 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 1914

(Coffey v. Greenfield, 62 Cal. 602 ; Palmer & Rey v. Marysville etc. Publishing Co., 90 Cal. 168 , [ 27 Pac. 21 ].) … (Granger v. Original Empire etc. Co., 59 Cal. 678 ; Stockton etc. Works v. Houser, 109 Cal. 1 , [ 41 Pac. 809 ]; Barrell v. Lakeview Land Co., 122 Cal. 129 , [ 54 Pac. 594 ] ; Balfour, Guthrie Co. v.

Preserve Poway v. City of Poway

245 Cal. App. 4th 560 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 2016

Corp. v. … For example, in City of Pasadena v.

Devlin v. Wright

20 Cal. App. 807 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1912

Devlin v. J. H. Donnelly et al. (No. 1041), ante, p. 495 [ 129 P. 607 ], should be determinative of the decision in this case. On the authority of that case, the writ is denied.

Lovett v. Carrasco

63 Cal. App. 4th 48 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1998

(Lee v. Brown (1976) 18 Cal.3d 110, 114 [ 132 Cal.Rptr. 649 , 553 P.2d 1121 ].) … Bell v. Shine, Browne & Diamond, supra, 36 Cal.4th at p. 1024.)

Mohilef v. Janovici

51 Cal. App. 4th 267 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1996

(See Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) 408 U.S. 564, 571 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 557 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 ]; Traverso v. People ex rel. … (Chongris v. Board of Appeals of Town of Andover (1st Cir. 1987) 811 F.2d 36, 41-42 ].)

Oil Tool Exchange, Inc. v. Schuh

67 Cal. App. 2d 288 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1944

In Brown v. … (See, also, Forbes v. Board of Missions, 17 Cal.2d 332, 338 [ 110 P.2d 3 ]; Bee v. Cooper, 217 Cal. 96 [ 17 P.2d 740 ].) In Elizalde v.

McCann v. Welden

153 Cal. App. 3d 814 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1984

(Brown v. … (See DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 174 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ].)