Case law

Bd. of Dental Examr's v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 653 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 13, 1998

While a remand order is not appeal-able (see Cobb v. University of So. … (IFS Industries, Inc. v. Stephens (1984) 159 Cal.App.3d 740, 744, 756 [ 205 Cal.Rptr. 915 ].) In Green v.

Krausen v. Solano County Junior College District

42 Cal. App. 3d 394 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 1974

(Otto v. Davie (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 570, 575 [ 110 Cal.Rptr. 114 ].) … Code, § 54956; Lucas v. Board of Trustees (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 988 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 431 ].)

Mitchell v. County Sanitation District Number One

164 Cal. App. 2d 133 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 14, 1958

Nor does statutory authority or the record show Lowery in this case had any control over the board’s litigation, which right at all times was vested with the governing board. An Illinois case, People ex rel. Altorfer v. … (De Wit v. Glazier, 149 Cal.App.2d 75 [ 307 P.2d 1031 ]; Doak v. Bruson, 152 Cal. 17 [ 91 P. 1001 ]; West Coast Securities Co. v. Kilbourn, 110 Cal.App. 293 [ 294 P. 57 ].)

Ticor Title Insurance v. Rancho Santa Fe Ass'n

177 Cal. App. 3d 726 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1986

(Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County Dist. Council of Carpenters (1979) 25 Cal.3d 317, 330 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 370 , 599 P.2d 676 ]; White v. Dorfman, supra, 116 Cal.App.3d 892, 897 .) … They could have included additional language in paragraph 165 or an additional paragraph in article V, “Duration, Enforcement, Amendment,” stating the Covenant’s provisions could be changed or modified by the Board acting

Laurelle v. Bush

17 Cal. App. 409 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1911

(Barnes v. Miner, 122 Fed. 480, 487 .) … (Goytino v. McAleer, 4 Cal. App. 655 , [ 88 Pac. 992 ].)

Preserve Poway v. City of Poway

245 Cal. App. 4th 560 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 2016

Corp. v. … For example, in City of Pasadena v.

Mobile Medical Services for Physicians & Advanced Practice Nurses, Inc. v. Rajaram

241 Cal. App. 4th 164 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 13, 2015

(Navellier v. Sletten (2002) 29 Cal.4th 82, 88.) … (Simmons v. Allstate Ins. Co. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1073.)

California Grape & Tree Fruit League v. Industrial Welfare Commission

268 Cal. App. 2d 692 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 1969

Franchise Tax Board v. … Co. v.

Kinney v. Sacramento City Employees' Retirement System

77 Cal. App. 2d 779 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1947

Co. v. Industrial Acc. … Here, as in the case of Dillard v.

Central Mutual Insurance v. Schmidt

152 Cal. App. 2d 671 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 1957

The court in reversing a judgment for damages for deceit against Brown, one of the defendants in the case, had this to say (p. 137): “The defendant Brown testified as follows: ‘I am a resident of Santa Monica, and one of … .” *675 And in Montgomery v.

People v. Guzman

California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 2015

(People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 319-320 (Brown).) … (Brown, supra, 54 Cal.4th at pp. 324-325, original italics, fn. omitted; see Evangelatos v. Superior Court (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1188, 1209.)

Maxwell Cafe, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

142 Cal. App. 2d 73 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1956

(Mantzoros v. State Board of Equalization, 87 Cal.App.2d 140, 144 [ 196 P.2d 657 ] ; Cornell v. Reilly, 127 Cal.App.2d 178 [ 273 P.2d 572 ].) … Reilly, 125 Cal.App.2d 334 [ 270 P.2d 547 ]; Marcucci v. Board of Equalization, 138 Cal.App.2d 605 [ 292 P.2d 264 ].)

International Sound Technicians v. Superior Court

141 Cal. App. 2d 23 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1956

The board’s jurisdiction to prevent unfair labor practices of the kind involved here is exclusive (Garner v. Teamsters, C. & H. … (Moore v. Illinois Central R. Co., 312 U.S. 630 [ 61 S.Ct. 754 , 85 L.Ed. 1089 ] ; Slocum v. *31 Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 339 U.S. 239 [ 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795, 800 ]; Kuzma v.

Vietnamese-American Community etc. v. City of San Jose CA6

California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 2014

Thus, as this court has stated, the Brown Act “provides for open meetings for local legislative bodies such as city councils, boards of supervisors and school boards. (§ 54952, subd. (a).) … V.

James v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

55 Cal. App. 4th 1053 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1997

Petitioner Rebecca James seeks to annul the order of respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (the Board) after reconsideration. … (Hansen v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Bd. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 1179, 1184 [ 23 Cal.Rptr.2d 30 ].)

Speece v. Browne

229 Cal. App. 2d 487 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 2, 1964

The Record Plaintiff, Kathryn Speece, (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff), now deceased, 2 was the mother of defendant Erma Mae Browne and the mother-in-law of defendant James Browne (hereinafter referred to as defendants … In Free v.

People v. David G.

93 Cal. App. 3d 247 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1979

of Education v. … Brown (G. A.), P.

People v. Mendoza

165 Cal. App. 2d 731 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1958

(People v. Mullins, 145 Cal.App.2d 667, 671 [ 303 P.2d 58 ]; People v. Matthew, 194 Cal. 273, 279 [ 228 P. 424 ]; People v. Gidney, 10 Cal.2d 138, 144 [ 73 P.2d 1186 ]; People v. … In People v.

Torres v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

192 Cal. App. 2d 541 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1961

(Weiss v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 40 Cal.2d 772, 776 ; Altadena Community Church v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 109 Cal.App.2d 99, 105 .) … (Martin v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. Appeals Board, supra, 52 Cal.2d 238, 248 ; Hansen v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 43 Cal.App.2d 176, 179 .)

Universal Insurance v. Manhattan Motor Line, Inc.

82 Cal. App. 2d 425 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1947

(Romero v. Letts, 7 Cal.2d 503 [ 61 P.2d 449 ]; County of Humboldt v. Kay, 57 Cal.App.2d 115 [ 134 P.2d 501 ].) … (Solomon v. Federal Ins. Co., 176 Cal. 133 [ 167 P. 859 ] ; Purcell v. Pacific Automobile Ins. Co., 19 Cal.App.2d 230 [ 64 P.2d 1114 ] ; Bennett v. Northwestern Nat. Ins.