Case law

People v. Quiroga

16 Cal. App. 4th 961 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1993

When the officer stepped on the running board and reached into the car to turn the ignition switch, the defendant pushed the officer off the running board. In People v. … (Florida v. Royer (1983) 460 U.S. 491, 497-498 [ 75 L.Ed.2d 229, 235-237 , 103 S.Ct. 1319 ]; see also Kolender v. Lawson (1983) 461 U.S. 352 [ 75 L.Ed.2d 903 , 103 S.Ct. 1855 ]; Brown v.

People v. Rosalez

201 Cal. App. 2d 643 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1962

Emigh, 174 Cal.App.2d 392 [ 344 P.2d 851 ]; People v. Brown, 198 Cal.App.2d 232 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 789 ]; People v. Cole, 198 Cal.App.2d 561 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 686 ]; People v. Williams, 177 Cal.App.2d 581 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 387 ].) … Brown, J., and Stone, J., concurred.

Friends of Eel River v. Sonoma County Water Agency

134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 322 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 2003

Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ]; San Franciscans for Reasonable Growth, supra, 151 Cal.App.3d 61, 74 .) In Kings County Farm Bureau v. … (Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 862 [ 226 Cal.Rptr. 575 ], italics omitted.)

Fee v. Fitts

108 Cal. App. 551 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 1930

If, as assumed, a system of civil service has not been set up by the county then the provisions of general law apply (Jones v. De Shields, 187 Cal. 331 [ 202 Pac. 137 ]; Cronin v. Civil Service Com., 71 Cal. … In fact, we think appellant’s whole claim in this regard *557 is effectively disposed of by Cronin v. Civil Service Com., supra. Construing the same rules as we have now before us the court there said: “ . . .

Harrison v. Horton

5 Cal. App. 415 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1907

In Cashin v. … (Mechem on Public Officers, sec. 38; United States v. Maurice, 2 Brock. 96, [Fed. Cas. No. 15,747] ; Patton v. Board of Public Health, 127 Cal. 397 , [ 78 Am. St. Rep. 66 , 59 Pac. 702 ].) The judgment is reversed.

In Re Hyde

65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 162 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 7, 2007

(See People v. … The court in Irons v.

Westervelt v. McCullough

68 Cal. App. 198 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1924

Under the contract defendant agreed to pay to plaintiff $100 per month for the board and lodging agreed in the contract to he furnished thereunder. … Mental anguish is an element of actual damages for breach of contract” (Browning v. Fies, 4 Ala. App. 580 [ 58 South. 931 ]).

A. F. Gilmore Co. v. County of Los Angeles

186 Cal. App. 2d 471 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1960

(McClelland v. Board of Supervisors, 30 Cal.2d 124, 129 [ 180 P.2d 676 ] ; Eastern-Columbia, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles, 70 Cal.App.2d 497, 503 [ 161 P.2d 407 ]; Bank of America v. … The board seemingly preferred and accepted the opinion of the assessors’ witness to that of the witness of the appellants *478 and this the board was entitled to do. (City of Los Angeles v.

Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America

196 Cal. App. 2d 22 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1961

(O’Connor v. Mennie, 169 Cal. 217, 222 [ 146 P. 674 ].) ” (Alves v. Lopez, 159 Cal.App.2d 705, 707 [ 324 P.2d 652 ]; Bravo v. Sharkey, 97 Cal.App.2d 883 [ 218 P.2d 785 ].) … (Simmons v. California Institute of Technology, 34 Cal.2d 264 [ 209 P.2d 581 ]; Watson v.

People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.

92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 115 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 2000

(State Bd. of Education v. Honig, supra, 13 Cal.App.4th at p. 751 ; see also State Board v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners (1953) 40 Cal.2d 436, 448-449 [ 254 P.2d 29 ]; Bayside Timber Co. v. … (See Skinner v.

Moore v. City of Los Angeles

67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 218 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 2007

(Bohn v. Watson (1954) 130 Cal.App.2d 24, 36 [ 278 P.2d 454 ] (Bohn), see also Takahashi v. … hearing”]; Resource Defense Fund v.

Save Panoche Valley v. San Benito County

217 Cal. App. 4th 503 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 2013

(Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553 (Citizens of Goleta Valley).) … (Western States Petroleum Assn. v.

Charpentier v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co.

89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 115 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1999

(Beder v. Cleveland Browns, Inc. (1998) 129 Ohio App.3d 188 [ 717 N.E.2d 716 ].) Beder concerned the Cleveland Browns’ transformation into the Baltimore Ravens in 1996. … Beder disagreed in part with Stern v. Cleveland Browns Football *311 Club, Inc. (Ohio Ct.App„ Dec. 20, 1996, No. 95-L-196) 1996 WL 761163 .

Fresno City High School District v. De Caristo

33 Cal. App. 2d 666 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 12, 1939

Proc. ; Smith, v. State Board of Control, 215 Cal. 421 [ 10 Pac. (2d) 736 ]; County of Los Angeles v. Graves, 210 Cal. 21 [ 290 Pac. 444 ] ; Crowe v. Boyle, 184 Cal. 117 [ 193 Pac. 111 ]; Gill v. Johnson, 103 Cal. … They were neither urged nor considered in such cases as Johnson v. Taft School Dist., 19 Cal. App. (2d) 405 [ 65 Pac. (2d) 912 ], Board of Education v. Jewett, 21 Cal.

In re Mims

203 Cal. App. 4th 478 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 2012

(People v. Sumahit (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 347, 353-354 [ 27 Cal.Rptr.3d 233 ].) … At the subsequent parole hearing conducted in 2009, the Board incorporated by reference our opinion in the direct appeal, People v. Sand-Mims, supra, E001014, of which we have taken judicial notice.

People v. Carter

48 Cal. App. 3d 369 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1975

Geneva Brown. … Geneva Brown and was the same weapon which had been the basis of Carter’s original conviction. He said Mrs. Brown had asked Carter to return the gun to her and that he was doing so at the time of his arrest.

People v. Jenkins

19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 386 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2004

(Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. at pp. 601-602, fn. omitted.) Accordingly, under Brown v. … (Wong Sun v. United States, supra, 371 U.S. at p. 487 ; Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. at p. 603 .)

Butler v. City & County of San Francisco

104 Cal. App. 2d 126 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 1951

Only those powers of the city which are not reserved to the people or delegated to other officials, boards or commissions, are vested in the board of supervisors, to be exercised as provided in the charter.” (Kennedy v. … (See Villain v. Civil Service Com., 18 Cal.2d 851 [ 117 P.2d 880 ]; Shannon v. McKinley, 62 Cal.App.2d 169 [ 144 P.2d 433 ]; Dierssen v. Civil Service Com., 43 Cal.App.2d 53 [ 110 P.2d 513 ].)

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Ryan Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

39 Cal. App. 3d 804 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1974

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (Moyer v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1973) 10 Cal.3d 222, 230 [ 110 Cal.Rptr. 144 , 514 P.2d 1224 ]; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].)

Bd. of Dental Examr's v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 653 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 13, 1998

While a remand order is not appeal-able (see Cobb v. University of So. … (IFS Industries, Inc. v. Stephens (1984) 159 Cal.App.3d 740, 744, 756 [ 205 Cal.Rptr. 915 ].) In Green v.