Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.47s
Illinois Midwest Ins. Agency, LLC v. WCAB/Rodriguez
California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 2025
ADJ11532204) Petitioner, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, Respondents. PROCEEDINGS to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. … The Appeals Board described this court’s summary denial of a petition for review in National Cement Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublished208 Cal. App. 4th 547 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 2012
(O’Keefe v. Kompa (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 130, 134 [ 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 602 ].) … (O’Keefe v. Kompa, supra, 84 Cal.App.4th at p. 134 .) As a member of the board, Feldman’s aim in the derivative litigation should be to obtain a resolution favorable to the Club.
Cited 13 timesPublishedMaxwell Cafe, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
142 Cal. App. 2d 73 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1956
(Mantzoros v. State Board of Equalization, 87 Cal.App.2d 140, 144 [ 196 P.2d 657 ] ; Cornell v. Reilly, 127 Cal.App.2d 178 [ 273 P.2d 572 ].) … Reilly, 125 Cal.App.2d 334 [ 270 P.2d 547 ]; Marcucci v. Board of Equalization, 138 Cal.App.2d 605 [ 292 P.2d 264 ].)
Cited 17 timesPublishedKawasaki Motors Corp. v. Superior Court
101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 863 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 2000
Automotive Management Group, Inc. v. … Citing City of Carmel-by-the-Sea v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 964, 970-971 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 379 ], Saba argues that the board waived its right of appeal. This argument is hardly worthy of a response.
Cited 11 timesPublishedFinnan v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Joaquin
26 Cal. App. 724 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1915
Cited 0 timesPublished38 Cal. App. 2d 405 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1940
Under such circumstances the members of the board are not liable for the tort of a subordinate officer, for the reason that the doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply. In Michel v. … (Van Cleave v. Bucher, 79 Cal. 600 [ 21 Pac. 954 ].)
Cited 13 timesPublished8minutenergy US Manager v. MDS Capital CA1/3
California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2023
(Gueyffier v. … (Connerly v. State Personnel Board (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1169, 1175.)
Cited 0 timesUnpublished36 Cal. App. 4th 843 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 1995
Fred Lopez, who worked at the Contractor’s State License Board, also testified the Riddle contract was a fixed price contract. … (People v.
Cited 73 timesPublishedKaiser Center, Inc. v. County of Alameda
189 Cal. App. 3d 978 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1987
Poods, Inc. v. … (See De Luz Homes, Inc. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedAldrich v. Chino School District
109 Cal. App. 14 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 1930
The board had no power, under the code section above quoted, to accept the resignation as of August 1st (see Armstrong v. … (Higgins v. San Diego, 118 Cal. 524 [ 45 Pac. 824 , 50 Pac. 670 ]; Buck v. City of Eureka, 124 Cal. 61 [ 56 Pac. 612 ] ; Martin v. Fisher et al., 108 Cal. App. 34 [ 291 Pac. 476 ].)
Cited 1 timesPublishedPoverty Resistance Center v. Hart
213 Cal. App. 3d 295 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 18, 1989
If the Board has gone outside these boundaries plaintiffs are entitled to judicial relief. These assessments, with due deference to the Board, ultimately present questions of law for the court. (See Mooney v. … (Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters (1946) 29 Cal.2d 34, 42 [ 172 P.2d 867 ].)” (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 [ 216 Cal.Rptr. 718 , 703 P.2d 58 ].)
Cited 13 timesPublishedAmerican Distilling Co. v. Johnson
132 Cal. App. 2d 73 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1955
The courts take judicial notice *77 of the rules of the board. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1875, subd. 3; Anders v. State Board of Equalization, 82 Cal.App.2d 88, 98 [ 185 P.2d 883 ].) … It has been held in San Francisco Brewing Corp. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHassaine v. Club Demonstration Services, Inc.
California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 2022
(See Mackey v. Board of Trustees of Cal. … (Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021) 11 Cal.5th 204, 213 (Brown).) Because the trial court granted summary judgment on the basis of no duty, it did not reach CDS’s alternative arguments regarding breach and causation.
Cited 0 timesPublished142 Cal. App. 3d 917 · California Court of Appeal · May 11, 1983
(Dillon v. Board of Pension Commrs. (1941) 18 Cal.2d 427 [ 116 P.2d 37 , 136 A.L.R. 800 ]; Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of Education (1963) 59 Cal.2d 382 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 657 , 380 P.2d 97 ].) … (Bollinger v. National Fire Ins. Co. (1944) 25 Cal.2d 399 [ 154 P.2d 399 ]; Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ]; Schneider v.
Cited 143 timesPublished32 Cal. App. 3d 420 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1973
The statute would be void for all purposes. ( Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855 [ 106 Cal. … (See People v. Symons, 54 Cal.2d 855, 859-862 [ 9 Cal. Rptr. 363 , 357 P.2d 451 ]; People v. Ricciardi, 23 Cal.2d 390, 401-402 [ 144 P.2d 799 ]; Bacich v. Board of Control, 23 Cal.2d 343, 349-356 [ 144 P.2d 818 ].)
Cited 11 timesPublished115 Cal. App. 2d 452 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1953
Baer testified further that appellant Jordan wore a brown hat with the brim turned up, a brown suit, and shirt with open collar, and that Petree and Peterson wore sport clothes. … (People v. Harper, 25 Cal.2d 862, 877 [ 156 P.2d 249 ]; People v. Negra, 208 Cal. 64, 69 [ 280 P. 354 ]; People v. Griffin, 98 Cal.App.2d 1, 25 [ 219 P.2d 519 ]; People v.
Cited 6 timesPublished34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 55 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 2005
Dept. of Conservation v. … (Hafer v. Melo, at p. 27.)
Cited 10 timesPublishedEndangered Habitats League, Inc. v. State Water Res. Control Bd.
63 Cal. App. 4th 227 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1997
Another case of interest is Al Larson Boat Shop, Inc. v. Board of Harbor Commissioners (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 729 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.2d 618 ]. … Was Habitat simply to write letters to the individual board members?
Cited 14 timesPublishedTorres v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
192 Cal. App. 2d 541 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1961
(Weiss v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 40 Cal.2d 772, 776 ; Altadena Community Church v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 109 Cal.App.2d 99, 105 .) … (Martin v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. Appeals Board, supra, 52 Cal.2d 238, 248 ; Hansen v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 43 Cal.App.2d 176, 179 .)
Cited 15 timesPublished65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 162 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 7, 2007
(See People v. … The court in Irons v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna