Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.47s

  • Illinois Midwest Ins. Agency, LLC v. WCAB/Rodriguez

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 2025

    ADJ11532204) Petitioner, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, Respondents. PROCEEDINGS to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. … The Appeals Board described this court’s summary denial of a petition for review in National Cement Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Silk v. Feldman

    208 Cal. App. 4th 547 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 2012

    (O’Keefe v. Kompa (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 130, 134 [ 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 602 ].) … (O’Keefe v. Kompa, supra, 84 Cal.App.4th at p. 134 .) As a member of the board, Feldman’s aim in the derivative litigation should be to obtain a resolution favorable to the Club.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Maxwell Cafe, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

    142 Cal. App. 2d 73 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1956

    (Mantzoros v. State Board of Equalization, 87 Cal.App.2d 140, 144 [ 196 P.2d 657 ] ; Cornell v. Reilly, 127 Cal.App.2d 178 [ 273 P.2d 572 ].) … Reilly, 125 Cal.App.2d 334 [ 270 P.2d 547 ]; Marcucci v. Board of Equalization, 138 Cal.App.2d 605 [ 292 P.2d 264 ].)

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. Superior Court

    101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 863 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 2000

    Automotive Management Group, Inc. v. … Citing City of Carmel-by-the-Sea v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 964, 970-971 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 379 ], Saba argues that the board waived its right of appeal. This argument is hardly worthy of a response.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Finnan v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Joaquin

    26 Cal. App. 724 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1915

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reed v. Molony

    38 Cal. App. 2d 405 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1940

    Under such circumstances the members of the board are not liable for the tort of a subordinate officer, for the reason that the doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply. In Michel v. … (Van Cleave v. Bucher, 79 Cal. 600 [ 21 Pac. 954 ].)

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • 8minutenergy US Manager v. MDS Capital CA1/3

    California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2023

    (Gueyffier v. … (Connerly v. State Personnel Board (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1169, 1175.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • People v. Thompson

    36 Cal. App. 4th 843 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 1995

    Fred Lopez, who worked at the Contractor’s State License Board, also testified the Riddle contract was a fixed price contract. … (People v.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Kaiser Center, Inc. v. County of Alameda

    189 Cal. App. 3d 978 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1987

    Poods, Inc. v. … (See De Luz Homes, Inc. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Aldrich v. Chino School District

    109 Cal. App. 14 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 1930

    The board had no power, under the code section above quoted, to accept the resignation as of August 1st (see Armstrong v. … (Higgins v. San Diego, 118 Cal. 524 [ 45 Pac. 824 , 50 Pac. 670 ]; Buck v. City of Eureka, 124 Cal. 61 [ 56 Pac. 612 ] ; Martin v. Fisher et al., 108 Cal. App. 34 [ 291 Pac. 476 ].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Poverty Resistance Center v. Hart

    213 Cal. App. 3d 295 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 18, 1989

    If the Board has gone outside these boundaries plaintiffs are entitled to judicial relief. These assessments, with due deference to the Board, ultimately present questions of law for the court. (See Mooney v. … (Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters (1946) 29 Cal.2d 34, 42 [ 172 P.2d 867 ].)” (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 [ 216 Cal.Rptr. 718 , 703 P.2d 58 ].)

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • American Distilling Co. v. Johnson

    132 Cal. App. 2d 73 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1955

    The courts take judicial notice *77 of the rules of the board. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1875, subd. 3; Anders v. State Board of Equalization, 82 Cal.App.2d 88, 98 [ 185 P.2d 883 ].) … It has been held in San Francisco Brewing Corp. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hassaine v. Club Demonstration Services, Inc.

    California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 2022

    (See Mackey v. Board of Trustees of Cal. … (Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021) 11 Cal.5th 204, 213 (Brown).) Because the trial court granted summary judgment on the basis of no duty, it did not reach CDS’s alternative arguments regarding breach and causation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Collier v. City of Pasadena

    142 Cal. App. 3d 917 · California Court of Appeal · May 11, 1983

    (Dillon v. Board of Pension Commrs. (1941) 18 Cal.2d 427 [ 116 P.2d 37 , 136 A.L.R. 800 ]; Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of Education (1963) 59 Cal.2d 382 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 657 , 380 P.2d 97 ].) … (Bollinger v. National Fire Ins. Co. (1944) 25 Cal.2d 399 [ 154 P.2d 399 ]; Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ]; Schneider v.

    Cited 143 timesPublished
  • Parking Authority v. Nicovich

    32 Cal. App. 3d 420 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1973

    The statute would be void for all purposes. ( Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855 [ 106 Cal. … (See People v. Symons, 54 Cal.2d 855, 859-862 [ 9 Cal. Rptr. 363 , 357 P.2d 451 ]; People v. Ricciardi, 23 Cal.2d 390, 401-402 [ 144 P.2d 799 ]; Bacich v. Board of Control, 23 Cal.2d 343, 349-356 [ 144 P.2d 818 ].)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Jordan

    115 Cal. App. 2d 452 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1953

    Baer testified further that appellant Jordan wore a brown hat with the brim turned up, a brown suit, and shirt with open collar, and that Petree and Peterson wore sport clothes. … (People v. Harper, 25 Cal.2d 862, 877 [ 156 P.2d 249 ]; People v. Negra, 208 Cal. 64, 69 [ 280 P. 354 ]; People v. Griffin, 98 Cal.App.2d 1, 25 [ 219 P.2d 519 ]; People v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • BRUNIUS v. Parrish

    34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 55 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 2005

    Dept. of Conservation v. … (Hafer v. Melo, at p. 27.)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. State Water Res. Control Bd.

    63 Cal. App. 4th 227 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1997

    Another case of interest is Al Larson Boat Shop, Inc. v. Board of Harbor Commissioners (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 729 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.2d 618 ]. … Was Habitat simply to write letters to the individual board members?

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Torres v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

    192 Cal. App. 2d 541 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1961

    (Weiss v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 40 Cal.2d 772, 776 ; Altadena Community Church v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 109 Cal.App.2d 99, 105 .) … (Martin v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. Appeals Board, supra, 52 Cal.2d 238, 248 ; Hansen v. State Board of Equalization, supra, 43 Cal.App.2d 176, 179 .)

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In Re Hyde

    65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 162 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 7, 2007

    (See People v. … The court in Irons v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.