Case law

Kupka v. Board of Administration

122 Cal. App. 3d 791 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 1981

Rptr. 214 GERALD KUPKA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 23711. … Co. v. City of Santa Cruz (1961) 198 Cal. App.2d 267, 273 [ 3 Cal. Rptr. 706 ]; Rombotis v. Fink (1948) 89 Cal. App.2d 378, 386, 391 [ 201 P.2d 588 ]; Day v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (1936) 11 Cal.

Boyll v. State Personnel Board

146 Cal. App. 3d 1070 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1983

People v. Ward (1901) 134 Cal. 301 [ 66 P. 372 ]; People v. Clapp (1944) 67 Cal.App.2d 197 [ 153 P.2d 758 ], with People v. Treadwell (1885) 66 Cal. 400 [ 5 P. 686 ]; Truchon v. … In Carter v.

Jackson v. Board of Education

250 Cal. App. 2d 856 · California Court of Appeal · May 10, 1967

(Ward v. San Diego School Dist., 203 Cal. 712, 715-716 [ 265 P. 821 ] [members of the school board held not to be city officers] ; Esberg v. … Badaracco, 202 Cal. 110, 118-119 [ 259 P. 730 ] [city and county had no discretion to revise budget prepared by board of education] ; Kennedy v.

Hepner v. Franchise Tax Board

52 Cal. App. 4th 1475 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1997

(the Board). … (Greene v. Franchise Tax Bd., supra, 27 Cal.App.3d at p. 42 .)

Ratto v. Board of Trustees

75 Cal. App. 724 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1925

of said Board of Trustees, shall be recalled. … App. 754 [ 168 Pac. 1058 ]; Williams v. Gill, 65 Cal. App. 129 [ 223 Pac. 559 ]; Chester v.

Franchise Tax Board v. Cory

80 Cal. App. 3d 772 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1978

Committee v. Brown (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 879 , 888 and fn. 11 [ 125 Cal.Rptr. 915 ].) … The Controller then advised the Franchise Tax Board on September 21, 1977, that because of the possibility of personal liability under Stanson v.

Burgess v. Board of Education

41 Cal. App. 3d 571 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 1974

In People v. … Strumsky v.

Fenske v. Board of Administration

103 Cal. App. 3d 590 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1980

Board of Police etc. Commrs. (1948) 32 Cal.2d 666, 671 [ 197 P.2d 710 ]; see also Dickey v. Retirement Board (1976) 16 Cal.3d 745, 750 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 289 , 548 P.2d 689 ].) … (Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby (1971) 5 Cal.3d 1, 20 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 329 , 485 P.2d 529 , 46 A.L.R.3d 351 ]; see also Hardy v. Stumpf (1978) 21 Cal.3d 1, 7 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 176 , 576 P.2d 1342 ], and D'Amico v.

Board of Education v. Weiland

179 Cal. App. 2d 808 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1960

As said in Goldsmith v. Board of Education, 66 Cal.App. 157, 168 [ 225 P. 783] : . … Dist. v. De Caristo, 33 Cal.App.2d 666 [ 92 P.2d 668 ]. The same contention was made in Board of Education v. Swan, 41 Cal.2d 546 [ 261 P.2d 261 ], and found to be without merit.

Board of Administration v. Ames

215 Cal. App. 2d 215 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1963

Fund v. … (See Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners, 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; City of Walnut Creek v.

Steiger v. Board of Supervisors

143 Cal. App. 2d 352 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1956

Retirement Board, 13 Cal.App.2d 676, 677 [ 57 P.2d 520 ]).” (Wheeler v. Gregg, 90 Cal.App.2d 348, 361 [ 203 P.2d 37 ] ; Bradbeer v. … (Meyers v. Board of Supervisors, 110 Cal.App.2d 623, 628 [ 243 P.2d 38 ].)

Brown v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

51 Cal. App. 65 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 1921

The facts relied upon to maintain this action are identical with those related in Brown v. Rives, 42 Cal. App. 482 , [ 184 Pac. 32 ], There the action was brought by this plaintiff against the notary public, B. B. … (Brown v. Rives, supra.)

Gordon v. Board of Education

78 Cal. App. 2d 464 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1947

Brown (1925), 125 Misc. 692 [ 211 N.Y.S. 822 ], the trial court of Westchester County, New York, held that the furnishing of cards for a released-time plan of religious education by the Board of Education violated constitutional … Latimer v. Board of Education, supra. In discussing the use of public funds in aid of the plan as applied in this case, the court observes: “In the case of Nichols v.

Peterson v. Board of Supervisors

93 Cal. App. 490 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1928

To the same effect appellant cites the case of Hayes v. County of Los Angeles, 99 Cal. 76 [ 33 Pac. 766 ], and Matter of Application of Cencinino, 31 Cal. App. 238 [ 160 Pac. 167 ], to the same effect. … Such was apparently the meaning placed upon section 4029 of the Political Code by the supreme court of this state in the case of Harnett v. County of Sacramento, 195 Cal. 676 [ 235 Pac. 445 ].

Ladd v. Board of Trustees

23 Cal. App. 3d 984 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 3, 1972

In Thornton v. … In Taylor v.

Goodwin v. Board of Trustees

72 Cal. App. 2d 445 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 2, 1946

shall have all such sums as have been deducted from his pay and contributed to the Firemen’s Belief and Pension Fund pursuant to the provisions of Section 97b, refunded to him plus simple interest at the rate fixed by the Board … (Whitehead v. Davie, 189 Cal. 715 [ 209 P. 1008 ].)

McClure v. Board of Education

38 Cal. App. 500 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 1918

The court concluded that such use was within the spirit and intent of said provisions. *506 The decision in Lagow v. Hill, 238 Ill. 428 , [ 87 N. … We may leave the citations with the case of Lewis v.

Pepper v. Board of Directors

162 Cal. App. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1958

Bank v. Roberts, 16 Cal.2d 800, 805 [ 108 P.2d 439 ]; In re Miller, 31 Cal.2d 191, 199 [ 187 P.2d 722 ]; Kirkwood v. … (In re Halcomb, 21 Cal.2d 126, 130 [ 130 P.2d 384 ]; Klassen v. City of San Carlos, 149 Cal.App.2d 225, 228 [ 308 P.2d 413 ]; People v. Trout, 137 Cal.App.2d 794 [291 P.2d 83]; Cavalli v.

Pereyda v. State Personnel Board

15 Cal. App. 3d 47 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1971

All reasonable inferences must be drawn in support of the findings of the Board (Hingsbergen v. State Personnel Bd. (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 914 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 59 ]; Neely v. … In People v.

Hilton v. Board of Supervisors

7 Cal. App. 3d 708 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1970

(See Johnston v. City of Claremont, 49 Cal.2d 826, 834 [ 323 P.2d 71 ]; Tandy v. City of Oakland, 208 Cal.App.2d 609, 611 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 429 ]; Ferris v. … (De Luca v. Board of Supervisors, 134 Cal.App.2d 606, 609-610 [ 286 P.2d 395 ].)