Case law

Preciado v. County of Ventura

143 Cal. App. 3d 783 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1982

(Jackson v. City of Sacramento (1981) 117 Cal.App.3d 596, 601-602 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 826 ]; Summerford v. Board of Retirement (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 128, 131 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 814 ].) … (Summerford v. Board of Retirement, supra, 72 Cal.App.3d at p. 132 ; Flaherty v. Board of Retirement (1961) 198 Cal.App.2d 397, 404 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 256 ].)

Hickman-Coleman Co. v. Leggett

10 Cal. App. 29 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1909

(McKee v. Hunt, 142 Cal. 526 , [ 77 Pac. 1103 ]; Estate of Scott, 1 Cal. App. 742 , [ 83 Pac. 85 ]; Maxon v. Jones, 128 Cal. 77 , [ 60 Pac. 516 ]; Sterritt v. Barker, 119 Cal. 495 , [ 51 Pac. 695 ]; Briggs v. … Brown, who was both able and willing to complete said purchase.

Wells Fargo Bank v. Ricker

269 Cal. App. 2d 526 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1969

(See United States v. du Pont & Co., 353 U.S. 586 [ 1 L.Ed.2d 1057 , 77 S.Ct. 872 ]; United States v. du Pont & Co., 366 U.S. 316, 334 [ 6 L.Ed. 2d 318, 330 , 81 S.Ct. 1243 ]; United States v. du Pont, Final Judgment Action … (See People v. White, 85 Cal.App. 241, 254 [ 259 P. 76 ], citing 18 C.J..1406.)

In Re Aguilar

168 Cal. App. 4th 1479 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 2008

The Governor’s power to review a decision of the Board is set forth in article V, section 8, subdivision (b) of the California Constitution. 7 “Article V, section 8(b), requires that a parole decision by the Governor pursuant … V, § 8, subd. (b).) 8 A petition for habeas corpus in this court is an original proceeding. (Durdines v.

People v. Pera

36 Cal. App. 292 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1918

The attorney-general, in a petition for a rehearing of this case, has called our attention to two cases, People v. Brown, 113 Cal. 35 , [ 45 Pac. 181 ], and People v. Kerr, 15 Cal. … Code, sec. 1206; People v. Brown, 113 Cal. 35 , [ 45 Pac. 181 ].)

Jensen v. Superior Court

154 Cal. App. 3d 533 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1984

The stay in Johnson, et al. v. Short, et al., San Diego Superior Court Case No. 491737 is lifted. Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied May 2, 1984. … & Company, p. 98.) 5 People v.

Weinberg v. Superior Court

21 Cal. App. 3d 1018 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1971

(People v. Marshall, 69 Cal.2d 51, 56 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 585 , 442 P.2d 665 ]; People v. Gilbert, 63 Cal.2d 690, 707 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 909 , 408 P.2d 365 ]; People v. Roberts, 47 Cal.2d 374, 379 [ 303 P.2d 721 ]; People v. … The following discussion sharply defines the distinction between People v. Superior Court, supra, 275 Cal.App.2d 489 , and the instant case. “In Oliver [v.

People v. Gates

41 Cal. App. 3d 590 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 5, 1974

DeWitt v. Board of Supervisors, 53 Cal.2d 419, 424 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 348 P.2d 567 ]; Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. Offner, 86 Cal.App.2d 92 [ 194 P.2d 33 ].) The principle above applies to the situation involved here. … In City of Los Angeles v.

Lusk v. Compton City Sch. Bd. of Educ.

252 Cal. App. 2d 376 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 6, 1967

Many of the plaintiffs joined in an appeal from the judgment, We are unable to distinguish this case, at its crucial point, from Gogerty v. … Assuming that the amended complaint may be considered embellished by the addition of these two letters, judicially noticed (see Stanton v.

Brock v. Superior Court

109 Cal. App. 2d 594 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 1952

(See Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., 100 Cal.App. 270 [ 279 P. 1080 ] ; Hogan v. Retirement Board, 13 Cal.App.2d 676 [ 57 P.2d 520 ]; and Murphy v. Retirement Board; 49 Cal.App.2d 58 [ 121 P.2d 101 ].) In Ray v. … J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred. * Laisne v. State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ]; Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal.2d 790 [ 136 P.2d 304 ]; Moran v.

Alta Loma School District v. San Bernardino County Committee on School District Reorganization

124 Cal. App. 3d 542 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 14, 1981

{DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 174 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ].) … An exception, of course, appears when the administrative board is without jurisdiction.” {Id., at p. 717; see, e.g., Long Island Rail Road Company v.

City of Fresno v. Superior Court

188 Cal. App. 3d 1484 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1987

(Miller v. United Airlines, Inc. (1985) 174 Cal.App.3d 878, 890 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 684 ]; Wilkinson v. Norcal Mutual Ins. Co. (1979) 98 Cal.App.3d 307, 318 [ 159 Cal.Rptr. 416 ].) … Additionally, Santos argues Logan v. Southern Cal.

Manguso v. Oceanside Unified School District

88 Cal. App. 3d 725 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1979

In Seelenfreund v. … The district also points to Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. (W.D.Mo. 1963) 212 F.Supp. 832 ; affd. (8th Cir. 1963) 323 F.2d 420 as a case factually similar to the case at bar.

Paul Blanco's Good Car Co. Auto Group v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 2020

Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. … (Davcon, Inc. v.

Green v. Superior Court

220 Cal. App. 2d 121 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1963

Proc., § 1068; State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.2d 467, 471 [ 127 P.2d 4 ].) … (Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R.R. Co. (1877) 66 Mo. 588 ; Deutschmann v. Third Ave. R. Co., 87 App.Div. 503 [ 84 N.Y.S. 887 ].) In the latter case the court says (on p. 894 [84 N.Y.S.]) : “ ...

Crabtree v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.

33 Cal. App. 2d 35 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1939

Co. v. Purucker, (Ohio) 244 U. S. 320 [37 Sup. Ct. 629, 61 L. Ed. 1166 ]; Montgomery v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 22 Fed. (2d) 359; Chapman v. United States Express Co., 192 Mich. 654 [ 159 N. W. 308 ].) … Co. v. Hall, 232 U. S. 94 [34 Sup. Ct. 229, 58 L.

In Re Gaul

170 Cal. App. 4th 20 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 2009

V, § 8, subd. (b); Pen. … (People v.

Jackson v. City of Sacramento

117 Cal. App. 3d 596 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1981

Thus, the standards set by each board are markedly different. … In Greatorex v.

Desmond v. County of Contra Costa

21 Cal. App. 4th 330 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1993

(b), 459; Longshore v. … (Guinnane v.

In Re Marriage of Donnelly

142 Cal. App. 3d 135 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1983

Co. v. Bank of Italy (1923) 60 Cal.App. 602 [ 214 P. 61 ].) … (Biltoft v. Wootten (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 58, 60-62 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 581 ].)