Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

2.41s

  • McNeill v. McCann CA4/1

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 2014

    (Brown v. … (Id. at pp. 44-49; accord, Reynolds v. Bement (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1075, 1089-1090, abrogated on other grounds in Martinez v. Combs (2010) 49 Cal.4th 35, 62-66.) Subsequently, in Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • County of Los Angeles v. Commission on State Mandates

    58 Cal. Rptr. 3d 762 · California Court of Appeal · May 10, 2007

    (San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 574 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ].) … (United Farm Workers of America v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 347, 350 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 437 ]; Tielsch v. City of Anaheim (1984) 160 Cal.App.3d 576, 578 [ 206 Cal.Rptr. 740 ]; Donnellan v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • People v. Miller

    19 Cal. App. 2d 708 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1937

    (See, also, People v. Farrington, 140 Cal. 656 [74 Pac. 288]; People v. Clark, 2 Cal. App. (2d) 743 [ 38 Pac. (2d) 796 ]; People v. Zabriski, 135 Cal. App. 169 [26 Pac. (2d) 511]; People v. Peccole, 92 Cal. … (People v. Green, 93 Cal. App. 435 [ 269 Pac. 687 ], and cases there cited; People v. Oakleaf, 66 Cal. App. 314 [ 226 Pac. 24 ] ; People v. Miller, 139 Cal. App. 644 [ 34 Pac. (2d) 788 ] ; People v. Dunlap, 12 Cal.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. California Employment Stabilization Commission

    71 Cal. App. 2d 107 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1945

    In reaching our determination that this matter must be remanded, we are strongly influenced by the case of Eagadone v. … Com. v. Butte Co. etc. Assn., 25 Cal.2d 624 [ 154 P.2d 892 ]; Matson Terminals Inc. v. California Emp. Com., 24 Cal.2d 695 [ 151 P.2d 202 ]; California Emp. Com. v. Los Angeles etc.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Diamond International Corp. v. Boas

    92 Cal. App. 3d 1015 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1979

    McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, David M. Balabanian, James L. Hunt and Donn P. Pickett for Plaintiff and Respondent. … Ashe v. Zemansky was not the only litigation in which the powers of the board of election commissioners were considered.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Fish & Game Commission

    75 Cal. App. 764 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1925

    Board of Supervisors, 162 Cal. 14 [ 120 Pac. 780 ]; Suckow v. Alderson, 182 Cal. 250 [ 187 Pac. 965 ]; Brecheen v. Riley, 187 Cal. 121 [ 200 Pac. 1042 ]; Gregory v. Hecke, 73 Cal. App. 268 [ 238 Pac. 787, 793 ].) … The cases of Imperial Water Co. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly

    29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 462 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 2005

    (Parker v. Brown, supra, 317 U.S. at p. 360 [ 87 L.Ed. at p. 331 ].) … (Parker v. Brown, supra, 317 U.S. 341 [ 87 L.Ed. 315 ].)

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Newport-Mesa Unified School District v. Hubert

    132 Cal. App. 3d 724 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 1982

    (Board of Ed. v. Conn. State Bd. of Ed. (1980) 179 Conn. 694 [ 427 A.2d 846 ]; Krawitz v. Com., Dept. of Ed. (1979) 48 Pa.Commw.Ct. 155 [ 408 A.2d 1202 ]; Amherst-Pelham Reg. School v. … (Cox v. Brown (D.D.C. 1980) 498 F.Supp. 823 (preliminary injunction granted placing children in private schools); Frankel v. Commissioner of Ed. (S.D.N.Y. 1979) 480 F.Supp. 1156 (§ 1415(e)(3) not in issue); Boxall v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Maywood Glass Co. v. Stewart

    170 Cal. App. 2d 719 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1959

    (Moran v. … In Boynton Cab Co. v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Cox v. First National Bank

    10 Cal. App. 2d 302 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1935

    (Copeland v. Melrose National Bank of New York, 229 App. Div. 311 [ 241 N. Y. Supp. 429 ] ; First National Bank of Colquitt v. Miller, 23 Ga. App. 441 [ 98 S. E. 402 ] ; Van Slyke v. Andrews, 146 Minn. 316 [ 178 N. … R. 1068] ; Rankin v. Tygard, 198 Fed. 795 .)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Callahan v. City & County of San Francisco

    68 Cal. App. 2d 286 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 1945

    As said in the cases of County of Los Angeles v. Lamb, 61 Cal. 196 , and Williams v. … Co. v. San Bernardino, 100 Cal. 348 [ 34 P. 819 ].) Their interpretation must be based on the language used.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Byers v. Cathcart

    57 Cal. App. 4th 805 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 1997

    (b); Smith v. Silvey (1983) 149 Cal.App.3d 400 [ 197 Cal.Rptr. 15 ].) … (See Morcos v. Board of Retirement (1990) 51 Cal.3d 924, 927 [ 275 Cal.Rptr. 187 , 800 P.2d 543 ].)

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Committee to Save Beverly Highlands Homes Ass'n v. Beverly Highlands Homes Ass'n

    112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 732 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 2001

    (Concerned Citizens of Palm Desert, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 257, 265 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 328 ].) … People v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Kruss v. Booth

    185 Cal. App. 4th 699 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 2010

    Co. v. … Brown v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Oldham v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

    85 Cal. App. 2d 214 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1948

    (Mayes v. Splitdorf Electrical Co., 94 N.J.L. 460 [ 111 A. 10 ].” (See, also, Hinds v. Wheadon, 19 Cal.2d 458, 460 [ 121 P.2d 724 ]; Edwards v. Hollywood Canteen, 27 Cal.2d 802, 809 [ 167 P.2d 729 ]; Rest. … The rule is stated in Hatfield v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Vedanta Society of Southern California v. California Quartet Ltd.

    100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 889 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 2000

    Kleist v. … (City of Carmel-by-the-Sea v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 71 Cal.App.3d at p. 95 .)

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • People v. Nagel

    17 Cal. App. 3d 492 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1971

    (See People v. Dukes, 1 Cal.App.3d 913, 916 [82 Cal.Rptr, 218].) Officer Brown testified that he intended to take defendant to Hollywood station where an officer was available to accept bail. … In Virgil v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Monson v. Fischer

    118 Cal. App. 503 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1931

    (Brown v. Aguilar, 202 Cal. 143 [ 259 Pac. 735 ].) … The parties are presumed to have had the law in view in making their contract (Brown v. Kling, 101 Cal. 295 [ 35 Pac. 995 ]; Maguire v. Reardon, 41 Cal.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Save Our Students-Safety etc. v. County of San Diego CA4/1

    California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 2022

    (Citizens for Amending Proposition L v. City of Pomona (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 1159, 1178-1179; Kaczorowski v. Mendocino County Board of Supervisors (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 564, 568.) … (Royalty, supra, 125 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1121, 1123; Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 830, 847 (Board of Supervisors).)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Heilig v. Superior Court

    149 Cal. App. 3d 978 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1983

    In Abbott Power Corp. v. … (Abbott Power Corp. v. Overhead Electric Co., supra, 60 Cal.App.3d at pp. 281-282.) In Schlussel v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.