Case law

Mohilef v. Janovici

51 Cal. App. 4th 267 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1996

(See Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) 408 U.S. 564, 571 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 557 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 ]; Traverso v. People ex rel. … (Chongris v. Board of Appeals of Town of Andover (1st Cir. 1987) 811 F.2d 36, 41-42 ].)

Imp. Irrig. Dist. v. St. Wat. Resources Ctrl.

225 Cal. App. 3d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1990

In Mandel v. … In Sklar v. Franchise Tax Board (1986) 185 Cal. App.3d 616 [ 230 Cal.

Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Bradbury

183 Cal. App. 2d 40 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1960

City of Los Angeles, 10 Cal.App.2d 407, 412 [ 52 P.2d 545]; Wood v. Board of Police & Fire Pension Commrs., 49 Cal.App.2d 52 [ 120 P.2d 898 ] ; Stewart v. McCollister, 37 Cal.2d 203 [ 231 P.2d 48 ] ; Musto-Kennan Co. v. … In Brill v.

Beeson v. City of Los Angeles

115 Cal. App. 122 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1931

(Farmers & Merchants’ Bank v. Los Angeles, 151 Cal. 655 [ 91 Pac. 795 ].) ’ (Gei mann v. Board of Police Commrs., 158 Cal. 748 [ 112 Pac. 553 ].) … Co. v. Los Angeles, 207 Cal. 430 [ 270 Pac. 1028 ], and Spencer v.

Devlin v. Donnelly

20 Cal. App. 495 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1912

The board of supervisors has completed its canvass and the result has been duly certified to the secretary of state. In the Los Angeles case the court followed the decision in Rice v. … Prom Rice v.

Maywood Glass Co. v. Stewart

170 Cal. App. 2d 719 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1959

(Moran v. … In Boynton Cab Co. v.

Katz v. Chevron Corp.

22 Cal. App. 4th 1352 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1994

In Morse v. … In Will v.

McPherson v. Richards

134 Cal. App. 462 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1933

Justice Shaw, in the case of Jones v. De Shields, 187. … In support of this declaration of law, the case of Pimental v. San Francisco, 21 Cal. 351 , is cited.

San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

28 Cal. App. 3d 556 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1972

and since 1969, he has remained on the board of directors and served as chairman of the executive committee. … In Jones v. Brown, 13 Cal.App.3d 513, 519 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 651 ], the court stated: “We observe further that the valid waiver of a right presupposes an actual and demonstrable knowledge of the very right being waived.”

People v. Bernal

174 Cal. App. 2d 777 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1959

There they found hidden behind a packing box in the garage nearest defendant’s home a metal can with a brown paper-wrapped marijuana cigarette contained therein. … (People v. Brown, 147 Cal.App.2d 352 [ 305 P.2d 126 ]; People v. Boyles, 45 Cal.2d 652, 655 [ 290 P.2d 535 ]; People v. Martin, 45 Cal.2d 755, 762 [ 290 P.2d 855 ]; People v.

People v. Silverstein

52 Cal. App. 2d 725 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1942

(United States v. Marrin, 227 Fed. 314 .) … The United States could waive its right to the custody of the prisoner (Cato v.

Union Trust Co. v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

31 Cal. App. 64 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1916

Our attention has not been called by the appellant to any case in this or other jurisdictions declaring a different rule to that invoked in the case of Brown v. … We think the foregoing embodies a correct statement of the principle declared in the case of Brown v. San Francisco Gaslight Co., 58 Cal. 426 , and that the cases of Murphy v. Crouse, 135 Cal. 14 , [ 87 Am. St.

In Re Marriage of Verlinde

189 Cal. App. 3d 918 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1987

In this case, the trial court relied on Phillipson v. Board of Administration (1970) 3 Cal.3d 32 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ], to cash out each pension plan’s community interest. … Wife relies on Arizona Governing Committee v. Norris (1983) 463 U.S. 1073 [ 77 L.Ed.2d 1236 , 103 S.Ct. 3492 ]. Her reliance is misplaced.

Neighborhood Action Group v. County of Calaveras

156 Cal. App. 3d 1176 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 8, 1984

(Van Sicklen v. Browne (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 122, 126 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 786 ].) With this context in mind we consider the first question presented. B. … (Compare Camp v. Board of Supervisors (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 334, 358-359 [ 176 Cal.Rptr. 620 ].)

People v. Hickey

16 Cal. App. 2d 726 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1936

(Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 [ 147 Pac. 1168 ].) … (Brown v. Brown, supra; Metropolis etc. Sav. Bank v. Barnet, 165 Cal. 449 [ 132 Pac. 833 ].)

People ex rel. Department of Public Works v. Brusati

223 Cal. App. 2d 643 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1963

Brown, the Chief Planner of the City of Los Angeles, and there is no such title as 'Chief Planner. ’ ’ ’ The statements of appellants relative to what Mr. Salinas and Mr. Brown told Mr. … (See Perry v. Fowler, 102 Cal.App.2d 808, 811 [ 229 P.2d 46 ]; Henningsen v. Howard, 117 Cal.App.2d 352, 355 [ 255 P.2d 837 ].)

People v. Soojian

190 Cal. App. 4th 491 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 2010

Bolin for completion.” v. Declaration of Paul Herrmann Herrmann is a board certified forensic pathologist. He reviewed the relevant trial testimony. … Haddix Haddix is a board certified forensic pathologist who also reviewed the relevant testimony.

People v. Ortiz

147 Cal. App. 2d 248 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1956

Similar views were recently expressly by our Supreme Court in People v. … In support of this principle the court cited Love v.

Save the Welwood Murray Memorial Library Committee v. City Council

215 Cal. App. 3d 1003 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 1989

(See ibid.; see also Pughe v. … See also Stanson v.

Corcoran v. CONTRA COSTA CTY. EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BD.

60 Cal. App. 4th 89 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1997

(Soto v. State of California (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 196, 199 [ 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 11 ].) Our review of a summary judgment determination reviews a matter of law which we approach de novo. (Stratton v. First Nat. Life Ins. … (Lungren v. Deukmejian (1988) 45 Cal.3d 727, 735 [ 248 Cal.Rptr. 115 , 755 P.2d 299 ].)