Case law

In re Woodham

95 Cal. App. 4th 438 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 2001

(Winikow v. … (See also Seykora v.

Goytino v. McAleer

4 Cal. App. 655 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1906

(People v. Grant, 126 N. Y. 476 , [ 27 N. E. 967 ].) The ordinance under consideration does not undertake to declare the keeping of a pool-table a nuisance. … A judgment in the proceedings in the superior court, when final, could be pleaded in bar of this action as a prior adjudication (McCormick v.

Haigh v. City of Los Angeles

139 Cal. App. 595 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1934

Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 92 Cal. … Co. v.

In Re Bush

74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 2008

In Arcadia Unified School Dist. v. … (See Jenkins v. County of Riverside (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 593, 621 [ 41 Cal.Rptr.3d 686 ]; People v.

State Water Resources Control Bd. v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 2025

(See Cohen v. … (Western Oil & Gas Assn. v. Air Resources Board (1984) 37 Cal.3d 502, 509.)

State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 448 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1998

The question of delay and the reasonableness of the cause therefor shall be determined by the appeals board in accordance with the facts.” … In Hale v.

Riverside Sheriffs'assn. v. Bd. of Admin., Cal. Pub. Empl's'ret. Syst.

184 Cal. App. 4th 1 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2010

(Tuolumne County Deputy Sheriffs’ Assn. v. Board of Administration (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1236, 1238 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 824 ] (Tuolumne).) … (Crumpler v. Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567, 577 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 293 ] (Crumpler).)

Wittmann v. Whittingham

85 Cal. App. 140 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 1927

In Brown v. … (See, also, Erkenbrecher v. Grant, 187 Cal. 7 [ 200 Pac. 641 ]; Wenban Estate, Inc., v. Hewlett, 193 Cal. 675 [ 227 Pac. 723 ] ; Shorb v. Beaudry, 56 Cal. 450 ; Demming v. Maas, 18 Cal.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior Court

12 Cal. App. 4th 579 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1993

Rptr. 236 ]; Brown v. Superior Court (1985) 168 Cal. App.3d 489, 496-502 [ 214 Cal. Rptr. 266 ]; Mt. Diablo Hospital Medical Center v. Superior Court (1984) 158 Cal. App.3d 344 [ 204 Cal. … Rptr. 90 , 364 P.2d 266 ]; County of San Diego v. Superior Court (1986) 176 Cal. App.3d 1009, 1022 [ 222 Cal. Rptr. 484 ]; Board of Trustees v. Superior Court (1981) 119 Cal. App.3d 516, 524-526 [ 174 Cal. Rptr. 160 ].)

Save Lafayette Trees v. East Bay Regional Park Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2021

(See Walton v. … Brown; East Bay Regional Park District, Carol R. Victor and Rachel B. Sater, for Defendant and Respondent. SF North Bay Law, Sheryl L.

H.N. & Frances C. Berger Foundation v. City of Escondido

127 Cal. App. 4th 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 2005

In Yee v. … (Galland v. City of Clovis, supra, 24 Cal.4th at p. 1024 .) As the court explained in Kavanau v.

Engineers & Architects Ass'n v. Community Development Department

30 Cal. App. 4th 644 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1994

The City of Los Angeles Employee Relations Board sent a list of seven arbitrators to the Department and the Association. … In Fire Fighters Union v.

Foster v. Superior Court

107 Cal. App. 3d 218 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1980

Brown: Pardon me? The Court: Do you have anything to say to the matter of relevance? Mr. Brown: No, Your Honor. The Court: Sustained. Q. (By Mr. Brown): What were you there for? Mr. Baldwin: Objection, irrelevant. … People v. Woolman (1974) 40 Cal.App.3d 652, 655 [ 115 Cal.Rptr. 324 ]; State v. Brown (1975) 132 N.J.Super. 584 [ 334 A.2d 392, 394 ].)

Rapolla v. Goulart

105 Cal. App. 417 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1930

As said in the case of Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 39 Cal. App. 738 [ 179 Pac. 697, 698 ]: “Under the recent case of McWhirter v. Fuller, 35 Cal. … Co. v.

Sepulveda v. Apablasa

25 Cal. App. 2d 381 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1938

As is said in Scott v. Woodworth, 34 Cal. … (McMillan v. Richards, 9 Cal. 365, 410 [ 70 Am. Dec. 655 ] ; Fogarty v. Sawyer, 17 Cal. 589 .)”

London v. DRI-HONING CORP.

12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 240 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 2004

For this *1009 reason, Weil & Brown’s advice is sage advice. (Weil & Brown, supra, f 8:865 , p. 8E-108.) … In Ghanooni v.

City and County of San Francisco v. State

27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 722 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2005

The Fund also cited the “active support of Proposition 22” by its board *1035 members and individual contributors as evidence of its interest in the litigation. Three of these board members, Senator William J. … Brown (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 879, 891 [ 125 Cal.Rptr. 915 ] (Socialist Workers).)

Save Our Carmel River v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management District

46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 387 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 2006

(Davidon Homes v. … Board of Directors (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 1136, 1143 [ 249 Cal.Rptr. 439 ], disapproved on another point in Western States Petroleum Assn. v.

Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. State Water Res. Control Bd.

63 Cal. App. 4th 227 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1997

Another case of interest is Al Larson Boat Shop, Inc. v. Board of Harbor Commissioners (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 729 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.2d 618 ]. … Was Habitat simply to write letters to the individual board members?

Santee v. Santa Clara County Office of Education

220 Cal. App. 3d 702 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1990

(Jackson v. Board of Education (1967) 250 Cal.App.2d 856, 860 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 763 ] [service of claim on city insufficient where correct public entity was city board of education]; cf. Jamison v. … Board of Education, supra, 250 Cal.App.2d at pp. 858-860; cf. City of San Jose v. Superior Court, supra, 12 Cal.3d at pp. 456-457.) Appellants’ reliance on Bettencourt v.