Case law

Southern California Telephone Co. v. County of Los Angeles

45 Cal. App. 2d 111 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1941

Co. v. … In Hannon v.

DeYoung v. Commission on Professional Competence of the Hueneme Elementary School District

228 Cal. App. 4th 568 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 2014

He contends Pennel v. Pond Union School Dist. (1973) 29 Cal.App.3d 832, 839, and Governing Board v. … In Governing Board v.

California Public Records Research, Inc. v. County of Stanislaus

246 Cal. App. 4th 1432 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 2016

(Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 442.) … In Turnbull & Turnbull v.

Gaumer v. County of Tehama

247 Cal. App. 2d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 1967

Board of Trustee, 165 Cal. 298, 300-301 [ 131 P. 859]; see also Birch v. … Since that time had expired, it was also then beyond the power of the board of supervisors to sit as a board of equalization. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 1603 (as it then read); Birch v.

Willis v. Prime Healthcare Services, Inc.

231 Cal. App. 4th 615 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 2014

(Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown (2012) 565 U.S. __, __ [132 S.Ct. 1201, 1203-1204]; see Mave Enterprises, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 1408, 1428 & fn. 6.) … While the individual contracts were in effect, the union filed a petition for certification as a bargaining representative with the National Labor Relations Board (the board). (Ibid.)

People v. Keith

52 Cal. App. 3d 947 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1975

Frederick Brown, a liquor store owner who knew defendant as a customer, observed defendant and another man in the Tai Ping Restaurant at about 11 p.m. They walked past the table at which Brown and his wife were seated. … Relying on People v.

Thorning v. Hollister School District

11 Cal. App. 4th 1598 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1992

School board members are state officers. (People v. Elliott (1953) 115 Cal.App.2d 410, 415 [ 252 P.2d 661 ].) … However, “in Betts v.

Dierssen v. Civil Service Commission

43 Cal. App. 2d 53 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1941

Board of Police Commrs., 30 Cal. App. (2d) 211 [ 86 Pac. (2d) 118 ].) It is true that in Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 6 Cal. (2d) 557 [ 59 Pac. (2d) 119 ], and Drummey v. … (French v. Cook, 173 Cal. 126 [ 160 Pac. 411 ] ; Sheehan v. Board of Police Commrs., 197 Cal. 70 [ 239 Pac. 844 ] ; Sheehan v. Board of Police Commrs., 47 Cal. App. 29 [ 190 Pac. 51 ].)

Santee v. Santa Clara County Office of Education

220 Cal. App. 3d 702 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1990

(Jackson v. Board of Education (1967) 250 Cal.App.2d 856, 860 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 763 ] [service of claim on city insufficient where correct public entity was city board of education]; cf. Jamison v. … Board of Education, supra, 250 Cal.App.2d at pp. 858-860; cf. City of San Jose v. Superior Court, supra, 12 Cal.3d at pp. 456-457.) Appellants’ reliance on Bettencourt v.

People v. Calban

65 Cal. App. 3d 578 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1976

Brown (G. A.), P. … In the present case, as in People v.

Riverside Sheriffs'assn. v. Bd. of Admin., Cal. Pub. Empl's'ret. Syst.

184 Cal. App. 4th 1 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2010

(Tuolumne County Deputy Sheriffs’ Assn. v. Board of Administration (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1236, 1238 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 824 ] (Tuolumne).) … (Crumpler v. Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567, 577 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 293 ] (Crumpler).)

Napa Valley Unified School Dist. v. State Bd. of Education

California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 2025

(See California School Boards Assn. v. … (See Harris v.

Hughes v. County of San Diego

35 Cal. App. 3d 349 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1973

Hughes relies on the recent California Supreme Court case of Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 ], to support his argument section 844.6 is unconstitutional. This reliance is misplaced. … Brown v. Merlo, supra, 8 Cal.3d 855 is not as directly analogous to this case as is the case of County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court, 62 Cal.2d 839 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 796 , 402 P.2d 868 ].

Wilshire Realty Co. v. Kry Corp.

250 Cal. App. 2d 269 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1967

(Jennings v. Jordan, 31 Cal.App. 335 [ 160 P. 576 ] ; Brion v. Cahill, 34 Cal.App. 258 [165 P. 704]; Stewart v. Bowie, 43 Cal.App. 751 [ 185 P. 868 ]; Hougton v. Kuehnrich, 46 Cal.App. 469 [ 189 P. 457 ].) … Brown, 180 Cal.App.2d 615, 624-625 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 734 ]; Boyd v. Lazarus, 198 Cal.App.2d 658, 663 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 333 ].) *278 There is another reason why plaintiff cannot recover its brokerage commission.

Center Healthcare Ed. & Res. v. Internat. Cong. Joint Reconst.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 2020

Downey (1879) 53 Cal. 466, 468-469, quoting Bain v. Brown (1874) 56 N.Y. 285, 288-289.) Notably, “[d]isgorgement as a remedy is broader than restitution or restoration of what the plaintiff lost.” … (Kelegian v.

C. L. Smith Co. v. Roger Ducharme, Inc.

65 Cal. App. 3d 735 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 1977

Board of Medical Examiners, 11 Cal.3d 1, 20 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ], and Cornelison v. Kornbluth, 15 Cal.3d 590, 596 [ 125 Cal.Rptr. 557 , 542 P.2d 981 ]. … (Snider v.

Johnson v. Taft School District

19 Cal. App. 2d 405 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 1937

(Saxton v. State Board of Education, 137 Cal. App. 167 [ 29 Pac. (2d) 873]; Bold v. Board of Medical Examiners, 135 Cal. … In Goldsmith v. Board of Education, 66 Cal. App. 157 , at 168 et seq. [ 225 Pac. 783, 787 ], it is said: “The teacher is entrusted with the custody of children and their high preparation for useful life.

In re Young

204 Cal. App. 4th 288 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 2012

According to our opinion in People v. … (Hayward v. Marshal (9th Cir. 2010) 603 F.3d 546, 563 .)

STATE TRIAL ATTORNEYS'ASSN v. State of California

63 Cal. App. 3d 298 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1976

(a); State v. Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen (1951) 37 Cal.2d 412, 421-422 [ 232 P.2d 857 ].) The State Personnel Board fixes the salaries of civil *302 service employees. … (See Board of Fish and Game Commissioners v. Riley (1924) 194 Cal. 37, 45-48 [ 227 P. 775 ]; see also, for example, Cal. Stats. 1974, chs. 266,345.)

Evans v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

67 Cal. App. 3d 162 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 1977

The defenses noted above raised by each of the real parties, other than Brown, are inappropriate in an unlawful detainer action, as is Shirley’s cross-complaint. (MCA, Inc. v. … (Byrne v. Baker, 221 Cal.App.2d 1 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 178 ]; Kartheiser v. Superior Court, supra, 174 Cal.App.2d 617 .) The contentions raised by real party Brown, however, differ from those raised by the other real parties.