Case law

In Re Andrade

46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 317 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 2006

(See Smith v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 216 Cal.App.3d 862, 868 [ 265 Cal.Rptr. 466 ].) We thus reach the question of whether such a requirement is a reasonable interpretation of the applicable regulation. … But this is precisely what the Board’s insistence that an illegal alien have employment plans in this country does. (See Martin v.

Baird v. City of Fresno

97 Cal. App. 2d 336 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1950

This rule is approved in McColgan v. Board of Police Commrs., 130 Cal.App. 66, 68, 69 [ 19 P.2d 815 ]. However, it is stated in Peters v. Sacramento City E. B. System, 27 Cal. … City of Los Angeles, 20 Cal.2d 599, 602 [ 127 P.2d 917 ] ; Hurley v. Sykes, 69 Cal.App. 310 [ 231 P. 748 ] ; Klench v. Board of Pension Fd. Commrs., 79 Cal.App. 171 [ 249 P. 46 ] ; Whitehead v.

Bd. of Ret. of Santa Barbara Cty. v. Santa Barbara Cty. Grand Jury

58 Cal. App. 4th 1185 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1997

(California School Employees Assn. v. Governing Board (1994) 8 Cal.4th 333, 338 [ 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 109 , 878 P.2d 1321 ]; City of San Jose v. … (Singh v. Board of Retirement, supra, 41 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1192-1193.)

United Ass'n of Journeymen v. City & County of San Francisco

32 Cal. App. 4th 751 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1995

Employees Union v. … Employees Union v.

American Chemical Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

42 Cal. App. 3d 45 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 1974

(Bank of America v. Mundo, supra, 37 Cal.2d 1, 5 [ 229 P.2d 345 ]; De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San Diego, 45 Cal.2d 546, 564 [ 290 P.2d 544 ]; Strumsky v. … In State of California v.

Swital v. Real Estate Commissioner

116 Cal. App. 2d 677 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1953

(Taboada v. Sociedad Espanola Etc. Mutua, supra; Ellis v. American Federation of Labor, supra; Cason v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn., supra.) … (Carson v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn., supra; Taboada v. Sociedad Espanola Etc. Mutua, supra; Von Arx v. San Francisco G. Verein, 113 Cal. 377, 379 [ 45 P. 685 ].)

Marriage of Brown and Chenoweth-Brown CA3

California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 2023

DAVID BROWN, (Super. Ct. No. SDR0053507) Appellant, v. … Brown (Reid),” “David Marc Brown (Reid),” “ David Reid (Brown)” and “David Marc Reid (Brown)” in filings with the trial court.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior Court

12 Cal. App. 4th 579 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1993

Rptr. 236 ]; Brown v. Superior Court (1985) 168 Cal. App.3d 489, 496-502 [ 214 Cal. Rptr. 266 ]; Mt. Diablo Hospital Medical Center v. Superior Court (1984) 158 Cal. App.3d 344 [ 204 Cal. … Rptr. 90 , 364 P.2d 266 ]; County of San Diego v. Superior Court (1986) 176 Cal. App.3d 1009, 1022 [ 222 Cal. Rptr. 484 ]; Board of Trustees v. Superior Court (1981) 119 Cal. App.3d 516, 524-526 [ 174 Cal. Rptr. 160 ].)

Aaris v. Las Virgenes Unified School District

64 Cal. App. 4th 1112 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 1998

Appellant and Lindsey Goldstein paired off to form the base and launched the flyer, Sharili Brown, into the air. Brown came down awkwardly, scratching their faces. … Appellant and Goldstein launched Brown into the air. Brown wobbled and fell on appellant, injuring her leg. *1116 Appellant had received stunt training while she was on the freshman high school cheerleading squad.

People v. Nagdeman

110 Cal. App. 3d 404 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1980

. *408 While Nagdeman was boarding his airplane, the officers learned from the ticket agent Nagdeman was headed for San Diego, California, via Houston, Texas. … A petition for a rehearing was denied October 15, 1980, and appellants’ petitions for a hearing by the Supreme Court were denied November 12, 1980. * Before Brown (Gerald), P.

Smith v. State Bd. of Equalization

53 Cal. App. 4th 331 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1997

Respondent San Diego County Assessor (Assessor) asked the State Board of Equalization (SBE) whether claimants were eligible for the exemption. … (Delta Air Lines, Inc. v.

Hellman v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

135 Cal. App. 627 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1933

“One who boards a street car at a regular stopping place becomes a passenger whether or not the carrier actually knows of his presence in the "car. In such a ease knowledge is implied.” (Ivancich v. … See, also, Cody v. Market St. Ry. Co., 148 Cal. 90 [ 82 Pac. 666 ] ; McCurrie v. Southern Pac. Co., 122 Cal. 561 [ 55 Pac. 324 ].

Greenberg v. Hollywood Turf Club

7 Cal. App. 3d 968 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1970

(“the Board”), Hills, Komik and Fluor. … Board in which plaintiff claims that he was improperly denied a hearing by the Board on his exclusion from the track stable area.

CDF FIREFIGHTERS v. Maldonado

70 Cal. Rptr. 3d 667 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 2008

(See Local 165 v. … (See NLRB v. Boeing Co. (1973) 412 U.S. 67 , 76-77 & fn. 12 [ 36 L.Ed.2d 752 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 ]; cf. Jost v.

Dry Creek Valley Ass'n Inc. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Sonoma Cty.

67 Cal. App. 3d 839 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1977

Young v. … Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Fargo (1973) 211 N.W.2d 399, 404 [ 63 A.L.R.3d 1064 ]). We have read and considered the cases of State v. Gruber (1962) 231 Ore. 494 [ 373 P.2d 657 ] and Ezell v.

People v. Pacific Guano Co.

55 Cal. App. 2d 845 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1942

Both Brown and the California Packing Corporation buy fertilizer from the plaintiff and use it on their respective farms. … As stated in City of Eureka v.

In re Woodham

95 Cal. App. 4th 438 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 2001

(Winikow v. … (See also Seykora v.

Goytino v. McAleer

4 Cal. App. 655 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1906

(People v. Grant, 126 N. Y. 476 , [ 27 N. E. 967 ].) The ordinance under consideration does not undertake to declare the keeping of a pool-table a nuisance. … A judgment in the proceedings in the superior court, when final, could be pleaded in bar of this action as a prior adjudication (McCormick v.

Orsetti v. City of Fremont

80 Cal. App. 3d 961 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 1978

(Joslin v. Marin Mun. Water Dist. (1967) 67 Cal.2d 132, 148 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 377 , 429 P.2d 889 ]; Brown v. City of Fremont, supra, 75 Cal.App.3d 141, 146 ; 4 Witkin, Cal. … We are cognizant of Brown v.

In Re Bush

74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 2008

In Arcadia Unified School Dist. v. … (See Jenkins v. County of Riverside (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 593, 621 [ 41 Cal.Rptr.3d 686 ]; People v.