Case law

Cheng v. Coastal L.B. Associates, LLC

California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 2021

The court in Brown v. … .”]; Brown, supra, 91 Cal.App.3d at p. 489; Venables v. Credential Ins.

City and County of San Francisco v. Evankovich

69 Cal. App. 3d 41 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1977

San Francisco, No. 703941) against one of the parties for publishing an advertisement urging the board of supervisors to engage in collective bargaining on grounds that that injunction was vague and overbroad and the court … Transit Authority v.

People v. Haines

123 Cal. App. 3d 861 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 23, 1981

I With respect to appellant’s first contention, we do find justification for the officer’s entry into the carport and seizure of the brown paper bag. In People v. … In People v.

People v. Banks

170 Cal. App. 2d 72 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1959

(People v. Kelsey, 140 Cal.App.2d 722 [ 295 P.2d 462 ].) The remaining contention to be noticed is that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. … (People v. Alonzo, 158 Cal.App.2d 45, 47-48 [ 322 P.2d 42 ].)

Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System v. Martin

219 Cal. App. 4th 924 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 2013

(Rales v. … (Taylor v.

Grell v. Laci Le Beau Corp.

73 Cal. App. 4th 1300 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 1999

Lakeview Creamery Co. (1937) 9 Cal.2d 16, 20-21 [ 68 P.2d 968 ] (Boyle)), seek a writ of mandate (Brown v. … (Meyer v. State Board of Equalization (1954) 42 Cal.2d 376, 384 [ 267 P.2d 257 ].)

In Re Retirement Cases

1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 790 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 11, 2003

(Betts v. Board of Administration (1978) 21 Cal.3d 859, 866 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 158 , 582 P.2d 614 ].) … equity”; they cite Board of Administration v.

Curtis v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transporation

128 Cal. App. 3d 668 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1982

(Gregory v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 12 Cal.3d 899, 902 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 694 , 528 P.2d 782 ], citing Roe v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board, supra, 12 Cal.3d 884 .) … Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Zenovich, J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied March 10, 1982, and the opinion was modified to read as printed above.

People v. Crosby CA1/4

California Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 2024

Filed 10/10/24 P. v. … WE CONCUR: BROWN, P. J. STREETER, J. 4

County of Los Angeles v. Nesvig

231 Cal. App. 2d 600 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 1965

by the board of supervisors. … While mandamus is a proper remedy to require a public officer such as the clerk of the Board of Supervisors to perform a ministerial act (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085; City of Palm Springs v.

Burns v. Southern Pacific Co.

43 Cal. App. 667 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1919

Two cases decided by this court are cited as authority, as follows: Brown v. Lemon Cove Ditch Co., 36 Cal. App. 94 , [ 171 Pac. 705 ], and Reynolds v. E. Clemens Horst Co., 35 Cal. … In the ease of Hackleberry v. Sherlock Land & Cattle Co., 39 Cal.

Millsap v. Alderson

63 Cal. App. 518 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1923

Alderson, 55 Cal.App. 527 [ 203 P. 809 ], and Harlan v. Alderson, 55 Cal.App. 263 [ 203 P. 1014 ]. … (See, also, Fletcher v. Prather, 102 Cal. 413 -419 [ 36 P. 658 ]; Vallejo etc. R. R. Co. v. Reed Orchard Co., 177 Cal. 249 [ 170 P. 426 ].)

People v. Frye

166 Cal. App. 3d 941 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1985

She further stated an old brown car was parked across the street. Officer Winter testified no brown car was parked at Do-ray’s house that night. … Nancy R. and Winter testified no old brown car was parked in front of Doray’s home. The brown car was parked across the street.

People v. Strauss

75 Cal. App. 447 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1925

In People v. Anderson, 59 Cal. … (People v. Peery, 26 Cal. App. 143 [ 146 Pac. 44 ]; People v. Mooney, 132 Cal. 13 [ 63 Pac. 1070 ]; People v. Matuszewski, 138 Cal. 533 [ 71 Pac. 701 ]; People v. Feld, 149 Cal. 464 [ 86 Pac. 1100 ].)

People v. Von Mullendorf

110 Cal. App. 2d 286 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1952

(People v. Browning, 132 Cal.App. 136, 147 [ 22 P.2d 784 ].) Criminal intent, however, is seldom susceptible of direct proof. (People v. … In People v. Rhoades, 93 Cal.App.2d 448, 450 [ 209 P.2d 33 ], this identical problem was considered.

People v. Pratt

77 Cal. App. 2d 571 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 1947

(People v. Newland, supra, at page 681.) … The case of People v.

People v. New Penn Mines, Inc.

212 Cal. App. 2d 667 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1963

(People v. Truckee Lumber Co., 116 Cal. 397 [ 48 P. 374 , 58 Am.St.Rep. 183 , 39 L.R.A. 581 ] ; People v. Glenn-Colusa Irr. Dist., 127 Cal.App. 30 [ 15 P.2d 549 ].) … (See People v. Lim, 18 Cal.2d 872 [ 118 P.2d 472 ].)

Rodas v. Spiegel

104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 439 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2001

Malicious Prosecution In Hogen v. … There is no qualitative difference in the manner in which these two state boards are "empowered and directed" to investigate complaints from the public. ( Hogen v.

Baird v. City of Fresno

97 Cal. App. 2d 336 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1950

This rule is approved in McColgan v. Board of Police Commrs., 130 Cal.App. 66, 68, 69 [ 19 P.2d 815 ]. However, it is stated in Peters v. Sacramento City E. B. System, 27 Cal. … City of Los Angeles, 20 Cal.2d 599, 602 [ 127 P.2d 917 ] ; Hurley v. Sykes, 69 Cal.App. 310 [ 231 P. 748 ] ; Klench v. Board of Pension Fd. Commrs., 79 Cal.App. 171 [ 249 P. 46 ] ; Whitehead v.

Weinstein v. County of Los Angeles

237 Cal. App. 4th 944 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 2015

(B) RAMSELL II3 On June 15, 2012, the County published a notice under the Brown Act that it would ask the Board at its regularly scheduled June 19, 2012 meeting to authorize the award and execution of another $75 … (Santa Ana Tustin Community Hospital v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 127 Cal.App.3d 644, 652.)” (Mike Moore’s 24-Hour Towing v. City of San Diego (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1294, 1303 (Mike Moore’s 24-Hour Towing).)