Case law

Cheng v. Coastal L.B. Associates, LLC

California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 2021

The court in Brown v. … .”]; Brown, supra, 91 Cal.App.3d at p. 489; Venables v. Credential Ins.

Knight v. Contracting Engineers Co.

194 Cal. App. 2d 435 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1961

the board in the position it was in when he fell. … (Florez v. Groom Development Co., 53 Cal.2d 347, 354-355 [ 348 P.2d 200 ] ; Pauly v. King, 44 Cal.2d 649, 653 [ 284 P.2d 487 ] ; Brown v. San Francisco Ball Club, Inc., 99 Cal.App.2d 484, 486 [ 222 P.2d 19 ].)

City and County of San Francisco v. Evankovich

69 Cal. App. 3d 41 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1977

San Francisco, No. 703941) against one of the parties for publishing an advertisement urging the board of supervisors to engage in collective bargaining on grounds that that injunction was vague and overbroad and the court … Transit Authority v.

People v. Orellana

California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 2022

Indeed, as noted ante, the court made the same observation in Brown. (See Brown, supra, 54 Cal.4th at p. 325.) While Orellana is correct that the California Supreme Court in both People v. … (Brown, at p. 325, fn. 15.) The language Orellana relies upon in People v.

Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System v. Martin

219 Cal. App. 4th 924 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 2013

(Rales v. … (Taylor v.

Grell v. Laci Le Beau Corp.

73 Cal. App. 4th 1300 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 1999

Lakeview Creamery Co. (1937) 9 Cal.2d 16, 20-21 [ 68 P.2d 968 ] (Boyle)), seek a writ of mandate (Brown v. … (Meyer v. State Board of Equalization (1954) 42 Cal.2d 376, 384 [ 267 P.2d 257 ].)

Branches Neighborhood Corp. v. CalAtlantic Group, Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 2018

(Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. Browne George Ross LLP (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 749, 765.) The question, then, is whether that principle applies to the instant case. … (See, e.g., Board of Education v. Round Valley Teachers Assn. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 269; Ahdout v. Hekmatjah (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 21; Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 431; City of Palo Alto v.

Curtis v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transporation

128 Cal. App. 3d 668 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1982

(Gregory v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 12 Cal.3d 899, 902 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 694 , 528 P.2d 782 ], citing Roe v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board, supra, 12 Cal.3d 884 .) … Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Zenovich, J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied March 10, 1982, and the opinion was modified to read as printed above.

People v. Crosby CA1/4

California Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 2024

Filed 10/10/24 P. v. … WE CONCUR: BROWN, P. J. STREETER, J. 4

United Farm Workers of America v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd.

74 Cal. App. 3d 347 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 1977

“Final order” means solely an order of the board either dismissing a complaint in whole or in part or directing a remedy for the unfair labor practices found. (E.g., Shell Chemical Company v. … In Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc. v. ALRB (5 Civ. 3395), and two other cases, the Fifth District issued the following brief order: “1.

County of Los Angeles v. Nesvig

231 Cal. App. 2d 600 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 1965

by the board of supervisors. … While mandamus is a proper remedy to require a public officer such as the clerk of the Board of Supervisors to perform a ministerial act (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085; City of Palm Springs v.

People v. Pratt

77 Cal. App. 2d 571 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 1947

(People v. Newland, supra, at page 681.) … The case of People v.

H. D. Haley & Co. v. McVay

70 Cal. App. 438 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1924

(Forward v. County of San Diego, 189 Cal. 704, 709 [ 209 Pac. 993 ].) In Skidmore v. … As said in Skidmore v.

People v. Huynh

121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 340 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 2002

(See People v. Myers (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 1523, 1535 [ 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 889 ]; People v. Brown (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 1585, 1594 [ 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 155 ].) … (People v.

People v. Frye

166 Cal. App. 3d 941 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1985

She further stated an old brown car was parked across the street. Officer Winter testified no brown car was parked at Do-ray’s house that night. … Nancy R. and Winter testified no old brown car was parked in front of Doray’s home. The brown car was parked across the street.

Robertson v. City of Los Angeles

6 Cal. App. 2d 289 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1935

As we observed in Haigh v. … Co. v.

Plaza Hollister Ltd. Partnership v. County of San Benito

84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 715 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1999

(Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners (1998) 17 Cal.4th 763, 775 [ 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 624 , 952 P.2d 641 ].) … On the other hand, courts are authorized to conduct an independent reassessment ‘when a board of equalization purports to decide a question of law.’ (Board of Supervisors v.

Dropo v. City & County of San Francisco

167 Cal. App. 2d 453 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1959

Pipoly v. … (Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service Commrs., 21 Cal.2d 399, 402 [ 132 P.2d 804 ]; see also 45 Cal.Jur.2d p. 550 et seq., § 25, and 82 C.J.S. p. 554, § 317.)

People v. New Penn Mines, Inc.

212 Cal. App. 2d 667 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1963

(People v. Truckee Lumber Co., 116 Cal. 397 [ 48 P. 374 , 58 Am.St.Rep. 183 , 39 L.R.A. 581 ] ; People v. Glenn-Colusa Irr. Dist., 127 Cal.App. 30 [ 15 P.2d 549 ].) … (See People v. Lim, 18 Cal.2d 872 [ 118 P.2d 472 ].)

Mink v. MACCABEE

17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 486 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 2004

Shortly thereafter, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Huskinson & Brown v. Wolf (2004) 32 Cal.4th 453 [ 9 Cal.Rptr.3d 693 , 84 P.3d 379 ]. … Brown, J., did not participate therein.