Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.02s

  • Arditto v. Putnam

    214 Cal. App. 2d 633 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1963

    See Deary v. Shields, 54 Cal.App.2d 795, 799 [ 129 P.2d 935 ]; Gunning v. Forbes, 60 Cal.App.2d, 521, 523 [ 141 P.2d 30 ]; Waller v. Southern Cal. Gas Co., 170 Cal.App.2d 747, 757 [ 339 P.2d 577 ]; Jones v. … Brown, 176 Cal.App.2d 184, 186 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 267 ]; Williams v. Hawley, 144 Cal. 97, 100 [ 77 P. 762 ]; Studer v. Plough, 179 Cal.App.2d 436, 440 [ 3 Cal. Rptr. 785 ]; Tyra v. Board of Police & Fire etc.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Estate of Miller

    230 Cal. App. 2d 888 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1964

    Bank v. … In Zappettini v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • La Shells v. Hench

    98 Cal. App. 6 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1929

    In the case of Harby v. Board of Education, 2 Cal. … In the case of Curtin v. Board of Police Commrs., 74 Cal.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Budget Realty, Inc. v. Hunter

    157 Cal. App. 3d 511 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1984

    (Brown v. Jensen (1953) 41 Cal.2d 193, 198 [ 259 P.2d 425 ]; Shepherd v. Robinson (1981) 128 Cal.App.3d 615, 623 [ 180 Cal.Rptr. 342 ].) … Spangler explicitly reaffirmed the “continued vitality” ( 7 Cal.3d at p. 609 ) of Brown v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • In Re Lazor

    172 Cal. App. 4th 1185 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 2009

    The court is directed to forward a copy of the order as modified to the Board. Rushing, P. J., and Premo, J., concurred. 1 We take judicial notice of the Court of Appeal opinion People v. … (People v. Martinez (2003) 31 Cal.4th 673, 705 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 648 , 74 P.3d 748 ].)

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • In Re Barker

    59 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2007

    Johnson [v. Texas (1993) 509 U.S. 350, 368 ] [ 125 L.Ed.2d 290 , 113 S.Ct. 2658 ][;] Roper v. Simmons [(2005)] 543 U.S. 551 , 561-562 *377 [ 161 L.Ed.2d 1 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 ]; see also Thompson v. … (Barker v. Estelle (9th Cir. 1990) 913 F.2d 1433, 1435 .)

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • In re Coleman

    236 Cal. App. 4th 1013 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2015

    (Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (2004) 34 Cal.4th 733, 737; accord Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 717, 724.) … (Hodges v. Superior Court (1999) 21 Cal.4th 109, 120 (Hodges).)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Mason v. RETIREMENT BD. CITY & COUNTY SF

    4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 619 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 2003

    (See, e.g., Alesi v. Board of Retirement (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 597, 601 [ 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 81 ].) … (Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Com., supra, 43 Cal.3d at p. 1387 .) Appellants also contend the Board’s interpretation is inconsistent with language in Suastez v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Sinclair v. Baker

    219 Cal. App. 2d 817 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 1963

    (Fichera v. … (Cooper v. State Board of Public Health (1951) 102 Cal.App.2d 926, 933 [ 229 P.2d 27 ].) Such is the casé- here. Petitioner has no grounds for complaint.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • SDC/Pullman Partners v. Tolo Inc.

    60 Cal. App. 4th 37 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1997

    (Brown v. Green, supra, 8 Cal.4th at pp. 830-833; Hadian v. Schwartz, supra, 8 Cal.4th at pp. 847-849.) … Thus in Brown , the absolute cost of the curative action was high (about *49 $250,000), but constituted less than 5 percent of the reserved rent. The costs were to be borne by the tenant. (See Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jaffe v. Huxley Architecture

    200 Cal. App. 3d 1188 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1988

    As a general rule, a board is not personally liable to third parties for negligence amounting to a breach of duty which the officer owes to the corporation alone. (Frances T. v. … (Maynard v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. (1867) 34 Cal. 48 , 57 . . . .)” (Signal Oil etc. Co. v. Ashland Oil etc. Co. (1958) 49 Cal.2d 764, 779 [ 322 P.2d 1 ].)

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Rhoades v. Lyons

    34 Cal. App. 615 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1917

    The cited cases are Bolander v. Gentry, 36 Cal. 105 , [ 95 Am. Dec. 162 ], and Pico v. Pico, 56 Cal. 453 . In Bolander v. … (O’Connor v. Blake, 29 Cal. 316 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Entezampour v. North Orange County Community College District

    190 Cal. App. 4th 832 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 2010

    (Excelsior College v. Board of Registered Nursing (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 1218, 1238-1239 [ 39 Cal.Rptr.3d 618 ].) B. … (Excelsior College v. Board of Registered Nursing, supra, 136 Cal.App.4th at p. 1239 .)

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • California St. Emp. Assn. v. Pub. Emp. Rel. Bd.

    51 Cal. App. 4th 923 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1996

    (See Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 177 [ 172 Cal. … No. 51 [2 PERC ¶ 2107]; see also Labor Board v. Katz (1962) 369 U.S. 736 [ 8 L.Ed.2d 230 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 ].) In the landmark decision of Labor Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Law School Admission Council, Inc. v. State

    222 Cal. App. 4th 1265 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 2014

    (Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 441-442.) … (People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 328; In re J. (1979) 25 Cal.3d 522, 530.) As a corporation, LSAC “is considered a „person‟ entitled to the constitutional guarantee of equal protection.” (Walgreen Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Barnes v. Blue Haven Pools

    1 Cal. App. 3d 123 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1969

    (Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co., 237 Cal.App.2d 44, 49-50 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 552 ]; McClary v. Concord Ave. Motors, 202 Cal.App.2d 564 [ 21 Cal.Rptr. 1 ]; Kramer v. Barnes, 212 Cal.App.2d 440, 449 [ 27 Cal.Rptr. 895 ].) … There are, of course, cases such as Swope v. Moskovitz, 253 Cal.App.2d 514 [ 61 Cal.Rptr. 277 ]; Snider v. Snider, 200 Cal.App.2d 741 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 709 ]; Schessler v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • McDonald v. Richards

    79 Cal. App. 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1926

    As stated in the case of Board of Education v. … To the same effect is the case of Board of Education v. Common Council, 1 Cal. App. 311 [ 82 Pac. 89 ].

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Zamani

    183 Cal. App. 4th 854 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 2010

    Defendant cites People v. … (People v. Russell (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 1415, 1431 [ 51 Cal.Rptr.3d 263 ].)

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • People v. Singer

    217 Cal. App. 2d 743 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1963

    Brown meant by that word. That this was a new technique. … Brown took this information.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Howitt v. Superior Court

    3 Cal. App. 4th 1575 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1992

    In Chosick v. … In Ford v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.