Case law

People v. Cates

170 Cal. App. 4th 545 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2009

People v. Selga (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 113 [ 75 Cal.Rptr.3d 453 ] and People v. Brown (2001) 96 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 [ 117 Cal.Rptr.2d 738 ] are instructive. … In Brown , the defendant was convicted of vandalizing his wife’s car following an altercation. (People v. Brown, supra, 96 Cal.App.4th at pp. Supp. 6-8, 13.)

Bank of America National trust & Savings Ass'n v. Button

23 Cal. App. 2d 651 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1937

App. (2d) 423 [ 48 Pac. (2d) 120 ]; Brown v. Brown, 83 Cal. App. 74 [ 256 Pac. 595 ]; Ralphs v. Hensler, 97 Cal. 296 [ 32 Pac. 243 ].) This rule has been made subject to exception, in the discretion of the court. … (Sewell v. Johnson, 165 Cal. 762 [ 134 Pac. 704 , Ann. Cas. 1915B, 645] ; City of Los Angeles v. Abbott, 217 Cal. 184 [ 17 Pac. (2d) 993 ].)

Willett v. Superior Court

2 Cal. App. 3d 555 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1969

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … People v.

State Water Resources Control Bd. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 2025

(See Cohen v. … (Western Oil & Gas Assn. v. Air Resources Board (1984) 37 Cal.3d 502, 509.)

In Re Lewis

172 Cal. App. 4th 13 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2009

(Board of Prison Terms v. Superior Court, supra, 130 Cal.App.4th at p. 1237 .) … (Board of Prison Terms v. Superior Court, supra, 130 Cal.App.4th at p. 1239 .)

Cornejo v. Lightbourne

220 Cal. App. 4th 932 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 2013

(Gatto v. … (Garcia v.

Horne v. Rainey

3 Cal. App. 2d 382 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1934

Assn. v. California Sav. & Commercial Bank, 218 Cal. 261 [ 22 Pac. (2d) 704 ].) … (Anderson v. Pacific Bank, 112 Cal. 598 [ 44 Pac. 1063 , 53 Am. St. Rep. 228 , 32 L. R. A. 479]; Bank of America v. California Bank, supra.) The judgment is reduced to $4,000, and as so modified it is affirmed.

Continental Insurance v. City of Los Angeles

92 Cal. App. 585 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1928

Los Angeles, 151 Cal. 655 [ 91 Pac. 795 ].) ” (Geimann v. Board of Police Commrs., 158 Cal. 748 [ 112 Pac. 553 ].) … The demand should first be presented to the board, so that if it approved the demand it could recommend the “expenditure.” (Geimann v. Board of Police Commrs., supra.)

DeYoung v. Commission on Professional Competence of the Hueneme Elementary School District

228 Cal. App. 4th 568 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 2014

He contends Pennel v. Pond Union School Dist. (1973) 29 Cal.App.3d 832, 839, and Governing Board v. … In Governing Board v.

John Doe R.L. v. Merced City Sch. Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 2025

(Brown v. Crandall (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1, 8; Vaughn v. LJ Internat., Inc. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 213, 219.) “We review de novo questions of interpretation and constitutionality of a statute.” (Finberg v. … (West Contra Costa, supra, at p. 1269.) 12 12 District cites Conlin v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 99 Cal. 17, Orange County Foundation v. Irvine Co. (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 195, and Jordan v.

Gaumer v. County of Tehama

247 Cal. App. 2d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 1967

Board of Trustee, 165 Cal. 298, 300-301 [ 131 P. 859]; see also Birch v. … Since that time had expired, it was also then beyond the power of the board of supervisors to sit as a board of equalization. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 1603 (as it then read); Birch v.

Dierssen v. Civil Service Commission

43 Cal. App. 2d 53 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1941

Board of Police Commrs., 30 Cal. App. (2d) 211 [ 86 Pac. (2d) 118 ].) It is true that in Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 6 Cal. (2d) 557 [ 59 Pac. (2d) 119 ], and Drummey v. … (French v. Cook, 173 Cal. 126 [ 160 Pac. 411 ] ; Sheehan v. Board of Police Commrs., 197 Cal. 70 [ 239 Pac. 844 ] ; Sheehan v. Board of Police Commrs., 47 Cal. App. 29 [ 190 Pac. 51 ].)

People v. Darby

114 Cal. App. 2d 412 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1952

(Milliken v. Meyers, 25 Cal.App. 510, 514 [ 144 P. 321 ].) The school district is a state agency and its board members are state officers. (People v. Richards, 86 Cal.App. 86, 94 [ 260 P. 582 ].) … (See Ventura County Harbor Dist. v. Board of Supervisors, 211 Cal. 271, 276 [ 295 P. 6 ].)

Burien, LLC v. Wiley

230 Cal. App. 4th 1039 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 2014

(Doe v. Brown (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 408, 417.) We begin with the words of the statute. (Ibid.) “Words used in a statute or constitutional provision should be given the meaning they bear in ordinary use. [Citations.] … (Lungren v. Deukmejian (1988) 45 Cal.3d 727, 735.)

Holmby Westwood Property Owners Assn. v. Focus Line CA2/2

California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 2025

She also identified Ellen Turner, another POA board member and ASC member, as Larian’s point person after plans were submitted. On August 3, 2020, Larian sent Brown excerpts of the plans approved by the City. … As no one asserts otherwise, we assume Brown was admitted as a member pursuant to this provision of the bylaws and elected president of the board.

Willis v. Prime Healthcare Services, Inc.

231 Cal. App. 4th 615 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 2014

(Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown (2012) 565 U.S. __, __ [132 S.Ct. 1201, 1203-1204]; see Mave Enterprises, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 1408, 1428 & fn. 6.) … While the individual contracts were in effect, the union filed a petition for certification as a bargaining representative with the National Labor Relations Board (the board). (Ibid.)

People v. Elliott

115 Cal. App. 2d 410 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1953

Clearly a member of the board of education falls within the foregoing rule. (Cf. People v. Richards, 86 Cal.App. 86, 89 [ 260 P. 582 ].) … (People v. Hill, 116 Cal. 562, 570 [ 48 P. 711 ]. See, also, People v. Chapman, 93 Cal.App.2d 365, 385 [24] [ 209 P.2d 121 ] ; People v. Corbin, 118 Cal.App. 392, 396 [ 5 P.2d 460 ]; People v.

People Ex Rel. Sill v. Murphy

20 Cal. App. 398 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1912

People v. … (State v. Marston, 6 Kan. 524 ; Peters v. Board of State Canvassers, 17 Kan. 365 ; State v. Stevens, 23 Kan. 456 , [ 33 Am. Rep. 175 ]; People v. Board of Canvassers, 129 N. Y. 360 , [14 L. R. A. 646, 29 N.

SHC Half Moon Bay, LLC v. County of San Mateo

226 Cal. App. 4th 471 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2014

(See Elk Hills Power, LLC v. Board of Equalization (2013) 57 Cal.4th 593, 606-607 (Elk Hills).) … (c); Sky River LLC v.

Estate of Pailhe

114 Cal. App. 2d 658 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1952

Appellant relies upon Olcese v. Superior Court, 210 Cal. 566 [ 292 P. 964 ], and Bank of America v. Fidelity & D. … (Chapman v.