Case law

Nave v. Nave

35 Cal. App. 27 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1917

Thus in Eslinger v. Eslinger, 47 Cal. 62 , and Brown v. Brown, 60 Cal. 579 , the court changed the decree of the lower court and awarded the innocent party three-fourths of the community. … It does not appear in the Eslinger or Brown case that the party to whom the larger share was awarded had to provide for any children; nevertheless, the award was made. Butin Strozynski v.

In Re Chaudhary

172 Cal. App. 4th 32 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2009

In Martin v. … (Martin v. Marshall (N.D.Cal. 2006) 431 F.Supp.2d 1038, 1040 .) In Carlin v. Wong (N.D.Cal. Aug. 4, 2008, No. C 06-4145 SI) 2008 U.S.Dist.

Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Superior Court

185 Cal. App. 3d 1232 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 1986

(Morton v. Superior Court, supra, 9 Cal.App.3d 977, 982.) … (Karlin v. Zalta, supra, 154 Cal.App.3d 953, 979-980 .)

People v. Delph

94 Cal. App. 3d 411 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1979

Appellant cites Marvin v. … (People v. Mosher, supra.)

Thomas v. Superior Court

22 Cal. App. 3d 972 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 1972

(See also, People v. Brown (1962) 205 Cal.App.2d 188, 193 [ 22 Cal.Rptr. 835 ].) *978 In Abt v. … Fein (1971) 4 Cal.3d 747, 755, fn. 3 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 607 , 484 P.2d 583 ]; People v. Brown (1969) 271 Cal.App.2d 391, 395 [ 76 Cal.Rptr. 568 ]; People v. Ouellette (1969) 271 Cal.App.2d 33 [ 76 Cal.Rptr. 346 ]; People v.

Steed v. Department of Consumer Affairs

204 Cal. App. 4th 112 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 2012

(Professional Engineers v. … (See Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v.

In Re Burns

40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 2006

People v. … (See People v. Hardy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 86, 150 [ 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 796 , 825 P.2d 781 ]; People v. Wharton (1991) 53 Cal.3d 522, 563 [ 280 Cal.Rptr. 631 , 809 P.2d 290 ].) In any event, the claim has no merit.

Souza v. Board of Adminstration of the Public Employees' Retirement System CA3

California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2025

Souza cites Handler v. Board of Supervisors (1952) 39 Cal.2d 282 and Kennedy v. … (Handler v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 39 Cal.2d at p. 286; see id. at pp. 283-284.)

Quintero v. City of Santa Ana

7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 896 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 2003

(D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 18-19 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].) … Howitt v.

Baines v. Zuieback

84 Cal. App. 2d 483 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1948

The written contract was between Brown and several defendants. Wilson, the plaintiff, sued, alleging that Brown was his undisclosed agent. He did not join Brown as a party to the suit. … Brown *493 as stated therein.” In the present ease the original lessor was not a party to the sublease. Buck Auto Carriage & Implement Co. v.

In Re Scott

15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 32 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 2004

first of *895 the two circumstances the Board relied upon to find Scott unsuitable for release. 14 V. … Constitution *899 (see, e.g., Biggs v.

Honig v. San Francisco Planning Department

25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 649 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 2005

(Travis v. County of Santa Cruz, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 766, fn. 2 .) … (Lungren v. Deukmejian (1988) 45 Cal.3d 727, 735 [ 248 Cal.Rptr. 115 , 755 P.2d 299 ]; People v. Belton (1979) 23 Cal.3d 516, 526 [ 153 Cal.Rptr. 195 , 591 P.2d 485 ]; Lujan v.

In re M.U. CA2/8

California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 2021

(People v. Rodriguez (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1, 11.) We will reverse only if “ ‘it appears “that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient substantial evidence to support” ’ the [judgment].” (People v. … Just as Emma resided at a boarding residence but had her friend maintain and check on her house, Clarence Brown stayed at a V.A. home, but had his daughter Cynthia check on the house at least once a month, maintain his furniture

In Re Marriage of Nicolaides

39 Cal. App. 3d 192 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1974

(Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners, supra, at p. 359.) … Brown (G. A.), P.

North Side Property Owners' Ass'n v. Hillside Memorial Park

70 Cal. App. 2d 609 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1945

Board of Police Commissioners, 59 Cal.App.2d 771 [ 140 P.2d 130 ]; Sipper v. Urban, 22 Cal.2d 138 [ 137 P.2d 425 ]). … Retirement Board, 65 Cal.App.2d 781, 793 [ 151 P.2d 549 ]; Greif v. Dullea, 66 Cal.App. 2d 986, 1009 [ 153 P.2d 581 ]; Dierssen v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Cal.App.2d 53, 63 [ 110 P.2d 513 ]).

In Re Betterncourt

67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 497 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 2007

The Board petitioned this court for writ relief and we issued a peremptory writ of mandate vacating the order to show cause. (Board of Prison Terms v. … He relies on the federal court decisions in Biggs v. Terhune (9th Cir. 2003) 334 F.3d 910 , Irons v. Carey (9th Cir. 2007) 479 F.3d 658 , and Rosenkrantz v.

Hammond Lumber Co. v. County of Los Angeles

104 Cal. App. 235 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1930

Co. v. County of Los Angeles, supra; Southern Pac. Land Co. v. County of San Diego, supra; Wores v. Imperial Irr. Dist., 193 Cal. 609, 627-629 [ 227 Pac. 181 ] ; Birck v. … (New Orleans Cotton Exchange v. Board of Assessors, 37 La. Ann. 423, 426 .)

American Canyon Fire Protection District v. County of Napa

141 Cal. App. 3d 100 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1983

Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636, 641-642 [ 107 P.2d 388 ]; People v. Garrett (1925) 72 Cal.App. 452, 455-458 [ 237 P. 829 ]; cf. City of Imperial Beach v. … As in McClain v.

Dep't of Indus. Relations v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

94 Cal. App. 3d 72 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1979

There was substantial evidence as found by the Board that Jeremy was, in fact, a member of the deceased worker’s household and his partial dependent. (See Moore S. Corp. v. Industrial Acc. … (See MacArthur v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1934) 220 Cal. 142 [ 29 P.2d 846 ]; Insurance Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1921) *77 187 Cal. 469 [ 202 P. 664 ]; Moore S. Corp. v. Industrial Acc.

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Superior Court

184 Cal. App. 4th 1124 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 2010

Fallon, supra, 3 Cal.3d at p. 884 , quoting Meyer v. State Board of Equalization (1954) 42 Cal.2d 376, 384 [ 267 P.2d 257 ].) Thus, an amended complaint supersedes all prior complaints. (Grell v. … (See Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries (1994) 7 Cal.4th 926, 931 [ 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 440 , 873 P.2d 613 ].)