Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.68s

  • Laflin & Laflin v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR REL. BD.

    166 Cal. App. 3d 368 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1985

    (E.g., Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board (1941) 313 U.S. 177, 194 [ 85 L.Ed. 1271, 1283 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 133 A.L.R. 1217 ]; Carian v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd., supra, 36 Cal.3d at pp. 673-674; Pandol & Sons v. … (Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board (1940) 311 U.S. 7, 12 [ 85 L.Ed. 6, 10 , 61 S.Ct. 77 ].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cook v. Superior Court

    73 Cal. Rptr. 3d 895 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 2008

    (a)) uses the word “shall.” 4 (See also Weil & Brown, Cal. … (See Palma v. U.S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Venice Town Council, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

    47 Cal. App. 4th 1547 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1996

    (Green v. Obledo (1981) 29 Cal.3d 126, 144 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 206 , 624 P.2d 256 ]; see also Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 49 Cal.3d 432, 439 ; McKeon v. … (See, e.g., Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 442 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 777 P.2d 610 ]; Miguel v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Sevina v. Hickok

    113 Cal. App. 301 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1931

    Board of Police Commrs., 197 Cal. 70 [ 239 Pac. 844 ], Garvin v. Chambers, 195 Cal. 212 [ 232 Pac. 696 ], Boyd v. Pendergast, 57 Cal. App. 504 [ 207 Pac. 713 ], French v. … (Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., 100 Cal. App. 270, 276 [ 279 Pac. 1080 ].)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Quintero v. City of Santa Ana

    7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 896 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 2003

    (D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 18-19 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].) … Howitt v.

    Disapproved in part by Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. State Water Resources Control Board, 45 Cal. 4th 731 (2009)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • People v. Elliott

    115 Cal. App. 2d 410 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1953

    Clearly a member of the board of education falls within the foregoing rule. (Cf. People v. Richards, 86 Cal.App. 86, 89 [ 260 P. 582 ].) … (People v. Hill, 116 Cal. 562, 570 [ 48 P. 711 ]. See, also, People v. Chapman, 93 Cal.App.2d 365, 385 [24] [ 209 P.2d 121 ] ; People v. Corbin, 118 Cal.App. 392, 396 [ 5 P.2d 460 ]; People v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • People v. Parra

    30 Cal. App. 3d 729 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 21, 1973

    Section 197 is cited by the Supreme Court in People v. … (People v. Smith, supra, 7 Cal.3d at p. 287 .)

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water Agency

    91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 66 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 1999

    (See Laurel Heights I, supra, 47 Cal.3d at p. 409 ; Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 863 [ 226 Cal.Rptr. 575 ].) … {City of Vernon v. Board of Harbor Comrs. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 677, 688 [ 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 497 ].)

    Cited 111 timesPublished
  • Kelley v. Olympic Pharmacy

    144 Cal. App. 2d 43 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 20, 1956

    Brown stated that the pages in question were missing. … It was said in Barkis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Continental Insurance v. City of Los Angeles

    92 Cal. App. 585 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1928

    Los Angeles, 151 Cal. 655 [ 91 Pac. 795 ].) ” (Geimann v. Board of Police Commrs., 158 Cal. 748 [ 112 Pac. 553 ].) … The demand should first be presented to the board, so that if it approved the demand it could recommend the “expenditure.” (Geimann v. Board of Police Commrs., supra.)

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Coachella Valley Water Dist.

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 2025

    determined by the board. … (See Friedland v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schifando v. City of Los Angeles

    118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 286 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 2002

    Brown, Assistant City Attorney, and Marie McTeague, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent. KITCHING, J. We address an issue in this case that the California Supreme Court has identified but has not decided. … Board of Civil Service Commrs. (1945) 26 Cal.2d 716, 721 , 160 P.2d 816 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

    42 Cal. App. 3d 32 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 1974

    (Stenocord Corp. v. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 63 Cal.2d 222, 233 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 869 , 404 P.2d 477 ].)

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Souza v. Board of Adminstration of the Public Employees' Retirement System CA3

    California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2025

    Souza cites Handler v. Board of Supervisors (1952) 39 Cal.2d 282 and Kennedy v. … (Handler v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 39 Cal.2d at p. 286; see id. at pp. 283-284.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Dep't of Indus. Relations v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

    94 Cal. App. 3d 72 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1979

    There was substantial evidence as found by the Board that Jeremy was, in fact, a member of the deceased worker’s household and his partial dependent. (See Moore S. Corp. v. Industrial Acc. … (See MacArthur v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1934) 220 Cal. 142 [ 29 P.2d 846 ]; Insurance Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1921) *77 187 Cal. 469 [ 202 P. 664 ]; Moore S. Corp. v. Industrial Acc.

    Disapproved on other grounds by Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, 31 Cal. 3d 715 (1982)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Cal. State Personnel Board CA4/2

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 2022

    (Ackerman v. State Personnel Board (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 8 395, 400 (Ackerman); see also Board of Trustees v. … (Fisher v. State Personnel Board (2018) 25 Cal.App.5th 1, 23.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cabrera v. Alam

    197 Cal. App. 4th 1077 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 2011

    (Hassan v. … Weinberg v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • People v. Darby

    114 Cal. App. 2d 412 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1952

    (Milliken v. Meyers, 25 Cal.App. 510, 514 [ 144 P. 321 ].) The school district is a state agency and its board members are state officers. (People v. Richards, 86 Cal.App. 86, 94 [ 260 P. 582 ].) … (See Ventura County Harbor Dist. v. Board of Supervisors, 211 Cal. 271, 276 [ 295 P. 6 ].)

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Jenkins v. Insurance Co. of North America

    220 Cal. App. 3d 1481 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1990

    Jeffrey Brown, et al. v. Jenkins, et al. (Super.Ct. Orange County, No. 29-31-50). Thereafter, the remaining affected homeowner, Foell, initiated a separate lawsuit. Jenkins requested a defense by Mission. … The plaintiff’s in the Brown action then contacted Mission to procure additional funds.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Palm Springs Homes, Inc. v. Western Desert, Inc.

    215 Cal. App. 2d 270 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1963

    (Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v. Los Angeles Joint Board etc. Workers, 192 Cal.App.2d 268, 276 [ 13 Cal.Rptr. 446 ].) … Brown (G.), J., being disqualified, did not participate herein.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.