Case law

People v. Reynolds

149 Cal. App. 2d 290 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1957

(People v. Lopez, 126 Cal.App.2d 274, 278 [ 271 P.2d 874 ].) False or evasive answers to material questions with reference to the ownership of stolen property tend to prove such knowledge. (People v. … Boyden, 116 Cal.App.2d 278, 288 [ 253 P.2d 773 ] ; People v. Malouf, *295 135 Cal.App.2d 697, 707-708 [ 287 P.2d 834 ].)

Kuhn v. Department of General Services

22 Cal. App. 4th 1627 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1994

(Bowman v. Board of Pension Commissioners (1984) 155 Cal.App.3d 937, 944 [ 202 Cal.Rptr. 505 ].) … (Gaffney v.

Finnegan v. Schrader

110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 552 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 2001

In Eldridge v. … (See Stigall v.

Keith v. S. S. Goldstone

81 Cal. App. 3d 699 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1978

their contractual duties on board the ship.’ … Farrell Lines, Inc. (3d Cir. 1977) 550 F.2d 142, 144 ; Gay v. Ocean Transport & Trading, Ltd., supra, 546 F.2d at p. 1239 ; Brown v.

A.B.C. Federation of Teachers v. A.B.C. Unified School District

75 Cal. App. 3d 332 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1977

(See, e.g., Holbrook v. Board of Education (1951) 37 Cal.2d 316, 331-332 [ 231 P.2d 853 ]; Rible v. Hughes, supra, 24 Cal.2d 437, 443 .)” … (Fremont v. Crippen, 10 Cal. 211 , [ 70 Am. Dec. 711 ]; Babcock v. Goodrich, 47 Cal. 488 ; Raisch v. Board of Education, 81 Cal. 542 , [ 22 Pac. 890 ]; Robertson v. Trustees, 136 Cal. 403 , [ 69 Pac. 88 ].)”

Robles v. Employment Development Dept.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 2019

(Board). … (See Gunn v.

Carroll v. Commission on Teacher Credentialing

California Court of Appeal · Oct 23, 2020

Brown, Judge. Reversed. Siegel, Yee & Brunner, Dan Siegel and Micah Clatterbaugh, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Chris A. … In Hardy v.

Golden State Water Co. v. Casitas Municipal Water Dist.

California Court of Appeal · May 13, 2015

Brown (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1449, 1465 & fn. 2). … (Professional Engineers in California Government v. Brown (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 861, 872-873; see Galbiso v.

Wilson v. Hidden Valley Municipal Water District

256 Cal. App. 2d 271 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1967

(People v. Oakland Board of Education, 54 Cal. 375, 376 ; cf. Wulzen v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 101 Cal. 15, 24 ; Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co., 211 U.S. 210, 226 [ 53 L.Ed. 150 , 158-159, 29 S.Ct. 67 ].) … Code, § 71531.) 13 oznpare People v. Oakland Board of Education, supra, 54 Cal. 375, 377; Quinchará v.

Trantafello v. Medical Center of Tarzana

182 Cal. App. 3d 315 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1986

In Brown v. … Proc., § 340, subd. (3); Brown v. Bleiberg, supra, 32 Cal.3d at pp. 431, fn. 1, 437.) The battery statute of limitations was tolled in Brown v.

George v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

149 Cal. App. 2d 702 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1957

(Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 69 Cal.App.2d 639 [ 160 P.2d 37 ] ; American Distilling Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 55 Cal.App.2d 799 [ 131 P.2d 609 ].) … In Board of Trustees of Stanford University v.

People v. Vacarella

61 Cal. App. 119 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1923

(Sullivan v. Kuykendall, 82 Ky. 483 [ 56 Am. Rep. 901 ]; Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co., 97 Mo. 473 [ 10 Am. St. Rep. 331 , 3 L. R. A. 539, 11 S. W. 49 ].) … (People v. Collins, 64 Cal. 293 [ 30 Pac. 847 ]; People v. Oldham, 111 Cal. 648 [ 44 Pac. 312 ]; People v. Schmidt, 33 Cal. App. 445 [ 165 Pac. 555 ].)

Haney v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.

17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 336 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 2004

(Brown v. Hammond (E.D.Pa. 1993) 810 F.Supp. 644 .) … (Brown v. Hammond, supra, at p. 646; see Jones v.

Santa Ynez Band of Chumash etc. v. Lexington Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2023

(Marina Pacific, supra, 81 Cal.App.5th at p. 101; Brown Jug, Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. (6th Cir. 2022) 27 F.4th 398, 403; Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co. … (Brown Jug, Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins.

Gottesfeld v. Richmaid Ice Cream Co.

115 Cal. App. 2d 854 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1953

(McClung v. Watt, 190 Cal. 155, 160-161 [211 P: 17] ; Mills v. Brown, 205 Cal. 38, 41 [ 269 P. 636 ]; Freeman v. Dowling, 219 Cal. 213, 216 [ 25 P.2d 980 ] ; Independent Iron Works, Inc., v. … (California Collection Agency v. Fontana, supra, 61 Cal.App.2d p. 653; White v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp., supra, 100 Cal.App.2d 758 ; Freedman v.

Natarajan v. Dignity Health

California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 2019

Joseph’s community board (the governing board of the hospital), which assigned the appeal pursuant to the bylaws to a three-person subcommittee. … Board of Directors (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 648, 657 (Applebaum).)

Kopitske v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.

88 Cal. Rptr. 2d 216 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1999

Ebenstein, whose report on reconsideration was adopted and incorporated unanimously by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (Board). … NOTES [*] Kennard, J., and Brown, J., dissented. [1] All undesignated statutory references are to the Labor Code.

Cloverdale Union High School District of Sonoma County v. Peters

88 Cal. App. 731 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1928

(Webster v. Board, of Education, 140 Cal. 331 [ 73 Pac. 1070 ].) … (Board of Education v. Davidson, 190 Cal. 162, 168 [ 210 Pac. 961 ].) Appellant relies on the case of McCormick Lumber Co. v. Highland School District, 26 Cal.

Fries v. Rite Aid Corp.

173 Cal. App. 4th 182 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 2009

[See Boonyarit v. … [Sanabria v. Embrey (2001) 92 CA4th 422, 425, 111 CR2d 837, 839 (citing text).]” (Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2008) H 11:38 to 11:38.2, pp. 11-22 to 11-23.)

Lanterman v. Anderson

36 Cal. App. 472 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1918

Cas. 13, 77 Pac. 879 ]; Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration, 66 Kan. 710 , [1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 811, 72 Pac. 247 ].) … The case cited by appellant, where the supreme court of Oregon held a complaint before the medical board to be insufficient because not alleging sufficient facts (Board of Medical Examiners v.