Case law

Basurto v. Imperial Irrigation District

211 Cal. App. 4th 866 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 2012

Tumey v. … denied the petition, sought reconsideration by the board]; Haas v.

Brinsmead v. Elk Grove Unified Sch. Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 2023

(Blank v. … (Brown v.

Degener v. Governing Bd. of Wiseburn Sch. Dist.

67 Cal. App. 3d 689 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 1977

In this regard Teachers rely on Burgess v. Board of Education (1974) 41 Cal.App.3d 571 [ 116 Cal.Rptr. 183 ]. We disagree. … In Lewin v.

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNAT. UNION, LOCAL 1000 v. Schwarzenegger

186 Cal. App. 4th 747 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 2010

Federation of Teachers v. A.B.C. Unified Sch. Dist. (1977) 75 Cal.App.3d 332, 340-342 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 111 ]; Reed v. Board of Education (1934) 139 Cal.App. 661, 663 [ 34 P.2d 758 ].) … (See Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 175-178 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ]; California Assn. of Professional Scientists v.

Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. v. County of San Luis Obispo

167 Cal. App. 4th 705 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 15, 2008

Kelly, supra, 397 U.S. at pp. 269-270; Palmer v. Rent Control Board of Brookline, supra, 386 N.E.2d at p. 1050 ; Rivera v. Division of Industrial Welfare, supra, 265 Cal.App.2d at p. 586 .) … In so doing, the Board applies general principles of law and equity. (Ibid.) When acting within its authority to regulate rents, the Board may decide the relevant legal issues (ibid.; McHugh v.

People v. Tinker

212 Cal. App. 4th 1502 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 2013

As support for this proposition, the Attorney General relies on a footnote in the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314 [ 142 Cal.Rptr.3d 824 , 278 P.3d 1182 ] (Brown). … The defendant in Brown had been sentenced to state prison in 2007. (Brown, supra, 54 Cal.4th at p. 318 .)

In Re Heckman

90 Cal. App. 700 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 1928

A number of cases relating to different boards are there cited. See, also, Chinn v. … In the case of State (Mueller) v. Egg Harbor City, 55 N. J.

Gray v. Superior Court

23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 50 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 5, 2005

(Fort v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 12, 23 [ 185 Cal.Rptr. 836 ].) In Smith v. … (Ettinger v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 135 Cal.App.3d 853, 856 [ 185 Cal.Rptr. 601 ], italics in original.)

People v. Corelleone CA2/2

California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 2014

(See People v. Brown (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 1213, 1225-1226 (Brown).) In People v. … (Brown, supra, 147 Cal.App.4th at p. 1226.)

Lanterman v. Anderson

36 Cal. App. 472 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1918

Cas. 13, 77 Pac. 879 ]; Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration, 66 Kan. 710 , [1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 811, 72 Pac. 247 ].) … The case cited by appellant, where the supreme court of Oregon held a complaint before the medical board to be insufficient because not alleging sufficient facts (Board of Medical Examiners v.

Golden Gateway Center v. San Francisco Residential Stabilization

87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 332 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 1999

(Mansell v. Board of Administration (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 539, 544 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 574 ].) *1208 III. Discussion A. … The Board urges us to follow Interstate Gen. v. Dist. of Col.

Jacks v. Taylor

24 Cal. App. 667 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1914

Being so, it follows as a necessary consequence that the claim based thereon was also illegal (Perry v. Ames, 26 Cal. 372 ), and that therefore the board of supervisors had no jurisdiction to allow it (Keller v. … The mere fact that the claim was allowed by the board did not invest it with a validity which it did not theretofore possess (Phelan v. San Francisco, 6 Cal. 531 ; Gardner v.

People v. Pervoe

161 Cal. App. 3d 342 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1984

One of the men was wearing a brown fur coat. After arriving in Oakland, Brown drove onto Highway 80 where he continued until he reached an apartment complex in Richmond. … Brown, however, was unable to identify appellant in court. Brown was also shown a picture of appellant’s sister. He identified her as one of the three women.

MacKey v. Department of Corrections

130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 57 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 2003

In King v. … In Priest v.

Becker v. Council of the City of Albany

47 Cal. App. 2d 702 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1941

(Ward v. San Diego School Dist., 203 Cal. 712 [ 265 Pac. 821 ]; Mitchell v. Hartman, 112 Cal. App. 370 [ 297 Pac. 77 ]; Kelso v. Board of Education, 42 Cal. App. (2d) 415 [ 109 Pac. (2d) 29 ].) … App. 685 [ 145 Pac. 167 ] ; Mitchell v. Hartman, supra; Mertz v. City of Los Angeles, 16 Cal. App. (2d) 697 [ 61 Pac. (2d) 346 ] ; Ackerman v. Moody, 38 Cal. App. 461 [ 176 Pac. 696 ] ; Gerth v.

Smith v. Smith

94 Cal. App. 35 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1928

Appellants set forth that all questions possible to be raised in this case are fully considered and decided in his favor in the case of Brown v. Brown, 83 Cal. App. 74 [ 256 Pac. 595 ]. … The holding of this court in the case of Brown v.

Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins

69 Cal. App. 2d 639 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1945

(Watts v. Holland, 56 Tex. 54 .) … Moreover, rule 55 definitely attempted to enlarge and extend the statute, which is beyond the power of the board. Tux Ginger Ale Co., Ltd. v.

People v. Reynolds

149 Cal. App. 2d 290 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1957

(People v. Lopez, 126 Cal.App.2d 274, 278 [ 271 P.2d 874 ].) False or evasive answers to material questions with reference to the ownership of stolen property tend to prove such knowledge. (People v. … Boyden, 116 Cal.App.2d 278, 288 [ 253 P.2d 773 ] ; People v. Malouf, *295 135 Cal.App.2d 697, 707-708 [ 287 P.2d 834 ].)

North Coast Village Condominium Assn. v. Phillips

California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 2023

Klopstock v. … City of Los Angeles v.

Novick v. City of Los Angeles

148 Cal. App. 3d 325 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1983

(See Brown v. … In Martinez v. California, supra, 444 U.S. 277 , the California Parole Board released an alleged sex offender who committed murder some five months after his release.