Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.12s

  • Kitzig v. Nordquist

    97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 762 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 2000

    Norgart v. … (Ibid., citing Brown v. Bleiberg (1982) 32 Cal.3d 426, 438, fn. 9 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 228 , 651 P.2d 815 ] (Brown).)

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • People v. McLaine

    204 Cal. App. 2d 96 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1962

    One of the two men was wearing a brown hat but Gordon could not remember whether it was Dillard or McLaine. … Q. . . . would you describe the person in the back seat with the brown hat; did he make any movements as you followed the ear ? A.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • George v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

    149 Cal. App. 2d 702 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1957

    (Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 69 Cal.App.2d 639 [ 160 P.2d 37 ] ; American Distilling Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 55 Cal.App.2d 799 [ 131 P.2d 609 ].) … In Board of Trustees of Stanford University v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Berman v. Regents of the University of California

    229 Cal. App. 4th 1265 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 2014

    (Campbell v. … (Yamaha Corp. of America v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • City of Los Angeles v. Standard Oil Co.

    262 Cal. App. 2d 118 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1968

    (See Augustus v. Bean, 56 Cal.2d 270, 272 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 641 , 363 P.2d 873 ].) This case is distinguished from Board of Education v. Alliance Assur. Co., 159 F. 994 and Coolidge v. Standard Acc. Ins. … (United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437 [ 14 L.Ed.2d 484 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 ]; Taylor & Co. v. Place (1856) 4 R.I. 324 ; Truax-Traer Coal Co. v. Compensation Comr., 123 W.Va. 621 [ 17 S.E.2d 330 ].)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Guarantee Forklift, Inc. v. Capacity of Texas, Inc.

    11 Cal. App. 5th 1066 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 2017

    (Capacity of Texas v. New Motor Vehicle Board (Sacramento Super. Court No. 34-2014-80001848).) … (Capacity of Texas v. New Motor Vehicle Board, Court of Appeal, No. C080679.) E.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Chosick v. Reilly

    125 Cal. App. 2d 334 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1954

    English v. … (Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125, 131 [ 173 P.2d 545 ].)

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. City of Los Angeles

    4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 325 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 2003

    The Board rejected this argument. On October 26, 2000, the Board found Jackson guilty of counts 1, 2, and 3, and recommended termination. The chief of police terminated Jackson on November 14, 2000. … (Baggett v. Gates, supra, 32 Cal.3d at p. 136 .)

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Sesma v. Cueto

    129 Cal. App. 3d 108 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1982

    (City of Chula Vista v. Pagard (1981) 115 Cal.App.3d 785, 801 [ 171 Cal.Rptr. 738 ].) *113 In D’Amico v. … (Maxwell v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Basurto v. Imperial Irrigation District

    211 Cal. App. 4th 866 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 2012

    Tumey v. … denied the petition, sought reconsideration by the board]; Haas v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Brinsmead v. Elk Grove Unified Sch. Dist.

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 2023

    (Blank v. … (Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNAT. UNION, LOCAL 1000 v. Schwarzenegger

    186 Cal. App. 4th 747 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 2010

    Federation of Teachers v. A.B.C. Unified Sch. Dist. (1977) 75 Cal.App.3d 332, 340-342 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 111 ]; Reed v. Board of Education (1934) 139 Cal.App. 661, 663 [ 34 P.2d 758 ].) … (See Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 175-178 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ]; California Assn. of Professional Scientists v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Tinker

    212 Cal. App. 4th 1502 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 2013

    As support for this proposition, the Attorney General relies on a footnote in the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314 [ 142 Cal.Rptr.3d 824 , 278 P.3d 1182 ] (Brown). … The defendant in Brown had been sentenced to state prison in 2007. (Brown, supra, 54 Cal.4th at p. 318 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Heckman

    90 Cal. App. 700 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 1928

    A number of cases relating to different boards are there cited. See, also, Chinn v. … In the case of State (Mueller) v. Egg Harbor City, 55 N. J.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Gray v. Superior Court

    23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 50 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 5, 2005

    (Fort v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 12, 23 [ 185 Cal.Rptr. 836 ].) In Smith v. … (Ettinger v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 135 Cal.App.3d 853, 856 [ 185 Cal.Rptr. 601 ], italics in original.)

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • People v. Corelleone CA2/2

    California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 2014

    (See People v. Brown (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 1213, 1225-1226 (Brown).) In People v. … (Brown, supra, 147 Cal.App.4th at p. 1226.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lanterman v. Anderson

    36 Cal. App. 472 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1918

    Cas. 13, 77 Pac. 879 ]; Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration, 66 Kan. 710 , [1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 811, 72 Pac. 247 ].) … The case cited by appellant, where the supreme court of Oregon held a complaint before the medical board to be insufficient because not alleging sufficient facts (Board of Medical Examiners v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Staniforth v. The Judges' Retirement System

    California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 2016

    (See generally Miller v. Brown (1951) 107 Cal.App.2d 304 [common count for money owed subjected to two-year statute of limitations where premised on oral contract].) … (Holmes v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joaquin v. City of Los Angeles

    202 Cal. App. 4th 1207 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2012

    (Beck Development Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 1160, 1203-1204 [ 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 518 ].)” (McRae v. … The Board’s decision is based solely upon the evidence presented to it.” (Holcomb v. City of Los Angeles (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1560, 1565 [ 259 Cal.Rptr. 1 ].)

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Hilton v. Superior Court

    239 Cal. App. 4th 766 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 2014

    The court concluded, “So my finding is you can reopen the issue of restitution based upon [People v. Brown (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 1213] and it is an unauthorized order in restitution.” … People v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.