Case law

People v. Lozano

California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 2017

In accord with the holding in People v. Franklin, (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261 (Franklin), and the reasoning in Montgomery v. … (Graham v. Florida (2010) 560 U.S. 48, 75.)

Bradbury v. Kaiser

3 Cal. App. 4th 1257 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 1992

On October 3, 1989, the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) served on the district attorney a notice of levy and an order to withhold property belonging to Hodson. … Section 18817 provides in part: “The Franchise Tax Board may by notice, served personally or by first-class mail, require any employer, person, officer or department of the state, political subdivision or agency of the state

Rotman v. MacLin Markets, Inc.

24 Cal. App. 4th 1709 · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 1994

Brown told him not to worry, saying "We'll take care of you. Don't worry. We're all under control." He also testified that Mr. Brown gave him similar assurances when Mr. Brown became head of security. Mrs. … The dissent relies on Williams v. Saga Enterprises, Inc. (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 142 [ 274 Cal.Rptr. 901 ], a summary judgment case.

People v. Friedman

4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 273 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 27, 2003

(People v. Brown, supra, 204 Cal.App.3d at pp. 1448-1451.) … (People v. Brown, supra, 204 Cal.App.3d at p. 1450 .) As a result, the Brown court upheld the defendants’ California burglary convictions. (Id. at p. 1451.) In People v.

Ball v. City Council of Coachella

252 Cal. App. 2d 136 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1967

When Judge Brown called the ease on July 6, appellant made a motion to disqualify him under section 170.6. On July 9 Judge Brown denied the motion and thereafter tried the case on the merits. … In the instant case, the motion was untimely under the law as it existed when Judge Brown ruled upon it.

People v. Superior Court (Olson)

96 Cal. App. 3d 181 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1979

If the board has no such special fund the moneys shall be paid to the State Treasurer. “As used in this subdivision, ‘board’ includes commission, bureau, division, and other similarly constituted agency. … (Brown v. Superior Court, 5 Cal.3d 509, 514-515 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 584 , 487 P.2d 1224 ]; Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 Cal.3d 536, 542-543 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 709 , 488 P.2d 13 ]; City of Huntington Beach v.

Kenney v. Superior Court

255 Cal. App. 2d 106 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1967

(b) and (g) ; Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 218 Cal.App.2d 430 .) … Moreover, as we observed in Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 218 Cal.App.2d 430 , at page 443, the medical committee serves a very useful purpose.

People v. Landry

212 Cal. App. 3d 1428 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1989

Murphy saw his friend, Reginald Brown, climb the last few stairs and approach from his left. Johnson turned, trained his gun on Brown, and asked him what he intended to do. Brown began to retreat. … (People v.

Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of California

217 Cal. App. 2d 77 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1963

Proc., § 1875, suhd. 3; Dittus v. Cranston (1959) 53 Cal.2d 284, 286 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 327 , 347 P.2d 671 ] (records of State Board of Control); Pearson v. … Brite v. Board of Supervisors (1937) 21 Cal.App.2d 233, 235 [ 68 P.2d 1007 ]; Hammel v. Neylan, supra, 31 Cal.App. 21, 28 .)

O'Neal v. Stanislaus County Employees' Retirement Assn.

8 Cal. App. 5th 1184 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 2017

(Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs’ Assn. v. Board of Retirement (1997) 16 Cal.4th 483, 490.) … V.

Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins

69 Cal. App. 2d 639 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1945

(Watts v. Holland, 56 Tex. 54 .) … Moreover, rule 55 definitely attempted to enlarge and extend the statute, which is beyond the power of the board. Tux Ginger Ale Co., Ltd. v.

Taylor v. Madigan

53 Cal. App. 3d 943 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1975

(Bacich v. Board of Control (1943) 23 Cal.2d 343 [ 144 P.2d 818 ]; Rose v. State (1942) 19 Cal.2d 713 [ 123 P.2d 505 ]; Vinnicombe v. … Proc., § 412.20.) 17 See Brown v. Liberty Loan Corporation of Duval (M.D.Fla. 1974) 392 F.Supp. 1023, 1036-1037 . 18 See Brown v. Liberty Loan Corporation, supra. 19 See also Foster v.

People v. Brandon

166 Cal. App. 4th 238 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 2008

People v. … [Citation.]" ( People v. Brown (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 461, 471 [ 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 652 ] [Fourth Dist., Div. Two].)

Simmons v. Santa Barbara Ice and Cold Storage Co.

162 Cal. App. 2d 23 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1958

Superior Court, 24 Cal.2d 627, 632 [ 150 P.2d 881 ]; McWilliams v. Hudson, 98 Cal.App. 185, 189 [ 276 P. 598 , 277 P. 529 ]; Kaufman v. Brown, 106 Cal.App.2d 686, 689 [ 235 P.2d 632 ]. Hilliker v. … Board of Trustees, 91 Cal.App. 521, 526 [ 267 P. 367 ], relied upon by appellant, is distinguishable.

People v. Seminario CA4/3

California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 2014

(Ibid.; see Brown v. … In Brown v.

Palm Springs Villas II Homeowners Ass'n v. Parth

248 Cal. App. 4th 268 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 2016

(Affan v. … Harvey v.

Williams v. Board of Civil Service etc. CA2/3

California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 2020

Filed 9/29/20 Williams v. Board of Civil Service etc. … (Skelly v. State Personnel Board, [supra,] 15 Cal.3d [at pp.] 217-218.)

Young v. Shriver

56 Cal. App. 653 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1922

improvements in connection therewith, has a lien upon said lot or tract of land for his work done and materials furnished; provided, that in cases where the improvements made or work done is subject to acceptance by any municipal board … The conclusion at which we have arrived in this case is sustained by the case of Brown v. Wyman, 56 Iowa, 452 [ 41 Am. Rep. 117 , 9 N. W. 344 ], above adverted to.

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. City & County of San Francisco

129 Cal. App. 3d 876 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1982

Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1965) 63 *882 Cal.2d 222, 231 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 869 , 404 P.2d 477 ]; Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. … State Bd. of Equalization (1970) 4 Cal.App.3d 21, 33 [ 84 Cal.Rptr. 88 ]; Edward Brown & Sons v. McColgan (1942) 53 Cal.App.2d 504, 507 [ 128 P.2d 186 ].)

Shipyard Workers Educational Ass'n v. Lynch

250 Cal. App. 2d 238 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1967

The by-laws of Local 9 contain provisions for a board of three trustees to be elected by the general membership of the Local and to serve staggered terms of three years each. … Brown v. Hook, 79 Cal.App.2d 781 [ 180 P.2d 982 ] ; Crocker v. Weil, 227 Ore. 260 [ 361 P.2d 1014 ]; and Bradley v. O’Hare, 11 App. Div.2d 15 [ 202 N.Y.S.2d 141 ].)