Case law

Griffith v. County of Los Angeles

267 Cal. App. 2d 837 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1968

Co. v. … (Leach Corp. v.

People v. Esquivel

28 Cal. App. 4th 1386 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1994

When he came downstairs, Wilson and Brown were coming in through the back door. He did not come to Jenny’s aid because he was afraid of Wilson and Brown. … (People v. Marks (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1335, 1345 [ 248 Cal.Rptr. 874 , 756 P.2d 260 ]; People v. Weiss (1958) 50 Cal.2d 535, 566 [ 327 P.2d 527 ]; People v. Brown (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1361, 1372 [ 277 Cal.Rptr. 309 ].)

Kopitske v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.

88 Cal. Rptr. 2d 216 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 1999

Ebenstein, whose report on reconsideration was adopted and incorporated unanimously by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (Board). … NOTES [*] Kennard, J., and Brown, J., dissented. [1] All undesignated statutory references are to the Labor Code.

Wild Goose Country Club v. County of Butte

60 Cal. App. 339 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1922

Land Co. v. … In Sunday Lake Iron Co. v.

People v. Friedman

4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 273 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 27, 2003

(People v. Brown, supra, 204 Cal.App.3d at pp. 1448-1451.) … (People v. Brown, supra, 204 Cal.App.3d at p. 1450 .) As a result, the Brown court upheld the defendants’ California burglary convictions. (Id. at p. 1451.) In People v.

People v. Murray

218 Cal. App. 2d 317 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1963

(People v. Martin, 45 Cal.2d 755, 762 [ 290 P.2d 855 ]; People v. Hen Chin, 145 Cal.App.2d 583, 586 [ 303 P.2d 18 ]; People v. Rayson, 197 Cal.App.2d 33, 39 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 243 ].) … (People v. Norton, 209 Cal.App.2d 173 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 676 ]; People v. Young, 214 Cal.App.2d 131 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 492 ].) Defendant’s reliance on Bielicki v.

Vann v. City and County of S.F.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 2023

(Bauer, supra, 45 Cal.2d at pp. 288–289; accord, Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners (1922) 188 Cal. 525, 532, disapproved on other grounds in Mass v. … In McKee, the court held an intergovernmental crime-fighting task force was a “local agency” and its board of directors and executive council were “legislative bodies” as defined by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov.

Randy's Trucking v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2023

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP, Arezoo Jamshidi, Kaitlyn A. Jensen, Krsto Mijanovic, Elizabeth Rhodes, and Steven Scordalakis for Petitioner. Artiano Shinoff and Paul V. … (Mercury Casualty Co. v. Hertz Corp. (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 414, 425; California Assn. for Safety Education v. Brown (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 1264, 1274‒ 1275.) 33.

People v. Ayala

167 Cal. App. 2d 49 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 1959

Brown, 49 Cal.2d 577, 591 [ 320 P.2d 5 ]; People v. … (See People v. Dorman, 28 Cal. 2d 846 [ 172 P.2d 686 ] ; People v. Brown, 29 Cal.2d 555 [ 176 P.2d 929 ].) In People v. Kehoe, 33 Cal.2d 711 [ 204 P.2d 321 ], People v.

Durham v. City of Los Angeles

91 Cal. App. 3d 567 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1979

(D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners, 11 Cal.3d 1, 17 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].) … (Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855, 862 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.

Kettner v. Shippey

8 Cal. App. 342 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1908

The complaint declares upon a promissory note, negotiable in form, executed by defendants to one Brown for $1,300 and interest. … (Giselman v. Starr, 106 Cal. 658 , [ 40 Pac. 8 ].)

Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. County of Alameda

41 Cal. App. 3d 163 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1974

Bixby v. … State Board of Equalization, 240 Cal.App.2d 205, 216 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 448 ]; Board of Supervisors v. Archer, supra, 18 Cal.App.3d 717, 724 ; Sacramento Mun. Util. Dist. v.

Bechtel v. Bechtel

124 Cal. App. 617 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1932

Rep. 266 , 23 Pac. 395 ]; Soule v. Soule, 4 Cal. App. 97 [ 87 Pac. 205 ]; Duffey v. Duffey, 79 Cal. App. 734 [ 251 Pac. 218 ]). Furthermore, it may make the order for a limited period (Brown v. … Brown, 206 Cal. 7 [ 272 Pac. 1052 ]). But this is not conclusive upon its power to require payments to be made after the expiration of the period or to increase the amount (Smith v. Superior Court, 89 Cal.

Williams v. Board of Civil Service etc. CA2/3

California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 2020

Filed 9/29/20 Williams v. Board of Civil Service etc. … (Skelly v. State Personnel Board, [supra,] 15 Cal.3d [at pp.] 217-218.)

Joaquin v. City of Los Angeles

202 Cal. App. 4th 1207 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2012

(Beck Development Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 1160, 1203-1204 [ 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 518 ].)” (McRae v. … The Board’s decision is based solely upon the evidence presented to it.” (Holcomb v. City of Los Angeles (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1560, 1565 [ 259 Cal.Rptr. 1 ].)

People v. Lares

261 Cal. App. 2d 657 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1968

(People v. Brown, 49 Cal.2d 577, 587 [ 320 P.2d 5 ].) The doctor said that Acosta was suffering from “acute back strain.” He discharged him in the morning of the next day, much improved. … (People v. Wilson, 235 Cal.App.2d 266, 273 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 267 ]; People v. Parker, 235 Cal.App.2d 100, 103 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 909 ]; People v. Luke, 233 Cal.App.2d 793, 798 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 878 ].)

Golden State Water Co. v. Casitas Municipal Water Dist.

California Court of Appeal · May 13, 2015

Brown (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1449, 1465 & fn. 2). … (Professional Engineers in California Government v. Brown (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 861, 872-873; see Galbiso v.

D'Arrigo Bros. v. United Farmworkers of America

224 Cal. App. 4th 790 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 2014

E.E.O.C. v. … : Cook Brown and Geoffrey F.

Peerless Stages, Inc. v. Santa Cruz Metro. Transit Dist.

67 Cal. App. 3d 343 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1977

City Council (1973) 9 Cal.3d 950 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 513 P.2d 601 ]; Sail’er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby (1971) 5 Cal.3d 1 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 329 , 485 P.2d 529 , 46 A.L.R.3d 351 ]; Board of Education v. … (Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855, 863 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d *349 212, 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ]; see 2 Sands, Sutherland Statutory Construction (4th ed.) § 40.01 et seq., pp. 134-244.)

Shoults v. Alderson

55 Cal. App. 527 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1921

The only question before this court upon this appeal is: Did the board of medical examiners exceed its jurisdiction in making the order complained of? (Sec. 1068, Code Civ. Proc.; Jordan v. Alderson, 48 Cal. … the board.