Case law

H. & W. Pierce, Inc. v. County of Santa Barbara

40 Cal. App. 302 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1919

(Teague v. Board of Trustees, 156 Cal. 351 , [ 104 Pac. 581 ] ; People v. Town of Ontario, 148 Cal. 625 , [ 84 Pac. 205 ] ; People v. Loyalton, 147 Cal. 774 , [ 82 Pac. 620 ] ; Central Pacific R. R. Co. v. … (Hagenmeyer v. Board of Equalization of Mendocino County, 82 Cal. 214 , [ 23 Pac. 14 ].)

People v. Flores

California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 2024

(People v. Brown (1994) 8 Cal.4th 746 (Brown).) … (People v.

LNSU 1, LLC v. Alta Del Mar Coastal Collection Community Assn.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 2023

(Ni v. … (a)), it does not prohibit the board from discussing the items outside a meeting. Had the Legislature intended to prohibit such discussions, it knew how to do so. In the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov.

Comstock v. Davis

44 Cal. App. 275 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1919

(Taylor v. Mott, 123 Cal. 497 , [ 56 Pac. 256 ].) Certainly a husband and father is benefited by an obligation on the part of the government to care for his family after his death. … (Stuart v. Laird, 1 Cranch, 299 , [ 2 L. Ed. 115 , see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes]; Railroad Com. v. Market St. Ry. Co., 132 Cal. 677, 680 , [ 64 Pac. 1065 ].)

People v. Coleman

8 Cal. App. 3d 722 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1970

Browning also produced a gun. Coleman pointed his pistol at Harich’s head and Browning held his at the victim’s chest. … People v.

Lilli Ann Corp. v. City & County of San Francisco

70 Cal. App. 3d 162 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1977

(Rittersbacher v. Board of Supervisors (1934) 220 Cal. 535 , 542 . . .) … Ry. v. Browning (1940) 310 U.S. 362, 366-369 [ 84 L.Ed. 1254, 1256-1258 , 60 S.Ct. 968 ].) 5 On October 27, 1969, contemporaneously with the filing of its opinion in Knoff v.

People v. Theus

136 Cal. App. 2d 722 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 1955

Some time before noon, Lord came to the Williams-Brown home. … (People v. New-land, 15 Cal.2d 678, 681 [ 104 P.2d 778 ].)

People v. Burns

109 Cal. App. 2d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 3, 1952

People v. … (People v.

In Re Ramirez

114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 381 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 2001

V, § 8, subd. (a); see Jenkins v. Knight (1956) 46 Cal.2d 220, 223 [ 293 P.2d 6 ].) … In Edwards v.

Bechtel v. Bechtel

124 Cal. App. 617 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1932

Rep. 266 , 23 Pac. 395 ]; Soule v. Soule, 4 Cal. App. 97 [ 87 Pac. 205 ]; Duffey v. Duffey, 79 Cal. App. 734 [ 251 Pac. 218 ]). Furthermore, it may make the order for a limited period (Brown v. … Brown, 206 Cal. 7 [ 272 Pac. 1052 ]). But this is not conclusive upon its power to require payments to be made after the expiration of the period or to increase the amount (Smith v. Superior Court, 89 Cal.

People v. Romero

68 Cal. App. 3d 543 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1977

Frederick Browning, working in an undercover narcotics capacity, went to the residence of one Apolonio Cortez Romo. Browning had earlier successfully solicited the unwitting Romo to help him (Browning) purchase heroin. … Upon arrival at the latter location, Browning gave appellant $25 in recorded county funds and appellant exited the vehicle and disappeared from Browning’s view.

People v. Esquivel

28 Cal. App. 4th 1386 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1994

When he came downstairs, Wilson and Brown were coming in through the back door. He did not come to Jenny’s aid because he was afraid of Wilson and Brown. … (People v. Marks (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1335, 1345 [ 248 Cal.Rptr. 874 , 756 P.2d 260 ]; People v. Weiss (1958) 50 Cal.2d 535, 566 [ 327 P.2d 527 ]; People v. Brown (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1361, 1372 [ 277 Cal.Rptr. 309 ].)

Langerman v. Puritan Dining Room Co.

21 Cal. App. 637 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 4, 1913

(See London, Paris & American Bank v. Smith, 101 Cal. 415 , [ 35 Pac. 1027 ] ; Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Knock, 117 Mich. 225 , [75 N. W. 458]; Michigan Ins. Co. v. Brown, 11 Mich. 265 ; McDaniels v. … There are other cases cited by appellants upon the question of consideration, but, like the ease of Chaffee v. Brown, they are as to the facts readily to be differentiated from the present case. 6.

People v. Friedman

4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 273 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 27, 2003

(People v. Brown, supra, 204 Cal.App.3d at pp. 1448-1451.) … (People v. Brown, supra, 204 Cal.App.3d at p. 1450 .) As a result, the Brown court upheld the defendants’ California burglary convictions. (Id. at p. 1451.) In People v.

Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. County of Alameda

41 Cal. App. 3d 163 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1974

Bixby v. … State Board of Equalization, 240 Cal.App.2d 205, 216 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 448 ]; Board of Supervisors v. Archer, supra, 18 Cal.App.3d 717, 724 ; Sacramento Mun. Util. Dist. v.

People v. Lares

261 Cal. App. 2d 657 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1968

(People v. Brown, 49 Cal.2d 577, 587 [ 320 P.2d 5 ].) The doctor said that Acosta was suffering from “acute back strain.” He discharged him in the morning of the next day, much improved. … (People v. Wilson, 235 Cal.App.2d 266, 273 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 267 ]; People v. Parker, 235 Cal.App.2d 100, 103 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 909 ]; People v. Luke, 233 Cal.App.2d 793, 798 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 878 ].)

Shoults v. Alderson

55 Cal. App. 527 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1921

The only question before this court upon this appeal is: Did the board of medical examiners exceed its jurisdiction in making the order complained of? (Sec. 1068, Code Civ. Proc.; Jordan v. Alderson, 48 Cal. … the board.

In re Trejo

10 Cal. App. 5th 972 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 2017

Griggs v. … Oates (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1048, 1057, quoting Sierra Club v.

Harbison v. Mallon

76 Cal. App. 468 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1926

Thereafter, on April 1, 1919, the board of directors called a special election for the purpose of voting an assessment of $52,355 to pay the costs of such improvements and betterments. … Brown, engineer of the district, shows all the improvements and betterments installed in the system by the Maxwell Irrigation District and also the installation of storage pumps and motors for the purpose of giving assurance

Peerless Stages, Inc. v. Santa Cruz Metro. Transit Dist.

67 Cal. App. 3d 343 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1977

City Council (1973) 9 Cal.3d 950 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 513 P.2d 601 ]; Sail’er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby (1971) 5 Cal.3d 1 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 329 , 485 P.2d 529 , 46 A.L.R.3d 351 ]; Board of Education v. … (Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855, 863 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d *349 212, 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ]; see 2 Sands, Sutherland Statutory Construction (4th ed.) § 40.01 et seq., pp. 134-244.)