Case law

Turner v. Victoria

California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 2021

(State Dept. of State Hospitals v. … Boy Scouts of America v.

Calexico Lumber Co. v. Emerson

54 Cal. App. 239 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 14, 1921

In Bell v. Brown, 22 Cal. 671 , there is a dictum at variance with the principle of the cases just cited, and the language of that case, at least, was applied in Hayes v. Silver Creek etc. … Although the dictum in Bell v. Brown is apparently in accord with the rule in many of the other states (note to Seattle National Bank v. Jones, 48 L. R. A. 177, 188, and note to Susznik v. Alger Logging Co., Ann.

People v. Molina

25 Cal. App. 4th 1038 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1994

(Texas v. Brown (1983) 460 U.S. 730, 739-740 [ 75 L.Ed.2d 502, 511-513 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 ].) … (See People v. Johnson (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 52, 55-56 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 811 ] and People v. Grubb (1965) 63 Cal.2d 614, 620-621 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 772 , 408 P.2d 100 ].) As discussed, under New York v.

Manquero v. Turlock Joint Union High School District

227 Cal. App. 2d 131 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1964

Workers v. … J., and Brown (R. M.), J., concurred. Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied July 1, 1964.

Kite v. Campbell

142 Cal. App. 3d 793 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1983

(Weber v. City Council (1973) 9 Cal.3d 950, 958-959 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 513 P.2d 601 ].) The right to sue for negligently inflicted injuries has been specifically held not to constitute a fundamental right. (Brown v. … “[T]he Legislature may restrict the period of limitations on a pending claim so long as the plaintiff is given ‘a reasonable time in which to sue.’ ” (Brown v.

Wild Goose Country Club v. County of Butte

60 Cal. App. 339 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1922

Land Co. v. … In Sunday Lake Iron Co. v.

Cole v. Ames

155 Cal. App. 2d 8 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1957

Brown ? “Mr. Brown: Was your Honor talking to me? “The Court: Yes. “Mr. Brown: I don’t know. “The Court: Well, you can look at them. “Mr. Brown: I assume that they perhaps do relate to it. … Brown who examines them.) “Mr. Brown: Apparently it relates to this property, I guess. “Mr. Maddox: I again offer them, your Honor. “Mr.

Meritplan Insurance v. Woollum

52 Cal. App. 3d 167 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 14, 1975

Co. v. Jacober, 10 Cal.3d 193 [ 110 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 514 P.2d 953 ]; Schwalbe v. … Exch. v. Brown, 252 Cal.App.2d 120 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 1 ]. In Brown , a wife was killed while riding in an automobile owned by her and her husband and driven by him.

Madonna v. County of San Luis Obispo

39 Cal. App. 3d 57 · California Court of Appeal · May 10, 1974

(Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125, 131 [ 173 P.2d 545 ].) 2. Attorneys’ Fees. … State Personnel Board, 250 Cal.App.2d 445, 447 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 280 ]; Lorimore v. State Personnel Board, 232 Cal.App.2d 183, 186 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 640 ].)

People v. Burns

109 Cal. App. 2d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 3, 1952

People v. … (People v.

Estate of Browne

2 Cal. App. 3d 406 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 8, 1969

Rptr. 705 Estate of HARRY TRUMAN BROWNE, Deceased. GAYLA LEE BROWNE COBB WEIBLE, Petitioner and Respondent, v. F. FILMORE JAFFE, Objector and Appellant. Docket No. 34473. … Browne's probate proceeding.

People v. Flores

176 Cal. App. 4th 1171 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 2009

A comparison of Carmell and the subsequent California Supreme Court case of People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ] (Brown) illustrates the difference. … (Brown, at p. 394, italics omitted.) Brown then can best be seen as an application of a Supreme Court case, Thompson v. Missouri, supra, 171 U.S. 380 , a case our Supreme Court cited in Brown , at page 395.

Ursino v. Superior Court

39 Cal. App. 3d 611 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1974

(See People v. Hecht, 105 Cal. 621, 627 [ 38 P. 941 ]; Jacobs v. Board of Supervisors, 100 Cal. 121, 132 [ 34 P. 630 ]; People v. Coghill, 47 Cal. 361, 363 .) … (People v. Hecht, supra.) Thus, if a board ijs composed of five members three of such members constitute a majority capable and competent to exercise the authority of the whole board. (People v. Hecht, supra.)

Novick v. City of Los Angeles

148 Cal. App. 3d 325 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1983

(See Brown v. … In Martinez v. California, supra, 444 U.S. 277 , the California Parole Board released an alleged sex offender who committed murder some five months after his release.

Hatcher v. Heatley

201 Cal. App. 2d 524 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1962

BROWN, J. This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment granting defendants’ motion to dismiss under the two-year clause in section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure. … (Cameron v. Cameron, 110 Cal.App.2d 258, 261 [ 242 P.2d 408 ].) In Sawyer v.

Hart v. Browne

103 Cal. App. 3d 947 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1980

Thus, in Thomsen v. … In Fish v.

Nathan G. v. Clovis Unified School District

224 Cal. App. 4th 1393 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 2014

Brown v. Crandall (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1, 8 [“A petitioner has no beneficial interest if she will gain no direct benefit from the issuance of a writ and suffer no direct detriment if it is denied.”].) … What process is due a student facing involuntary transfer to continuation school is a matter of significance to students and their families, school boards, and school administrators and likely to recur. (Cf. John A. v.

People ex rel. Superior Court v. Robinson

190 Cal. App. 3d 334 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1987

(See Stanton v. Panish (1980) 28 Cal.3d 107, 115-116 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 584 , 612 P.2d 137 ]; Brown v. Hite, supra, 64 Cal.2d at p. 127 ; see also 63 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 694 (1980).) … v.

Park & Shop Markets, Inc. v. City of Berkeley

116 Cal. App. 3d 78 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1981

(Guardianship of Brown (1976) 16 Cal.3d 326, 333 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 10 , 546 P.2d 298 ].) … (See Daniel v. Board of Police Commissioners, supra, at p. 571; Cristmat, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 590, 594 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 325 ].)

Westbrook v. Superior Court

176 Cal. App. 3d 703 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1986

Westbrook relies initially on language in Brown v. … In Estate of Cooper, supra, 274 Cal.App.2d 70, 79 , immediately before quoting the rules of law enumerated in Brown v.